MI5 was warned about suicide bomber
Did Britain's MI5(freemason controlled) deliberately ignore warnings about Manchester suicide bomber?
How many boxes does an Islamist extremist have to tick before he qualifies for close surveillance by the security services?
Salman Abedi: 'Public called anti-terrorism hotline about suicide bomber' up to 5 years ago(VIDEO)
Manchester suicide attacker 'was KNOWN to security services but not thought to pose immediate threat'
Security services face claims Manchester killer's family and friends warned them YEARS ago he thought 'being a suicide bomber was OK'
TOP French official has revealed Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi is believed to have recently travelled to Syria and had “proven” links with ISIS
5,000 soldiers deployed to Britain’s streets alongside tooled-up gun cops after Theresa May raises threat level to ‘critical’ amid fears of ‘imminent’ terror attack
Manchester suicide bomber named as Salman Abedi
Search continues for Manchester bomber's possible ISIS connections (VIDEO)
May triggers marshall law putting British troops on the streets(VIDEO)
BRITISH BORN BOMBER SAS storm the Manchester home of terror killer Salman Abedi, 22, who lived with his mum and ‘chanted Islamic prayers in the street’
Suicide bomber Salman Abedi had just returned from Libya
General Election campaigning suspended after Manchester Arena explosion
Marshall law (Operation Tempora) activated on British streets
Ex-MI5 spy explains some of its inner workings
Much more on MI5 here
Much more on Big Brother spying here
We hear time and again how we are all being spied on a surveilled by the latest CCTV and internet technology in Britain
supposedly to stop attacks like the Manchester suicide bombing. Housed within MI5 is one arm of the
freemason network that has the Royals Duke of Kent as its head and their influence should be as worrying
as any lone suicide bomber who, going by the latest news, was KNOWN to Britain's security services.
Also there have been reports he had just come back from Syria and despite that MI5 had claimed he did not
pose any threat. Shouldn't the media be directing their attention at the supposed spy agencies who
would have knowledge of the bombers history but decided not to intervene and gave him the opportunity
to kill young children due to a lack of attention by those who claim they spy to protect?
We have published many articles about Britain's arcane security services who through their failures
are a bigger threat to the UK than the terror threats now being wheeled out across Britain. Are they
REALLY there to protect us or allowing attacks to distract attention from the exposures of the
political mafia who seem to wallow in these attacks claiming they will protect us when that is so
far from the truth? If they had knowledge but failed to act then they more than anyone else are responsible
for the attack taking place given the background to the killers recent visits to areas known as terrorist
hot spots. You do NOT have to be a rocket scientist to see clearly Salman Abedi was a potential threat yet was not