THE WORST PARENTS 30 December 2006


The people who would make the worst parents would start with

1.The state
2.Judges
3.Lawyers
4.barristers
5.Q.C's
6.Social workers
7.police

Everyone of the above who play their part in the tyrannical and draconian family law system and who operate a huge financial SCAM on the public purse have NO RIGHT to pontificate on the merits of good parenting .They are the LAST people on earth who you would go to for advice on bringing up kids.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,59-2523076,00.html

Government's inescapable responsibility for the family courts

Sir, An order sanctioning the removal of a child from the care of its family is, as one senior judge of the Family Division has observed, just about the most draconian that the court can make (report and leading article, Dec 28). The application for such an order requires careful judicial scrutiny.

For those children who have demonstrably suffered significant harm it is wholly unacceptable that it should take as long as a year for a court to determine their future. But the family courts are severely overstretched. They lack the necessary resources in terms of judicial manpower and court space. Removing the "shroud of secrecy" that is said to cloak the work of family courts might at least have the advantage of demonstrating to the public just how widespread and chronic the problem is.

That the volume and costs of care cases should have risen substantially in recent years should come as no surprise. As the Government itself has acknowledged, the level of protection that society demands for vulnerable children rises all the time. It is that factor which makes it all the more important that the courts should carry out a thorough investigation into whether children should be removed from their families into the care system. The overall average cost of £25,000 per care case is a relatively small price, compared with that of providing alternative care by the State throughout a child's minority.

The solution to the problem of increased costs on the legal aid budget does not lie in seeking to reduce the modest level of fees currently paid to those family lawyers who take on this vitally important work. It runs the risk of diverting them away into better-paid work and may leave parents and children without adequate representation.

The answer must be to face up to the reality of the situation and to provide financially for it. Quite simply, tinkering will accomplish nothing.

ANTHONY KIRK, QC
Chairman of the Family Law Bar Association

Sir, The reason that legal aid costs in some family law cases are rocketing and the costs to the public agencies involved in such cases are also going up is that the courts are now expected to handle issues and make decisions which were not envisaged as being within their compass when the system was set up some 20 years ago, and additional and different tools are required.

Increasingly in cases of care proceedings the issue is not so much the past abuse or neglect of the child as the capacity of the parent(s) to provide parenting of an adequate, minimum standard in the years to come. It is therefore more and more the practice for courts to seek professional parenting assessments, often including psychiatric reports and sometimes up to 12 weeks of observation of parent(s) and child(ren) while in residence. None of these measures comes cheap.

It is impossible to ignore the human rights of the parent(s) in any case where the separation - temporary or permanent - of the child from its parent(s) is a possible outcome. For a court to order that separation without having exhausted all sources of information and advice runs a high risk of challenge.

It is not enough for the Government to wring its hands and bemoan the situation: since it created this phenomenon it should provide the resources to pay for it.

MICHAEL BROWN
Highbridge, Somerset

Sir, In the course of my practice I have read countless psychological reports on parents whose children have been removed because they have suffered significant physical, emotional or sexual harm (or any combination of the three).

A growing proportion of today's parents have no good internal model of parenting to guide them because their formative years were blighted by parental conflict and family breakdown. Consequently their own attempts to parent children are doomed to failure. These parents are so needy themselves that they have inadequate resources from which to meet their children's needs.

The root cause of this problem cannot be addressed by paying more to foster carers or less to lawyers. It requires individuals to selflessly commit themselves to the model of family life that research and experience show to be the best way to rear well-adjusted children who can grow into competent parents.

PAUL HART
Barrister
Preston


THE MORALITY OF THINK TANK MILLIONAIRES 30 December 2006


by Nancy Levant

When customized moral codes and legislation are commissioned by councils of obscene wealth, average Joe and Jane can expect more than trouble. Think tanks have become the determiners of mankind’s future, for they are paid to implement morality and behavior laws according to the governing intentions of the world’s rich. This is a historically terrifying scenario and one that the world’s people forget over and over again. It is also a historical pattern based upon the psychology of human ignorance, which is why massive societal changes and “world wars” tend to occur in recurring patterns of about 50 years. Given a few generations, people forget the atrocities of former wars, which in turn give rise to the planning mechanisms for new and improved confiscations of the peoples’ wealth and land - or, in translation, new wars.

Depopulation of the masses and the land confiscation of global private property are the two primary goals of the elite one-world government. Private property provides wealth, liberty, and opportunity to the masses, which is abhorrent to those who believe themselves to be a higher and more intelligent species. In today’s world, this is more evident and obvious than ever before. The world’s richest people, who control international banking and transnational corporations, now fully fund all control mechanisms which affect the world’s people, land masses, watershed systems, and human health. If this doesn’t scare you, nothing ever will. One of the most terrifying trends in the age of media technology is mankind’s belief that wealth equals freedom. This belief is particularly true for media-raised Westerners. We aspire to be rich. It is a primary cultural desire. It is why we attend universities, why we buy lotto tickets, why we watch elite tell-a-vision, and why we try to emulate the rich by buying homes, automobiles, and stuff that we cannot afford. It is also why we are addicted to shopping and spoiling children. We want to be rich. We want to look rich. We want everything without the pain of debt, which to us equates to “freedom.”

This the elite know, and this is why “credit” became available to each and every adult in the United States. The problem is, in our greed and stupidity, and during our 40-year shopping spree, the elite crept into each and every one of our back doors with long laid plans to take everything we thought we had acquired; their first mission being to confiscate our homes and land based upon an absolute inability to pay our debts. I can all but guarantee you that if you carry a home mortgage and automobile(s) loan, you will lose both your house and car(s) in the very near future. The elimination of private property rights is not a conspiracy theory. It is a primary intention of the new world government to eliminate all national rights to private property. Only government and/or corporations are to be permitted to “own” property. On that note, let’s talk “corporations” for a moment. Major media is now owned by five or six corporations – only. These corporations are heavily controlled by governmental regulations. In essence, the information that the world’s people receive through mass media is “regulated.” There is no “freedom” in mass media. Mass media exists in today’s world for one purpose, and one alone - social engineering. There is no such thing as “entertainment” in today’s world. Combining the powers of governmental regulation and global mass media has, bar none, created the most dangerous entity that has ever befallen mankind, for mankind now operates in a perpetual state of reality manipulation. The elites have captured and fractured truth - globally. Corporations now “partner” with public schools. This actually means they fund public schools, which means that they control public schools. They exchange funding dollars for the implementation of “agendas.” Hence, the one-world governmental regulations and rules of conduct are now the primary educational missions of public schools – ALL public schools. This identical system fully functions, as well, in most private schools and in all universities.

Through the now familiar “merging” of corporation to corporation, the mega or transnational corporation giants then form “foundations” to 1) avoid paying taxes, and 2) to fund (buy) the new world corporate government into existence. In other words, they give huge sums of money to anyone or any NGO or any non-profit organization who will implement their system of governance, their government’s rules and regulations, and their economic siphoning system – including the elimination of private property rights and other constitutional rights. Depopulation. The problem with centralizing all global wealth - all global land and watershed systems, which includes all farming (global food supply) – is that the world’s people become serfs. This is not an exaggeration. If “government” or “corporate government” owns and controls everything people must have to survive (housing, food, water, money, health care), “people” become expensive “pests.” Now, we can surely tell ourselves that elitists are compassionate people, but that is not the history of the elite on any continent, nor in any period of history. The elites are separate from the masses. They are not of the masses, they do not live like the masses, and they would not and have never mixed with the masses. They are, self-proclaimed, above the masses – “above” meaning superior to and in leadership over the masses. Hence, the genetic data basing of mankind marches onward. When the thieving self-elevated ones find themselves outnumbered multi-billions to one, depopulation, historically, comes into play and action. I repeat, over and over and over again – we are seeing nothing new in history. However, today, we are operate in very high-tech mode. We the people have a new kind of problem, and it’s called technology-based weaponry, technology-based substance lacing and spraying, technology-based ill health and sterilization, technology-based food and water tampering, and technology-based spying systems. And, unfortunately, the elites are very serious about their personal “sustainability.” And they’re very serious about massive global population reduction. They are also scared as hell. They know that we know.

Perhaps it is too late to stop the elites and their personal government. Perhaps American and other Western peoples are okay with losing all rights. But, it is my guess that the day the TV sets go off in the West will be the day Westerners are ready to stand for freedom. Let us pray there will be enough remaining to stand. Approximately 50 million American people were aborted in the last 3.5 decades. The new “mental health” industrial complex will surely disallow reproductive rights to America’s forthcoming “mental illness” epidemic. Good thing we have civilian labor camps – no? And then there are the Baby Boomers – the most pathetic, sell-out, brown-nosing generation in the history of mankind – who will no doubt be the recipients of the wonderful pink drug used to put down dogs ever so humanely. And so to end, let us also take a moment to talk about the think tank “compassion” of the “environmental” movement. First, consider that animals have always been, and will continue to be the guinea pigs for human healthcare. Animals have been tested with every substance known to mankind, implanted with every make and model of implantable devise, and domestic animals are routinely and annually slaughtered to the tune of billions – if not trillions of critters each and every year. “Compassion” is the term used to slaughter everything from bugs and deer, to cats and dogs, to lab rats and ants. “Compassion” is demonstrated daily in beef and poultry farms – where animals live standing or sitting in un-moveable and filthy conditions. “Compassion” is demonstrated as mice tear their limbs from their bodies in inexpensive glue traps. In this nutshell, global/environmental “compassion” is the forerunner to dialectic and vicious inhumanity. Once tested and performed on animals, mankind is next. Don’t think for five seconds that euthanasia of the Boomers isn’t directly around our corners. The freaks in power, their think tank millionaire employees, and their family corporations and foundations have even managed to dialectically flip-flop the term “compassion” into the mass murder of animals. There is only one tiny degree of ethical conscience between “pest” and “person.”

The thin ice is cracking beneath us. We the people have stood by and ignored the total destruction of our children’s education system, our economic system, and our constitutional rights. We have allowed the elected leaders in this country to work against us at every turn, knowing full well that they are lying through their teeth in order to turn sovereign America into a global region. We have allowed the total destruction of American farming and our healthy food supply (genetically modified food). We have allowed the government to contaminate our water supply to the point where we now spend billions of dollars annually to drink from corporate bottled water. Let’s see if this doesn’t turn out to be another dialectic nightmare, as well. It is my understanding that the planet is to be depopulated by 2/3rds, so you better start putting two and two together. This goal, too, falls under the guise of “compassion” to animals. Yeah…right. It is ignorance – only ignorance – that destroys this nation and all others. If you allow morality to be defined by millionaires, you will, in fact, get exactly what they think you deserve. I ask the American people to step up to freedom’s plate. I ask American women to consider well what depopulation means to you and your rights as a female. Read The Cultural Devastation of American Women. I ask American men to get their faces out of tell-a-vision sets and to READ, STUDY, AND ACT to defend this nation. If this country and our freedom fall, it’s on your shoulders. Read Dr. Edwin Vieira. If YOUR children as “assessed” as “socially and emotionally” damaged by the new world public school system, it’s on your shoulders. It’s you and yours that will pay.

Books:

1. The Cultural Devastation of American Women by Nancy Levant
2. The Creature of Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin
3. Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert
4. 2020 by Niki Raapana
5. Pieces of Eight by Dr. Edwin Viera
6. The Coming Battle by M. W. Walbert
7. The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte T. Iserbyt
8. Public Schools, Public Menace by Joel Turtel
9. Cover-Up – Government Spin or Truth? by Dennis Cuddy
10. The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx
11. The Real Matrix by Steven Yates (print this series of essays from NWVs and give as gifts)

Videos:

1. America: From Freedom to Fascism by Aaron Russo
2. The International Wilderness Congress and the World Bank by George Hunt
3. Capital Crimes by Bill Still
4. America’s Choice: Liberty or Sustainable Development
5. 911 - In Plane Site

Most of these books and videos can be purchased at www.newswithviews.com. Please, help freedom survive. Give gifts of knowledge. As a politically incorrect side note, my grandparents had an enormous and very beautiful Bible. My grandmother called it “the family Bible.” Consider such a gift. It’s a life-long gift with generations of potential, and a very thoughtful gift, as well.

© 2006 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserved

Nancy Levant is a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American culture. She is the author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful timing). She is an opponent of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance by deception, political feminism, the public school system, political economics based upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality. To book an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to:

E-Mail: nlevant@juno.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy73.htm


DAVID ICKE ON MAINSTREAM UK TV 26 December 2006


DAVID ICKE:WAS HE RIGHT?

On 26 th Dec 06 Channel 5 11pm ONE whole hour on David Icke.Mainstream TV finally giving quality time to those who EXPOSE a conspiracy of the most enormous kind.

From the continued propaganda of Britains conspiratorial media we have at last seen a decent breakthrough in giving a fresh view of history and the distortions manufactured by the MASONIC/ILLUMINATI controllers.How much longer can the rest of Britains media continue to pump out the lies that aid and abet the BUSH/BLAIR mindset?

The expansion of the internet has led to a rewriting of British history that has been put in place to deceive us,allowing control of the masses through a brutal tyrannical regime.

DAVID DID A BRILLIANT JOB OF SHOWING 10 YEARS AGO THAT HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT WHAT HE WARNED US ALL ABOUT The rise of the fascist states in the UK and USA and the ILLUMINATI's plans for a NEW WORLD ORDER.

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB David Icke: Was He Right? (VIDEO)


Freemasonry: Mankind’s Death Wish 25 December 2006


Freemasonry: Mankind’s Death Wish
Henry Makow Ph.D. – November 27, 2005 (first posted January 15, 2005)

Architects of Deception a 600-page history of Freemasonry by Estonian writer Juri Lina offers profound insight into the true character of modern history.

Essentially, a dominant segment of Western society has joined the Jewish financial elite in embracing Freemasonry, a satanic philosophy that represents a death wish for civilization. They imagine somehow they will profit from the carnage and suffering caused by their "New World Order." Incredible, bizarre and depressing as it sounds, Lina writes that 300 mainly Jewish banking families have used Freemasonry as an instrument to subvert, control and degrade the Western world. This view is consistent with the 1938 NKVD interrogation of an illuminati member who names many of these banking families and confirms that Freemasons are expendable tools. (See my two-part "Rothschild Conducts Red Symphony" and "Terminated! Freemasonry's Final Revelation")

Based on the archives of the powerful French Grand Orient Lodge, captured in June 1940 and later made public by the Russians, Lina details how Freemasonry has conspired for world domination and orchestrated all major revolutions and wars in the modern era. (Lina, p.332) Masons, often Jewish, are responsible for Communism, Zionism, Socialism, Liberalism (and Feminism.) They love big government because it is the ultimate monopoly. "World government" (dictatorship) is the final trophy. This is the vision behind 9-11 and the "War on Terror."

These "world revolutionary" "progressive" movements all mirror Lucifer's rebellion against God and nature which is at the heart of Freemasonry. They ensnare millions of gullible idealists by promising a utopia based on materialism and "reason" and dedicated to "liberty, equality and fraternity," "public ownership" or some other idealistic sounding claptrap. It's called bait-and-switch. According to Lina: "The primary aim of modern freemasonry is to build the New World Order, a spiritual Temple of Solomon, where non-members are nothing but slaves [and] ...where human beings would be sacrificed to Yahweh." Lina cites numerous Jewish sources that claim Freemasonry is based on Judaism and is "the executive political organ of the Jewish financial elite."

The common goal of these Masonic inspired movements is to undermine race, religion, nation and family ("all collective forces except our own") by promoting social division, self indulgence and "tolerance" i.e. miscegenation, atheism, nihilism, global-ism, sexual "liberation" and homosexuality thereby reducing humanity to a uniform dysfunctional and malleable mush. Lina and others who attempt to alert humanity to its real condition are routinely slandered as anti-Semitic, fascist, and right wing "haters" by people indirectly employed by the bankers. This tactic shields the conspirators from scrutiny and makes discussion of our grim predicament impossible. I am a Jew. I am not part of this banking monopoly, nor is the majority of Jews. By way of analogy, the mafia is considered mostly Italian but most Italians do not belong to the mafia.

Italians don't viciously attack opponents of organized crime and call them "racists" and "hate mongers". That would look awfully suspicious. Jews compromise themselves by their defence of the Masonic bankers and their perverse vision for humanity. My four grandparents perished in the Jewish holocaust. I demand to know the real reason they were murdered. London-based Masonic bankers and their cronies brought Hitler to power in order to provoke war, control Stalin, and justify the creation of Israel. They betrayed non-Zionist Jews and let them perish. They are using the Jewish people in the same way they use the Masons.

The Illuminist Conspiracy

We cannot understand the modern world unless we appreciate that it is the result of the Masonic conspiracy. People scoff yet the evidence stares them in the face every day. The Great Seal of the United States on every dollar bill is a Masonic symbol. There are 33 steps on the side of the pyramid representing the 33 degrees of Freemasonry. The Masons established the United States as a base to advance their goal of world supremacy. According to "The Temple and the Lodge" the Masonic English generals let their American "brothers" win a seeming independence. (Baigent & Leigh, pp.252ff.) Similarly, the emblem of the United Nations is also a Masonic symbol. The world is caught in a grid consisting of 33 spaces surrounded by acacia leaves, which signifies intense activity in masonry. (215)

Three-quarters of US presidents in the Twentieth Century were high-level Masons. Both Bush and Kerry are Masons (Skull and Bones.) FDR, Churchill, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin were masons. Most Zionist leaders were and are Masons. Gerhard Schroeder, Jacques Chirac and Tony Blair are Freemasons. So is Sadaam Hussein, which suggests the Iraq war could be a sadistic charade. There are over six-million Masons in 32,000 lodges around the world including 2.5 million in the US. In 1929, 67% of Members of Congress were Masons. There are 500,000 Masons in England with more than 100 lodges in the City of London alone. More than five per cent of British judges are Masons.

Lina believes, "Freemasonry plays the same role in Western society as the Communist Party did in the Soviet Union. Without belonging to the freemasonry there is no chance of a fast career, regardless of how talented one is." Keep in mind that Communism was a Masonic enterprize and the puzzle starts to take shape. Lina says Freemasons not only control politics but also virtually every sector of Western society, including science and culture. "The present cultural life has become virtually unconscious," he writes. "We have witnessed the beginning of cultural senility." In his pamphlet "The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution" (1929) the Freemason H.G. Wells describes an "open secret society" consisting of society's leading men operating as a hidden force to secure world resources, reduce population through war and replace the nation state with world dictatorship.

Masonic ideology

Human beings are naturally attracted to good and repulsed by evil. Thus evil always represents itself as good. To the public, and its own lower ranks, Freemasonry pretends to be dedicated to "making good men better", humanism, tolerance, Christianity and you-name-it. If this were true, would they have to extract vows of secrecy from members on pain of slitting their throat? Would they have been condemned by many Popes and banned from numerous countries? (84) I do not wish to impugn the many good and decent men in the lower "Blue Degrees" who are unaware of Freemasonry's true function and character. But there is abundant evidence and testimony that Freemasonry is a satanic cult dedicated to the worship of death. (134-138)

For example, when the Italian Grand Orient Lodge was evicted from the Palazzio Bourghese in Rome in 1893, the owner found a shrine dedicated to Satan. The Italian freemasons published a newspaper in the 1880's where they admitted time and again, "Our leader is Satan!" (135) The Masons also admit to having a revolutionary political agenda. Typical of statements Lina cites from Masonic publications is the following from a German magazine in 1910:" The driving thought is at all times focused on destruction and annihilation, because the power of this great secret society can only rise from the ruins of the existing order of society." (272) Conclusion The Illuminist Conspiracy is the brake responsible for humanity's arrested development. Mankind resembles a person suffering from a serious disease and sinking into a coma. Juri Lina has written a courageous book to revive us. He says we face "the largest spiritual crisis in the history of mankind...They have taken our history, our dignity, our wisdom and our honor, sense of responsibility, spiritual insights and our traditions." We are partly to blame, he says: "We have failed to act against the Masonic madness due to our enormous gullibility. We have been totally fooled and ignored the warning signals." (274)

He ends on a hopeful note, saying evil is dysfunctional and inevitably destroys itself. "Freemasonry carries within it the seeds of its own destruction." (563) Wars, revolutions and depressions are all part of a "revolutionary" process designed to frogmarch humanity to "world government" under the rubric of Freemasonry which may be a surrogate for an alliance of occult Jewish and gentile financial elites. Their "self-destruction" seems to be our best hope since the public is too feckless and weak to resist.

Architects of Deception can be purchased for US$50 by emailing Jyri Lina at jyrilina@yahoo.com

The book also contains many gossipy nuggets such as Hitler had a son; Lenin was a homosexual; Castro is Jewish and a multimillionaire; and Henry Kissinger was/is a Soviet agent! He says the Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, Rotary and Lions Clubs were founded by Masons. Golf was invented by Masons and has great significance to them Albert Pike, Head of Scottish Rite, on the great hoodwinking in "Morals and Dogma" (1871): "Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled ..."

"The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry." (pp. 104, 105 & 819)

See also Lyndon Larouche Real History of Satanism SEE Masonic Bible Used at Presidential Inaugurations See also my "Making the World Safe...for Bankers"

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3862


HOW MASONS CONTROL THE UK PRESS 25 December 2006


MASONS SELDOM IF EVER GET BAD PRESS DO THEY? WE WONDER WHY?IN FACT THEY ARE SELDOM IF EVER MENTIONED IN BRITAINS MEDIA

http://www.londonfreemasonry.com/

Calling all journalists…

How many journalists and PR practitioners are there among the thousands of London Masons? Your professional expertise will be useful as we try to raise Freemasonry's profile in and around London.

If you have experience as a journalist working in the local and regional press, or as a PR specialist dealing with journalists, WBro Nick Carter would love to hear from you. He is a former newspaper and magazine editor, now running a PR and publishing consultancy and helping Metropolitan Grand Lodge's PR team.

Please email us or call Nick on 01865 744995.


Throne out 22 December 2006


Throne Out
Republic 'best place to live in world'
Monarchists often argue that the without the monarchy the UK would be doomed. Either our tourism industry would collapse, we'd suffer political instability, or our national identity would disappear. more >>

Charles' Tax Avoidance Questioned
Unlike us poor saps, the Windsors get to decide how much tax they pay, if any. Some MPs are now asking why the business that generates Charles' income should have closed accounts (unlike every other business in the UK). 24 Oct 2006 view / make comments

Diana Inquiry finds new witnesses
The Daily Mail reports: "Astonishing claims by new witnesses are being examined by British detectives investigating Diana's death. They seem incredible. But if true, they could rock the Royal Family to its foundations." 20 Jun 2006 view / make comments

Charles's Great Uncle in Military Coup Plots
Royal family involved in plots to snuff out democracy, arrest elected leaders and establish military dictatorship. 15 Mar 2006 view / make comments

Tory Leader Calls for Queen to be Stripped of Powers
New Conservative Party leader David Cameron has called for the Queen to be stripped of many of her traditional powers. 11 Feb 2006 view / make comments

Archives

Charles Lectures on Global Warming 27 Oct 2005
When Harry's Dad Met Di 25 Sep 2005
Royal Finances Under Scrutiny 28 Jul 2005
Bed-Hopping Royal Gets Found Out 12 Jul 2005
Dunce Harry Failed Basic IT Test 19 Apr 2005
ThroneOut Mint Presents the Charles & Di Mug Conversion Kit 10 Feb 2005
Prince Charles to Marry Camilla 10 Feb 2005
Harry in New Fancy Dress Shocker 14 Jan 2005
Harry in Military Uniform Shocker 13 Jan 2005
Queen's Cousin Nicked for Speeding 23 Dec 2004
Prince Charles - Don't Get Ideas Above Your Station 19 Nov 2004
Harry Demonstrates Military Credentials 21 Oct 2004
Harry Accused of Cheating in A-Levels 10 Oct 2004
Queen Donates Money to Beslan Fund 11 Sep 2004
Diana Memorial Fountain closed after three are injured 23 Jul 2004
Former Archbishop says Charles should Marry Camilla 2 Jun 2004
How Rich are the Royal Family? 5 May 2004
Royal Planes May Lose Union Jack 16 Apr 2004
New UK Citizenship Ceremony 26 Feb 2004
Anti Monarchy Protesters Win Damages 5 Feb 2004
Mad King George Wasn't Mad According to Charles 4 Feb 2004
Queen Bashes Pheasant to Death and Becomes Patron of ThroneOut 28 Jan 2004
Diana Claimed Charles Would Kill Her in a Car Accident 6 Jan 2004
Australian Republican is the True King of England 6 Jan 2004
Santa's Little Headcase 24 Dec 2003
Windsors 'Nobble' Diana Inquest 22 Dec 2003
Queen Bans Mirror from Palace 5 Dec 2003
This is What Happens When People Get to Vote 27 Nov 2003
The Royal Scandal. What we can and can't tell you. 6 Nov 2003
'The Genetically Modified Prince' 3 Nov 2003
'Smithgate' could be end of the monarchy 28 Oct 2003
New Queen Sculptor Previously Worked for Saddam 27 Oct 2003
Burrell Claims Diana Feared Car Crash Plot 20 Oct 2003
Dutch Prince to Marry 13 Oct 2003
Oath to Queen Discriminatory 3 Oct 2003
Another Royal House in Flames 20 Aug 2003
Harry gets B & D in A-levels 14 Aug 2003
ThroneOut Mint Presents First of its High-Quality Diana Collectables 14 Jul 2003
William Drives like a Wanker 17 Jun 2003
Windsors Award Themselves More Titles 3 Jun 2003
Harry Leads School Military Parade 28 May 2003
Members of Scottish Parliament protest over Oath to Queen 7 May 2003
Edward and Sophie to serve up another sponger 6 May 2003
Taxpayer to pay £4.5million to makeover Charles' House 2 May 2003
Queen Sends Message to Our Troops 20 Mar 2003
Whitewash at the Palace 13 Mar 2003
Prince Charles Needs Hernia Operation after Stretching Awkwardly While Laying Hedges 13 Mar 2003
Jenny Bond to Get 'Proper' Job 12 Mar 2003
Its Official: Media DO cover up Royal Scandals 30 Jan 2003
Hewitt Plans to Clear His Debts 9 Jan 2003
Charles urges 'buy British' whilst he buys German 3 Jan 2003
Philip removes treasures from Britannia 23 Dec 2002
Queen to 'Pay Rent' for Kents 18 Dec 2002
Newspaper ''Tried to Obtain Harry's DNA'' 16 Dec 2002
Second Butler Trial Collapses 3 Dec 2002
Anne Slapped on Wrist after Dogs Maul Kids 21 Nov 2002
There WILL be a whitewash at the Palace. 13 Nov 2002
Italian Newspaper names alleged Gay Rapist 11 Nov 2002
Media Feeding Frenzy Continues... 11 Nov 2002
Burrell Trial Collapses after Queen 'Regains' Memory 4 Nov 2002
Paul Burrell's Price is Right 25 Oct 2002
Anne's Dog Attacks Couple 30 Sep 2002
Charles Gives Up 'Apolitical' Stance 25 Sep 2002
Charles 'to emigrate' if hunting is banned 23 Sep 2002
'Harry has photo taken' shocker 16 Sep 2002
Honours List Reveals why the Beeb Doesn't Report News 5 Aug 2002
Prince Phil says 'ban tourists' from London 30 Jul 2002
Andrew 'Let off' Speeding Ticket 23 Jul 2002
Toadie Tony To Give Jubilee Gift to Queen 15 Jul 2002
Pressure Mounts on Scrounging Kents 17 Jun 2002
Government Takes Step To Cover-up Royal Scandal 6 Jun 2002
Buckingham Palace Burns on Jubilee! 3 Jun 2002
Royals Hammer British Taxpayers Again 22 May 2002
Royals Attempt Tax Fiddle Cover-up 10 May 2002
Queen to Avoid Tax on QM Legacy 7 May 2002
Queen Mother Funeral is Tonic for the Country 13 Apr 2002
New Bible: Queen Mother 'Bigger than Jesus' 5 Apr 2002
I wouldn't even wipe my arse on the Mirror Newspaper! 3 Apr 2002
Queen Mother's Obituary Part II 31 Mar 2002
Royals to Get Free Ride 21 Mar 2002
Edward and Sophie quit day jobs to become full-time parasites 2 Mar 2002
Queen's Australian Governor in Trouble 25 Feb 2002
Scotland Bans Foxhunting 14 Feb 2002
Princess Margaret - Obituary 9 Feb 2002
Charles Took Money From Enron 5 Feb 2002
Jubilee will be a Flop 29 Jan 2002
British Taxpayers to Foot the Bill for New Royal Train 29 Jan 2002
Edward Fakes More Than Just his Sexuality 23 Jan 2002
Royal Parentage in Question 16 Jan 2002
Harry Spends our Cash on Hash 14 Jan 2002
Royals to Produce New Gameshow 19 Jul 2001
Nepalese Royal Family's Five-a-Side Football Team in Crisis 10 Jul 2001
Missing Marbles Relic to be Returned to Greeks 23 May 2001
Queen Removed from Last Remaining Royalist Banknote 17 May 2001
Q & A: How Phil got those Gongs 30 Nov 2000
Latest Odds from A Major UK Bookmaker with No Sense of Humour 8 Sep 2000
Second Jobs of the Royals 23 Jul 2000
New Brown-Nose-Laureate 14 Jun 2000
What does ITN stand for? 5 Apr 2000
What are the Royals Trying to Hide? 1 Mar 2000
Member of Queen's Staff Sacked in Poison "Scare" 20 Feb 2000
Harrods Loses Royal Warrant 15 Jan 2000
The Queen Mother's Obituary 3 Sep 1999
BBC Vindictively Refuses to Waste our Money 17 Jul 1999
Who Decides What's News? - Manics Stand Up Charles 26 May 1999


Whitewashed murder Of Princess Diana 22 December 2006


SPEAK NO TRUTH, SEE NO TRUTH, HEAR NO TRUTH ...

The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Saturday In The Wake Of The Official 'Inquiry' That Whitewashed The Murder Of Princess Diana 'In the late 1980s, with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with her personal detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a motorcycle 'accident' in 1988. By 1990, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day, about this time, she went rushing into Christine Fitzgerald's healing centre in London in a terrible state. Christine told me what happened next:

'She was crying hysterically and I said "What's a matter?" You know it was dog's died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her Rescue Remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what's going on. "I can't believe it, I can't believe it, they killed him", she sobbed. I said: "Who did they kill?" She told me about her affair with the detective [Barry Mannakee] and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now she knows the royal family killed him because Prince Charles' senior detective had just told her that if she didn't cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she should not think that she was indispensable, either.'

'The royal family are figureheads for the established order that includes those controlling the government, 'law enforcement' and the intelligence networks. This is the cabal which, with others in France, killed Diana.'


Scotlands Mengeles Chisholm quits 21 December 2006


Our organisations challenged the Scottish Executive on this MONSTER Chisholm and we released this press release in October to contacts and media worldwide

Malcolm Chisholm Scotlands Mengeles

More than one thousand MEN have been convicted by a masonic kangaroo court in Glasgow Sheriff court. Men accused by bitter ex partners making, in many cases, spurious allegations of abuse which may include raised voices and being criminalized by a bunch of hand picked masonic judges acting as lackies for the crown. That crown then stealing these mens children ,homes,business's and assets similar to the despicable goldigger Heather Mills and her attempts to force more money from her ex husband Paul McCartney who she married to prop up her finances using allegations of abuse . These courts are causing major human rights abuses by failing to ensure a jury is being used to convict men and also many of them wont even get representation in that kangaroo court established by Scotlands equivalent to Mengeles Malcolm Chisholm .

As health minister he was responsible for using the mental health act to chemically lobotomize our member George Farquhar,Dixie Deans and ultimately murder Andy McCardle in Carstairs concentration camp. Malcolm Chisholm and his Domestic abuse MOB are using the most sinister human rights abuses to line the pockets of the corrupt Scottish Crown while the top crook Colin Boyd was in charge.He was responsible with Chisholm for the psychological abuses of Shirley McKie. While the Scottish media continue to support these MASONIC monsters we will continue to see diabolical acts similar to Hitlers mob by distorting the real truth of what is going on in Scotland. They have NEVER reported Chisholms part in abusing innocent men using the evil Scottish mental health act. CHISHOLM like BLUNKETT is a MASONIC MONSTER and his vile acts and actions will not continue even with the support of his masonic pals at most of the Scottish media groups he uses to impose these monstrous evils.
=======================================
Minister quits after Trident vote

Communities Minister Malcolm Chisholm has resigned from the Scottish government after voting with the SNP over the replacement of Trident. He was one of four Labour members who supported the SNP's motion opposing the replacement of the nuclear submarines. In his resignation letter, Mr Chisholm said he knew his vote had made his position untenable.

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6201737.stm


BRITISH MEDIA LICENCED TO CHILL 20 December 2006


If after reading a British newspaper or watching a British TV news programme you are left feeling cold ,you may wonder why the media seem to paint a very different picture of whats going on in the UK than what is actually happening.

From years of gathering evidence from the many victims of the MONSTERS running the UK ,our organisations can give some very good reasons why the facade our media portray the UK in, hides the most sinister goings on behind the scenes .

1.The bulk of British media are in the first instance licenced ,effectively that licence can be removed or not renewed if they fail to follow the course the MASONIC CONTROLLERS require,that would be to ensure the NEW WORLD ORDER direction is adhered to.The agenda to create a ONE world government has been progressing for years under the ILLUMINATI/MASONIC/BILDERBERG influence. It has been funded by masonic bankers and requires the full support of the self appointed high flyers of the UK ,most if not all of them having sold their souls to the devil via secret society mobsters,and they are ALL behind the political and legal changes required to IMPOSE these onto a naive brainwashed British populous.

2.The British media has been controlled,for eons, by members of the notoriously corrupt Law Societies of England,Scotland,Wales and Ireland.In the USA the corrupt bar associations of America also ensure the media adhere to the NEW WORLD ORDER plans where much of the financial control is procured by masonic controllers / corrupt masonic judges in civil courts on both sides of the Atlantic.The judiciaries of the UK and USA maybe the most corrupt anywhere on earth due to the ability to use feminist/masonic family law to destroy families in particular fathers on a grand scale NEVER JURIES.Women from third world countries are desperate to marry a western(UK and USA) man because they know how lucrative divorce has been made by the utter corruption operating in both countries civil legal systems .

Most of it seldom reported in the media, to protect the masonic controllers, who use CIVIL law courts in the USA and UK to prop up the monolithic masonic coffers.One trip to any British court on a civil matter can almost guarantee bankruptcy and the repossession of your land,business,property and any other assets you have managed to accumulate in your lifetime of work,children will also be stolen if you are in the star chamber secretive family courts.Decent mens suicides are rife when their lives are ruined by the legal monsters controlling our courts.

3.The British media are also owned by rich media types most of them if not all members of the illuminati/masons/royalist cliche.How many ordinary individuals could acquire a national newspaper or TV station ?These require huge investments and ensure the SYSTEM is protected from EXPOSURE using MASONIC CONTROL and BLACKMAIL.Every day of the week you can be sure at least 10% or more of the British media is dedicated to promoting the richest dynasty in the world.

There is a regular section in most of the press of a collage of images of TALENTED actors,musicians and artists and tagged on are images of the establishment who's only claim to fame are that they have inherited vast fortunes from the theft by their forefathers during the rape and pillage of the world under the brutal and tyrannical reign of the British Empire.

That same mindset can STILL be found in every major publishing house ,legal office,police headquarters ,courts,banking headquarters and government head offices the length and breadth of Britain ,all of them under the MASONIC CONTROLLERS direction. Any reasonable person can see Britain is far from democratic but run by a brutal fascist regime acting as a shadow government who can't get away with sending us to the gallows anymore to suppress and oppress British citizens .

However they have new ways of subtly psychologically torturing and murdering British citizens using psychiatric wards, that first steal a victims mind and when they are sufficiently suppressed an ACCIDENT occurs that finishes them off .Some of our own members have undergone such despicable and evil treatment at the hands of monsters controlling Britain as a self appointed elite oligarchy.Hitlers spirit is alive and well in every area of British life thanks to the continuing propaganda being fed to us through our national media.

It is only recent change in technology that will ensure the lies cannot and will not continue,owners and their editors will continue to be exposed for promoting that EVIL regime and failing to inform the British public of the REAL truth of what is going on behind Britains civilized facade.


Judges gravitate towards corruption 20 December 2006


One of the wisest men of corruption once said, "If you are going to steal ... steal big." By some distorted sense of propriety, these select judges seemed to gravitate toward petty corruption. Whether their motivation was the misbelief that such instances would go undetected, or, if detected, unpunished, is not provable. But the triviality of their extrajudicial activities does not detract from the corrosive effect on their respective communities and the entire judicial system.

First, consider the Missouri judge, whose family represented the leadership politically and legally in its Clay County community. Despite an indictment following an investigation of his court records, the magistrate sought office again only to be miserably defeated. He was subsequently indicted for income tax evasion and sentenced to eight years in prison. And, as a reminder that abuse of judicial office is not new, witness the distinguished federal judge from Florida, who after being impeached by the United States Senate, had to be forceably evicted from his office by U.S. marshals. He had forgotten to stop practicing law while judging cases affecting his clients.

Notwithstanding the higher rank of those other accused judges in Oklahoma, a county judge was impeached by that state's legislature a few years ago for his prolific waiver of rules concerning marriage licenses, blood tests and waiting periods. The Oklahoma Bar Association also frowned on the money he received from those waivers.

A more serious incident involved a trial judge from Virginia, convicted recently of forgery and larceny. From New Jersey, the bastion of juridical intrigue, comes the judge whose "oversight" in filing tax returns for five years resulted in his conviction by a federal court.

A more imaginative though less tactful judge in Georgia organized a protection racket for those appearing before him. And, determined not to be outclassed by the neighboring state of New Jersey, New York has for several decades devoted itself to the production, elevation, and ultimate conviction of a large array of jurists from throughout the state. When Judge Rudich was removed from the bench, he claimed he was vindicated because the charge had been delinquency and not corruption. His lawyer announced a "clear-cut victory."

The involvement of judges with bail bonds is nothing new. A successful bondsman can always be counted on to guide large campaign contributions, legal and otherwise, each time a judge offers himself to the public. The common fraternization of bondsmen and judges has been a sore point with bar associations in most states for several years. Recently in Illinois, a particularly blatant case was discovered. Judge Louis Kizas climaxed the issue by pleading guilty to fifteen counts of official misconduct so that the bribery and conspiracy charges against him would be dismissed.

Payoffs from litigants, petty bribes, unauthorized loans from estates and, in one case, shoplifting, make up the list of comparatively trivial offenses that destroyed several judges who offered bargain prices for their friendship, counsel and favors.

http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/finestjudges_03a.htm


Americas's Black-Robed Mafia 20 December 2006


Those who claim there is no Mafia in this country are either disastrously ignorant or members in good standing. Organized crime cannot function without "organized justice."

In 1972, a trio of judges from New York and Massachusetts was implicated in a Senate crime investigation. All were accused of bribery. One was disbarred, one resigned and one is still sitting.

A federal investigation recently resulted in a score of indictments of New Jersey officials. Mayors, councilmen and judges were charged with bribery, conspiracy and tax evasion. One judge went to prison, and another returned to a city job, off the bench, where he has again been indicted.

In the Midwest, a trial judge was repeatedly lenient in sentencing members of a particular burglary ring and then was charged with being the ringleader himself. To lead their nefarious double lives, the black-robed Mafia abuses court personnel and compromises innocent colleagues. And how many more members are still to be discovered?


The High Cost of Justice 20 December 2006


The insatiable greed of members of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma brought about one of the most colossal scandals in contemporary American history. The story was suppressed in many communities by those officials who felt that emphasis placed on the barefaced bribery of the justices of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma could undermine the state's entire judicial system. They were right. Oklahoma jurisprudence has not been the same since.

In 1972, one of New York's most honored political leaders was about to climax a distinguished career of public service by ascending to the supreme court of that state. Between the time of his election and the swearing-in ceremonies, he was indicted and later convicted of extensive and expensive felonies.

The United States has come a long way in eliminating the double standard of justice that for too many generations prevented blacks, browns and the poor from a fair shake in court. The irony is that, while we have appointed more public defenders and sponsored more programs for the poor, we have been derelict in safeguarding communities from those who profit from justice for sale. The real double standard today is between those who appear in court legitimately and those who have bought their verdict before the trial. From 1912 to 1973, the pattern of corruption never varied. It only intensified.


The Finest Judges Money Can Buy 20 December 2006


AND OTHER FORMS OF JUDICIAL POLLUTION

Published in 1973, this book by Charles R. Ashman documents 74cases of judges who took bribes, kickbacks and payoffs, and who appointed relatives and political cronies to lucrative positions as receivers and executors who in turn bled the resources of near-bankrupt corporations and estates for personal gain.

Prologue American justice is choking on judicial pollution. The following cases are documented proof that it is no longer a question of occasional corruption, but a decided pattern of conflicts of interest, chronic bribery, profound abuse of office, loathsome nepotism, infamous sexual perversions and pernicious payoffs. The American public can no longer retain an attitude of vacant apathy as incorrigible corruption destroys the effectiveness of our system of justice. So what else is new!

There are many in life whose expertise and integrity we take for granted. At least we don't risk challenging them while they are doing their thing. The doctor in surgery, the lawyer in court, the TV repairman and the mother all escape stern scrutiny either because we are brainwashed as to their superiority or embarrassed to ask a question.

But one group in our society epitomizes the mysticism of superiority. The courtroom is his dominion. Our lives and property are his jurisdiction. We robe him in black and announce his arrival in medieval French incantations. He is physically elevated amidst ceremonial architecture to further enhance his exalted status in life. He presides. He listens. He sleeps. He administers. He punishes instantly for any minor deviation from the protocol of his sanctimonious court or any insult to his person, and he assumes an imperial air when he sentences. No one in our society, including the president, exercises equal summary power or more censorial prerogatives.

Unfortunately, we have never taken the trouble to establish an effective way to select judges. First, we have never been able to agree whether the public is intelligent enough to sift through political promises and elect qualified men and women to judge us, or whether other officials we've elected should be given the right to appoint the proprietors of justice. Second, even among those who have agreed whether elected or appointed judges are better, the methods of selection vary. No judge is outrageously corrupt by himself. For every judge that money can buy there must be buyers and brokers. Most of the judicial corrupters are relatives of judges, practicing lawyers or their predatory intermediaries. All the bribes paid or tendered in any one year could undoubtedly eliminate much of the poverty that breeds the crimes that outrage America. And the cost of exposing and trying corrupt judges compounds society's debt.

In this country, we believe, or at least claim to believe, in equality before the law. But those who have the money or the contacts, or both, exert a judicial pressure that eliminates equality and promotes a double standard of justice. For there are those who stand before the bar relying only on their lawyers and their hopes. And there are those whose cases are more clandestinely and hurriedly resolved by a fix.

In 1924, the American Bar Association promulgated the Canons of Judicial Ethics. Those appointed by Chief Justice William Howard Taft preambled their juridic decree by declaring that "ethical standards tend to become habits of life" and set forth a "reminder for judges indicating what the public has a right to expect from them." The judicial canons were merely the codification of moral guidelines that date back at least to Deuteronomy: "Thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift; for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous." Unfortunately, since loading, the canons have fired mostly blanks.

We can no longer dismiss cases of corruption on the bench as isolated indiscretions. There are too many, too often. This book describes over seventy classic examples of judicial pollution. Unfortunately, for each case discussed there is a handful we have not included, and for each handful not included, there are scores yet undiscovered.

Witness the dignified New England judge who paid the fine for a defendant appearing before him and then took him home for a sexual encounter - a peccadillo which the judge admitted. And, of course, there was the Louisiana judge who presided at the Kennedy-Shaw conspiracy trial. The jurist was later arrested for pimping, showing pornographic films, gambling and the rest. Scandal shattered the quiet life of the people of Oklahoma a few years ago when the majority of their own supreme court was convicted of having shamelessly wholesaled justice for years.

Recently, a former governor who had been appointed to the second highest appellate court in the nation was convicted and disgraced in Illinois. Judge Kerner had been the pinnacle of integrity, or at least he had appeared to be.

This past year, one of New York's most distinguished statesmen climaxed his career of public service by his election to that state's supreme court. Weeks before he was to be sworn in, justice-elect Seymour R. Thaler was indicted for "fencing" stolen United States Treasury bills worth a few hundred thousand dollars. Thus, the citizens of New York were denied the unique experience of Thaler's judicial pronouncements.

The black-robed Mafia is an even more mercenary intrusion in American justice than its Sicilian counterpart. Among the finest judges money can buy are those who have peddled justice for payoffs and yielded to pressure from organized crime and other "benevolent fraternities." One of the most common offenses among judges who enforce laws one day and ignore laws the next, is income tax evasion. Their defenses are novel. In one case, the judge claimed he was so busy trying cases that he simply forgot to pay his taxes for five years.

Scandalous corruption seems to be contagious among judges in certain states. Several members of the Oklahoma Supreme Court were charged with bribery, income tax evasion and conspiracy to bribe each other. And similar patterns may be noted in New York, New Jersey and Illinois. Certainly the most shocking aspect of "the finest judges money can buy" is the casual reaction of the public and our state and federal officials to judicial corruption. It seems as if there is a reluctance to punish any judge for fear that the public will lose its respect for all judges. Thus, the punishment is directed at the community at large in the form of such mild disciplinary action against the guilty, that numerous judges found guilty of serious offenses continue to sit in judgment of us.

There has recently been a rash of cases involving jurists accused of abusing criminal bond procedures for their bailbondsmen friends. In no less than fifteen states, investigations have revealed violations of state bonding practices that enable the bondsmen, in effect, to determine if an accused criminal should be released. On June 11, 1973 the California Judicial Qualification Commission recommended only censure of two Los Angeles County judges who issued numerous blank, presigned release forms to close friends who happen to be bondsmen.

A seventeen-page report urged the California Supreme Court to "severely and publicly censure" Superior Judge Leopoldo Sanchez, and merely "censure" Municipal Judge Antonio E. Chavez.

Judge Sanchez remained on full salary but was not allowed to sit on the bench while his case was under study. And now, if the Supreme Court follows the Commission's recommendation, the effect will be that Sanchez received a six-month paid holiday as a result of the censure. In the meantime, he is back on the bench.

The Commission's investigation proved that a Los Angeles bondsman named Joey Barnum had used, and sold to other bondsmen, hundreds of blank forms signed by his friend, Judge Sanchez. The Judicial Commission decided that "what Judge Sanchez did appears to be the result of incredibly bad judgment and his inability to say 'no' to his friend, Joey Barnum."

One California lawyer reacted by promising that the next time he has a case in front of judge Sanchez he will offer a novel defense. He will argue that his client "just could not say 'no' to his friend and that is why he robbed the bank."

On occasion, judges have even been charged with crimes resulting in death. At the turn of the century, one of Alabama's more popular circuit judges, John B. Tally, conspired with his family to murder a neighbor who was having an affair with the judge's sister-in-law. The judge and his brother-in-law gunned down the offender and utilized the then modern railroad and telegraph to cover their tracks. The Supreme Court of Alabama, in a confusing decision, ruled that the popular Scottsboro jurist had not neglected his judicial duties by participating in the murder plot. Nevertheless, they found him guilty of aiding and abetting and removed him from the bench.

Politicians have attempted to impeach members of the Supreme Court of the United States. On only one occasion were they successful, but there have been resignations and lingering doubts. Some people are still devoted to impeaching Justice William O. Douglas.

And then there are those judges, named in this book, who are still sitting in judgment of others. This is so despite the judges' administrative and judicial problems. Somewhere, there is a former defendant whose right to freedom may have been abused by one of these judges now revealed to be a criminal himself. After talking with the finest judges money cannot buy and the lawyers who appear before them, we believe there is an answer.

Sir Francis Bacon authored much of the philosophy of temperate justice when he dominated the English Renaissance as the most gifted and eloquent of that nation's judges. He was revered as infallible while serving as Attorney General and Lord Chancellor of England. His ethical utterings are preserved in legal textbooks, and his words are chiseled on the cornerstones of palaces of justice throughout the world.

Unfortunately, the chiseling did not stop there. Three years after he attained the highest judicial position in England, Sir Francis Bacon - philosopher, scientist and jurist extraordinaire - was impeached. The House of Commons determined he had accepted at least twenty-eight bribes. His defense was novel. Bacon claimed he took bribes from both sides, and so never allowed dirty money to influence his decisions. Parliament wasn't impressed, and he was sentenced to the Tower of London. King James, in a moment of melancholy, pardoned him, but Bacon never returned to Parliament and was not allowed "within the verge of the court." Five years later, he caught a cold while experimenting in refrigeration: he was stuffing a goose with snow. He died, but his humiliation and corruption live on.


Why is Britain so corrupt in high office? 18 December 2006


The main reason is due to the utter failure of Britains masonic chief constables to do their job properly.Anyone who has tried to get the UK police to investigate ANYTHING will know how resistant they are to that basic task of protecting citizens of the UK.

Once you realise that the MASONIC CONTROLLERS who run the police via their lackies Britains chief constables you will understand why they have more pressing issues.Not for the common man or woman are they there to protect.They are there primarily to protect the richest dynasty in the world and all other arms of that protection network such as the judiciary,bankers and all who are involved in law enforcement to the detriment of the vast majority of the UK's population.While they also brutally treat the poor for the most meagre of infringements of the law. We can say with certainty, from evidence that has been gathered over a substantial period of time,that the police fail time and again to catch criminals who are part of the masonic structure they are all tied into.

That means that all those who have sworn secret society oaths (which includes Tony Blair) fall outside their remit and effectively are getting way with MURDER. We know from previous cases that all sorts of serious crimes that seldom if EVER are cleared up by British police have been carried out by their masonic lodge pals who hide inside their protective barrier something British police seldom cross to search for criminal activities.A recent case of the shoe rapist who carried out more than 100 rapes probably evaded capture for so long thanks to his masonic connections.

When you consider that Britains royalty are almost utterly immune from prosecution there is a pecking order down from the judiciary who ensure any legal actions against the UK's monarchy are quashed at the first hurdle. Chiefs of police also resist any pressure to criminalize any establishment figure or senior politician(all senior politicians swear those oaths prior to selection into high office and in turn receive that protection). Lawyers are another arm of the high office protectors and masonic controllers deciding which cases will or will not get into court and are successful. By each one of these groups protecting the top ,in return they are protected by having regulatory bodies tied into the mechanism which gives an illusion of accountability when in fact seldom if ever would there be any likelyhood of prosecution against any of those charged with protecting the interests of the richest dynasty in the world.

Britains corruption reaches into the very heart of government ONLY because every single person given a position of high office has sworn masonic oaths of allegiance and have opened themselves up to BLACKMAIL by the initiations that are part and parcel of their system of control.Seldom will any break rank as they would be destroyed by what lies within the little black books of the masonic controllers who ensure total allegiance to this sinister system using threats of blackmail and even death for breaking those blood curdling oaths.


HOW SCOTLAND HAS BEEN STITCHED UP BY A LEGAL MONOPOLY 18 December 2006


Freedom of information, the law and the public purse
by Paul Rogerson

The Scottish Executive has appointed one of the nation's most eminent advocates to try and block the release of sensitive documents that could explain why Scotland's legal services market has never been opened up to greater competition. Richard Keen QC's fees, which are understood to be as high as £6000 a day, will be met by the taxpayer.

However, ministers are still refusing to say why they are spending so much public money to thwart the release of information on a subject which is no longer a political hot potato. The landmark case – the bill for which could run into six figures – begins in the Court of Session tomorrow.

Last year Bill Alexander, a longstanding campaigner for wider consumer access to legal services, used freedom of information legislation to seek disclosure of ministerial correspondence and memoranda from the last decade concerning the enduring ban on people other than solicitors and advocates being paid to represent clients in the Scottish courts. Sixteen years have passed since sections 25-29 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1990 should have abolished the ban on non-lawyers applying for rights of audience. Somewhat mysteriously,the sections were never commenced.

At the time, commencement of the sections was deferred indefinitely, amid bitter controversy. Ministers gave an undertaking that the sections would not be implemented until other reforms in the 1990 act – in particular, the introduction of solicitor-advocates – had been given time to bed down. However, the fact that the measures remain on the statute book but are still not active has provided ammunition for critics of the lawyers' "closed shop". It has also attracted the attention of both the Office of Fair Trading and the House of Commons Trade and Industry Select Committee. Holyrood ministers are refusing to comply with an order by Scottish information commissioner Kevin Dunion to publish the documents sought by Alexander, which include letters from the late First Minister Donald Dewar to both Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott and Lord Irvine of Lairg, the former Lord Chancellor.

As The Herald reported earlier this year, the case constitutes the first occasion since freedom of information legislation took effect that the Executive has elected to fight its case before the courts. Industry observers are puzzled why ministers are going out on a limb on the issue, especially since commencement of sections 25-29 is part of the legal profession bill currently at committee stage 3 at Holyrood. Suspicions have inevitably arisen that the documents sought by Alexander could prove embarrassing to members of the New Labour hierarchy and senior Scottish lawyers past and present. Keen, whose recent cases have included acting for Tommy Sheridan in the News of the World libel case, will be supported by junior counsel Kenneth McBrearty.

The information commissioner will be represented by another eminent brief, Paul Cullen QC. The Herald asked the Executive why it continues to block publication of the documents sought by Alexander, when it supports, and indeed is legislating for, commencement of sections 25-29. A spokesman said: "The appeal process has an important part to play, for example in ensuring proper interpretation and application of FOI legislation. For the Executive, the commissioner has issued decisions in around 56 cases – in three of these we have considered that it's appropriate to appeal. This is one of those cases. "Those cases are currently sub judice, however, so it is inappropriate for us to make any further comment at this point."

http://www.theherald.co.uk/business/76926.html Freedom of information, the law and the public purse


Reid ‘buries’ news that police hold DNA of 1m innocent people 18 December 2006


MASONIC POLICE USING ILLEGAL POWERS TO HOLD INFORMATION AGAINST INNOCENT BRITISH CITIZENS.

REID IS A MASONIC CONTROLLER

POLICE are holding the DNA records of more than 1m innocent people — eight times more than ministers have previously admitted. Official figures slipped out by the Home Office last week show that almost one in three of the 3.4m individuals whose details are kept on the database do not have a criminal record or a police caution. The government has now been accused of trying to bury “the bad news” among last week’s police announcements over the murders of five prostitutes in Ipswich.

Earlier this year, the Home Office reported that the figure was just 139,463. But in a parliamentary answer last week, ministers said that of the 3,457,000 individuals on the database, just 2,317,555 had a criminal conviction or caution recorded on the Police National Computer. That means that 1,139,445 people have their personal details stored without having been found guilty of any crime. The new figures were slipped out by John Reid, the home secretary and Joan Ryan, a junior Home Office minister, on Monday as the news agenda was dominated by the hunt for the Ipswich killer. This weekend opposition MPs and civil liberties groups accused Reid of trying to hide the admission that innocent people are being secretly criminalised by “Big Brother” government.

The Tories have called for a parliamentary vote on whether details of people who were innocent or not charged should be included against their wishes. David Davis, the shadow home secretary, said the timing of the Home Office release was unacceptable. “This is a cynical piece of news management, one of the pieces of bad news rushed out last week.” He said the eightfold increase suggested that the much smaller figures released by ministers in March must have been inaccurate. “This is a matter which ought to be debated in parliament.” Tony Blair has said the public supported expansion of the database because it was “helping us to track down murderers (and) rapists”.

But the database’s rapid growth has alarmed experts as well as politicians. Sir Alec Jeffreys, a pioneer of DNA forensic science, has said the expansion is out of control. He has condemned the “mission creep” behind the project, protesting that the database was never intended to include innocent civilians. The Nuffield Council on Bioethics, an independent think tank, has said the country risks being transformed from a nation of citizens into a nation of suspects. Civil liberties groups say the DNA database is just the latest example of the gradual creation of the “surveillance state” by Labour. They warn that innocent people could find themselves under suspicion if their DNA is found at a crime scene through no fault of their own, for example on a stolen mobile phone.

The DNA database was set up in 1995.

Additional reporting: Anna Mikhailova

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-2508308,00.html


Senior police officer was client of murdered Ipswich girls 18 December 2006


COP WANTED IN MURDER PROBE

MURDERED Paula Clennell is pointing the finger at a senior policeman punter from beyond the grave, the News of the World can reveal. The officer — who works for a neighbouring constabulary — was a regular client to her AND one of the Suffolk Strangler's other victims. Paula 24, volunteered the information to detectives shortly before her death when she was quizzed over two fellow hookers.

At the time Gemma Adams was dead and Tania Nichol was missing. An insider told us: "The detectives asked Paula to list her clients. She told them that one of her regulars was a senior police officer with another force who she shared with one of the other girls. "She revealed that she visited him at a house in Suffolk. "Irrespective of what this man does for a living, this is now an active line of inquiry. "He won't be treated any differently because of who he is. This is a murder investigation." Paula was known to regularly pair up with other girls to entertain clients. Last night, Suffolk police refused to deny that they were actively investigating the officer.

A spokesman said: "We are interested in speaking to anyone who may have had contact with any of the victims." And Det Chief Supt Stewart Gull, who is heading the investigation into the murder of the five Ipswich prostutes, told us: "Regardless of whether he's a police officer, I am not going to be drawn on a particular individual. "We are looking at a number of interesting individuals and that's my line." A spokesman for the force where the client is allegedly based said: "If there is a police officer who has had any contact with any of the victims it is their professional responsibilty to come forward and we would ask that they do so at their earliest opportunity."

Paula was filmed by a TV company on December 5 as she continued to walk the streets in the red light district of Ipswich even though the body of Gemma had already been found and Tania was missing. She told ITV Anglia: "I need the money. But I am a bit wary about getting into cars." Our source said: "Paula clearly went with the killer knowing a murderer was on the loose so it is likely she was familiar with the punter." It is possible that the girls — all addicts — were given drugs to render them powerless. Toxicology tests are being carried out on all five bodies.

Meanwhile detectives have released poignant CCTV footage of the last time vice girl Anneli Alderton, 24, was seen alive. The grainy 1 min 59 seconds video was taken on a train at approximately 6pm between Harwich and Colchester on December 3 and there were no sightings of her after that. Seven days later her body was found in woods at Nacton near Ipswich — the third to be discovered. She was three months pregnant. Det Ch Supt Gull said: "We need to piece together Anneli's movements after this. At what stage did Anneli get off the train? And where did she go after that? If anyone saw Anneli after Sunday December 3 we want to hear from them." Almost childlike, Anneli looks excited as her train nears a station. Seemingly alone she uses the dark windows as mirrors and preens and poses as if getting ready for a night out.

She is dressed in blue jeans, a black zipped anorak with fur-lined hood and grey top. She carries a nylon tie-up bag. Unaware of the camera, she delves into the bag and pulls out a tatty Aldi carrier, from which she grabs a can of hairspray and brush.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news1.shtml


Crooked masonic cops cocaine link in murder probe 17 December 2006


A WELSH private detective was murdered because he was about to expose crooked cops involved in a conspiracy to flood Britain with cocaine, police have told Wales on Sunday.

The Scotland Yard revelation means that for the first time in their 19-year inquiry, officers have uncovered a motive for the killing. The butchered body of Daniel Morgan - who was brought up in Llanfrechfa, Gwent, and went to agricultural college in Monmouthshire - was found in the car park of the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham, South London, on March 10, 1987. Embedded in the 37-year-old's skull was a cheap Chinese-made Diamond brand axe. It was wrapped in masking tape so the killer's fingerprints would not be left behind.

Leading the hunt, Detective Chief Superintendent Dave Cook said: "We believe he was killed because he was about to expose a conspiracy to supply drugs, a criminal conspiracy involving a large amount of drugs. "We think it was cocaine. We know that it was potentially a large scale drug distribution network that he was going to expose and he was killed because of that. "We believe there was a link to police corruption. Mr Morgan's death was the obvious way to reduce the risk of it being exposed. "In the past we never really had a motive. Every day brings us new information. We have a number of suspects.

"But I am going to take my time and get this done properly. "The people who have done this know they are responsible because they were there, and they know I know who they are." In October, Mr Morgan's classic 1950s open top Austin Healey sports car was found in a London lock-up. And in August two men were arrested in connection with the case. A third was arrested in September. The men, who have not been charged, were released on police bail. A number of witnesses have come forward with new evidence since a televised appeal on the BBC's Crimewatch programme last month.

The new development has been welcomed by Mr Morgan's family, who have always claimed he was murdered after discovering evidence of police corruption. Mr Morgan's 78-year-old mum Isobel Hulsmann, who lives in Hay-on-Wye, has travelled back and forth to London hundreds of times in her bid to see justice done, despite suffering a heart condition. She said: "I am very keen to get this tied up, I think it's time. I so badly want closure on this. It has been devastating. Sometimes I feel as though it happened yesterday, because there has never been any resolution to it.

"This investigation team is doing its very best. I'm hoping charges are brought and there will be a trial. " Mr Morgan's brother, Alastair, who lives in Islington, North London, added: "All I'm waiting for is for people to be charged, for the police to get sufficient evidence and charge people with his murder. We are optimistic, we have to be." Brecon and Radnorshire MP Roger Williams, who has campaigned with the family, said: "The more public this matter is, the more likely a conviction. "I have real admiration for Daniel Morgan's mother and brother who have not let the case slip even though they have been very badly served in the past by the police.

"I am pleased that Det Chief Supt Dave Cook is now leading the hunt. He is a man of great energy and entirely untouched by the corruption that was endemic in the Metropolitan Police force at the time of the murder. "The exposure of a new motive for the murder involving drug supply and police corruption will bring many new leads. It is quite clear that the criminal fraternity are breaking ranks and bringing new information to the police and I'm sure that we are now better placed to gain a conviction."

http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/tm_headline=crooked-cops--cocaine-link-in-murder-probe%26method=full%26objectid=18277287%26siteid=50082-name_page.html


DEMOCRACY?WHAT DEMOCRACY 17 December 2006


While Bush and Blair rabbit on about the West's democracies what exactly do they think democracy is all about?

Democracy is the ability of the citizens of a country to select from a broad spectrum of political views and from a number of different parties and leaders.Both the UK and USA operate a so called democracy where TWO party leaders are chosen by the illuminati/skull and bones/masons /Bilderbergs and promoted by their multi million dollar/pound media buddies during election campaigns.

Both parties ,Labour and Tory in UK ,Democrats and Republicans in USA,are funded through their network of masonic millionaires to ensure no other parties manage to break the hold they have over their countries elections that has gone on since the beginnings of those so called democracies. Blair and Bush are elected ONLY because of the very limited election process's the long suffering public have had to put up with in the USA and UK for so very long.The wests media playing a major part in conning the public into believing that they have REAL choice.

Our organisations have accumulated an enormous amount of evidence to show neither the USA or UK are in any way democratic .The actual process is dominated by shadow masonic controllers pulling the strings of ALL the outlets used for promoting political parties especially our mass media.The majority of Britain and America's public have had more than enough of the donkeys who get voted back into power time and again only because of the UN-democratic process that allows not a BALANCE to British and American politics but allows the same political agendas to continue unabated no matter which side wins the two horse(donkey) race.

We have a system in the UK and USA where we have a choice between a Goering or a Himmler ,either way we will still have the same fascists in charge being controlled behind the scenes by their high ranking secret society brothers who fund their rise to political power.The unaccountable and unelected Bohemian Grovers/Skull and bones in the USA and the The United Grand Lodge of England/Bilderbergs in the UK are the actual powers running the USA and UK behind the scenes as the shadow governments.


CCTV EVERYWHERE EXCEPT COURTROOMS(updated) 17 December 2006


In a country that spends vast sums on CCTV to monitor its citizens everywhere they go ,isn't it ODD that a government ,that suggests it is trying to protect us, seems to fail us when we enter British courts. From the growing number of people being dragged through the court system it is a place most feel the biggest threat and where thay cannot get audio recordings never mind video, to catch the BIGGEST crooks of all.

Litigious crooks who thieve billions from unrepresented victims of a system who face masonic monsters and tyrants dressed in robes and regalia(that disguise doesn't fool any of the victims of their plundering).

While the UK government pursue the poor on the most meagre of infringements of law ,they IGNORE the biggest rogues and vagabonds running our courts.The obstinate resistance by the judiciary and lawyers to have their crimes filmed and caught on camera shows a two tier system of law .Using CCTV EVERYWHERE except the very place justice is supposed to be seen to be being done BUT NEVER IS. The UK's star chamber secret civil/family court system.


Royalty still using slave labour 17 December 2006


The richest dynasty in the world pay slave labour wages
Royal Family cuts pensions for hard-up Palace staff

Palace staff have been hit by news that their pensions are to be cut

Pensions for Royal servants have been slashed after their retirement fund plunged more than £1 million into the red. The cuts mean that about 250 Palace staff, already some of the lowest-paid workers in the public sector, will either have to work years longer to receive the same payout - or struggle by on a smaller pension. "This is a huge blow for staff who work up to 48 hours a week for very little pay," says one Royal source.

"Whenever servants complain about pay, the employers mention the pension scheme and the free on-site accommodation as compensations. "This has blown a hole in that argument." The Royal Household is one of the few employers still to offer a pension scheme that guarantees an income based on a worker's final salary. It pays 23 per cent of employees' earnings into the fund - more than double the national average so staff do not have to make contributions themselves. But with longer life expectancy and tough stock-market conditions, that is still not enough to fund the existing scheme, leading to the cuts.

About 250 of the 1,200 members of the Royal Household are in the scheme, the remainder having other arrangements. At present, for every year worked, staff receive 1/60th of their final salary but after April 1 that entitlement will grow at only 1/70th of the salary per year. The changes were outlined in a memo, which stated that cutbacks were unavoidable as the current scheme "is not sustainable in the longer term". It gave the example of a £20,000-a-year Palace worker retiring in 2017 after 40 years who would accrue 30 years at the higher rate (1977-2007) and ten years at the lower rate (2007-2017). The effect would be to reduce his pension from the £13,333 a year he might have expected to £12,875 - a drop of about 3.5 per cent. Alternatively, he could work almost two years longer to retire on his original pension. Experts estimate that on average Royal servants will lose seven per cent of their pension following the cuts.

The Queen's finance directors argue that the scheme is one of the most generous in the country but some aides complain that such generosity is irrelevant given the low level of the salaries in the first place. "The Queen Mother's servant "Backstairs Billy" Tallon devoted 51 years of loyal service to the Palace and has found himself, at the age of 69, with an annual pension of only £11,000," said a source.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said that there had been "no gripes" among staff over the letter. "It is an incredibly generous scheme," she said. A spokesman for the Public and Commercial Services Union, which represents Palace staff, said: "A cut in pensions is a cause for concern, particularly when their pay is so low in the first place."

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=423156&in_page_id=1770


Britains chief constables tainted with a masonic stench 17 December 2006


The sanctimonious NEW labour party under Blair patronise the British public continually about new steps to give more powers to the already corrupt and MASONIC run British courts and police to curb criminality.When in fact they are THE most criminal party EVER to have used their public position to line their own pockets alongside Thatchers corrupt period in office.

The tragedy is that while wee boys are being imprisoned for stealing a mars bar from woolies.Both the political and legal crooks running Britain are lining their pockets with monumental amounts of money obtained by deception and fraud and the POLICE do NOTHING.

This due to the MASONIC control the UK is being run under and EVERY one of them is helping line the pockets of the monolithic masonic coffers .Britains chief constables are tainted with the stench of MASONIC CONTROL as are Britains judges and all others in high office attached to law enforcement,M.I.5 and 6 included.
===============
Knives are out for Lord Levy as Blair rift grows

A growing rift between Tony Blair and Lord Levy threatened to scupper the Prime Minister's latest peace mission to the Middle East, just as it started. Mr Blair twice failed to give his personal backing to the peer - who is both Labour's chief fundraiser and No10's Middle East envoy - amid signs the cash-for-honours inquiry had strained their once-close friendship. Mr Blair was grilled at a Press conference in Turkey on whether it was appropriate for Lord Levy to retain a role as Downing Street's go-between in Israel while he was still a police suspect.

He also ducked questions over claims Downing Street had tried to smear Gordon Brown by sucking him into the peerages scandal. The row escalated amid mounting pressure on Lord Levy following the discovery of a notebook belonging to Labour donor Sir Christopher Evans, who has been arrested as part of the investigation. Sir Christopher's notes, which refer to Levy, suggest he was asked if he wanted 'a k (knighthood) or a big p (peerage)'. The note was discovered by police during interviews with other witnesses who were asked if they had had similar conversations with Labour fundraisers.

Sir Christopher, a biotech tycoon who was knighted in 2001 and made a £1million loan to Labour before the 2005 Election, has told friends he has had repeated approaches from Labour figures about a peerage. "I have lost count of the number of times people have said to me 'You are just the kind of guy we would like to see in the House of Lords'," he told one colleague. A spokesman for Sir Christopher said the note had nothing to do with the current investigation as it was a "casual" observation made years ago. Unlike four other businessmen who lent Labour £1 million, Evans was not recommended for a seat in the Lords. When the peerages for the four others were challenged in October 2005, it was disclosed that Sir Christopher's firm, Merlin Bioscience, was involved in a Serious Fraud Office probe.

In the Middle East, Mr Blair refused to be drawn into the row, saying tetchily: "I have got absolutely nothing to say on that issue. "I am concentrating on this visit on the issues I shall be raising in respect of Israel and Palestine." When invited by reporters to give his backing to Lord Levy in his role as Middle East envoy, Mr Blair declined, saying: "I am afraid, no matter how many different ways you might want to draw me into it, I am not getting drawn into it." Later, on the flight from Ankara to Cairo in Egypt, the Prime Minister's official spokesman, while acknowledging the controversial peer retains his envoy job, made it clear No 10 was keeping its distance. He said: "I do not brief on Lord Levy. He can speak for himself."

Mr Blair is due to spend almost a week in the region visiting Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the United Arab Emirates. He hopes to kick-start the peace process, stalled since the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers in the summer. But with Lord Levy looking increasingly "detached" from No 10, insiders have raised serious doubts about what positive effect Mr Blair's visit can have. The rift between Mr Blair and his fundraising former tennis partner has been steadily widening as the police investigation proceeds.

It has been reported that when the Prime Minister was quizzed by police last week, his account differed significantly from the one offered by Levy during his arrest and questioning earlier in the year. Mr Blair's mission was further compromised while he was in the air on his way to Egypt, when Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas suddenly called fresh elections. The move risks pushing popular extremist party Hamas, which won the last ballot, back on a path of terrorism. But in Cairo, Mr Blair was optimistic. He said: "The door is open to Hamas. I never believe in giving up in these situations."

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=423146&in_page_id=1770


Legal Profession & Legal Aid Bill finally passed by Scottish Parliament 16 December 2006


Legal Profession & Legal Aid Bill finally passed by Scottish Parliament, with amendments.

At around 5.31pm on Thursday, 14th December 2006, the LPLA Bill was finally passed by the Scottish Parliament - seven years after myself & several others asked the Scottish Parliament's Justice & Home Affairs Committee of 1999 to consider the issue of corruption within the Scottish legal profession & rampant prejudice in responding to complaints against solicitors & advocates.

The passing of the LPLA Bill, did, however, not go unconditional, as you saw in my article on the day of the debate : Law Society of Scotland lobbies Scottish Parliament to pass anti consumer amendments on LPLA Bill threatening Court action if demands not met ... and many anti consumer amendments, demanded at the point of threat of Court action by the Law Society's Chief Executive Douglas Mill, were passed by what seems to be a roll of MSPs infatuated - or maybe even on the payroll, of the Law Society of Scotland. At least, however, the ‚ £20,000 fine limit - which pro-crooked lawyers msp Bill Aitken demanded be reduced to a paultry £5,000 was left alone. I covered the Law Society of Scotland's threat to take the Parliament to court on the LPLA Bill here : Law Society of Scotland threatens Court challenge against Scottish Executive over LPLA legal reform Bill I think you can describe some of those politicians who passed the Law Society's amendments, as enemies of the people. After all, what I said on Thursday is true - these MSPs helped criminals amend the Law, so they can go on being criminals - albeit they will have to be a little more inventive on how they get round the new Laws. Sick isn't it ? but what can you expect from a desperate bunch of people as lawyers - who have infiltrated our parliamentary democracy & run it for their own private dictatorship - while we have to pay.

Doubt me ? Well, you have already seen how easy the Law Society of Scotland have censored the Scottish Media, in articles I wrote here : Law Society of Scotland actively censors the Scottish Press to kill articles on crooked lawyers & here : Scottish Legal Profession censors the Press to kill off bad publicity - Part II .. so neutering the Scottish Parliament would have been easy. After all, a few of it's members are juts crooks too .. such as this example ;Scottish Parliament withholds documents as Deputy First Minister faces allegations of questionable mortgage arrangements - milking their expenses & giving false information on mortgages so they can get the taxpayer to pay them off and then of course there's this example : Scottish Labor Politician rents his own son's flat for £7000 a year, charging it up to taxpayers .... so it would be easy to nobble that lot then ! ... plenty dirty secrets to hide in exchange for favourable votes .. and please note how Nicol Stephen msp & John Home Robertson msp voted - for the crooked lawyers anti consumer amendments .... makes you think, doesn't it ? You can see who voted for & against the amendments in the Official Report from the Parliament on the LPLA Bill debate at Holyrood.

Only John Swinney & Colin Fox really seem to have taken consumer interests to heart with comments they made in the chamber - comments which will be most unwelcome at Drumsheugh Gardens, where no doubt, Douglas Mill will be ripping what little hair he has left, out in a beetroot red rage. Here is what John Swinney said in comments relating to how an ex Boss of the Law Society, Kenneth Pritchard, intervened in a case to protect crooked lawyers, and thus obstruct the law : Later on in the debate, John Swinney, again, makes comments on a story I covered here : Chief Executive of the Law Society of Scotland branded a liar after FSA denies claims of intervention to block complaints body on how the current Chief Executive of the Law Society of Scotland, Douglas Mill, was caught out lying in the newspapers over the remit of the Financial Services Authority, in a campaign of legal profession sponsored disinformation against the public :

What now for the LPLA Bill ?

Well, it will, or should go into law .. unless some unforeseen happens ... but for those of us who have campaigned for so many years (since 1994, myself ... others just as long) ... this is only the beginning of a new battle ... to ensure the new Scottish Legal Complaints Commission actually does it's job and the public do get justice and proper compensation when they find their crooked lawyer has messed up their legal affairs - or worse, embezzled all their money .. something typical of the Scottish legal profession - go to a lawyer, and expect to be robbed - that should be pasted onto each lawyer as Government Health Warning - just like a packet of cigarettes. If I can be a little more cinematic on it, let me quote Winston Churchill's Mansion House speech to the Lord Mayor's Luncheon on 10 November 1942 ... "This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." and that is where we now stand on the issue of crooked lawyers in Scotland - more to come, folks ... Read on for the reports of the LPLA Bill passing the Scottish Parliament, from the Scotsman & Herald newspapers, links to follow with the articles.

http://petercherbi.blogspot.com/2006/12/legal-profession-legal-aid-bill.html
===============
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=1861122006

Complaints against lawyers procedure amended

MINISTERS bowed to warnings from the legal profession yesterday and changed the proposed new complaints procedure for lawyers, introducing a right of appeal for the first time. The Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act was passed by Holyrood yesterday, creating an independent commission to deal with consumer complaints against lawyers. But lawyers had warned of legal action and a possible breach of European human rights law if ministers went ahead with their original plans, which would have refused a right of appeal to lawyers against decisions of the commission. During the final day's debate in parliament Johann Lamont, the deputy justice minister, said ministers accepted the need for a right of appeal and this was added to the bill before it was passed. Labour MSP Jackie Baillie lodged the amendments to allow a limited right of appeal. "They [the amendments] would preserve the essence of the current policy, not undermine them," Ms Lamont said.

The changes to the bill will mean that lawyers must seek leave to appeal to the Court of Session before they are able to challenge a commission decision. The grounds of all appeal are limited to error in law, procedural impropriety, that the commission has "acted irrationally" or where its findings are not supported by the facts. The Executive accepted moves to distance ministers from the appointments process for the new body, handing over responsibility for this to the Lord President.
===================
http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/76788.html

Lawyers win right to appeal consumer watchdog decisions

Lawyers were yesterday given a limited right of appeal against a new independent commission to deal with consumer complaints. The profession, which remains deeply uneasy about the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill, had claimed that without any form of appeal the new procedure would fall foul of the European Convention on Human Right and the legislation could become the first at Holyrood to be struck down as incompetent. The Scottish Legal Complaints Commission will have the power to bring the Society of Advocates or Law Society of Scotland before the Court of Session on contempt charges if either of the professional bodies fails to implement its recommendations.

The bill also provides for compensation payments of up to £20,000 to clients found to have received poor service. An attempt by a Labour back bencher to have this reduced to £15,000 failed in a vote. The current £5000 level was raised from £1500 only in the past 18 months. A spokesman for the Faculty of Advocates said: "The faculty will require to consider in further detail whether or not these and other amendments do address the concerns which have been raised about compliance with the convention."

Douglas Mill, chief executive of the Law Society of Scotland, said: "The parliament has taken steps today to try to ensure the legislation is both legal and fair. "A number of other positive amendments were also brought forward, which, it is hoped, will improve the legislation to ensure that it can work in practice, something the society has promoted from the start of this process."


Trotsky as a Freemason 15 December 2006


Under the Sign of the Scorpion - the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire By Jüri Lina

Lenin and Trotsky, 1917

Excerpt from Under The Sign of the Scorpion by Jüri Lina

Mr. Leiba Bronstein became a freemason in 1897 and later a high-ranking Illuminatus through his friend Alexander Parvus. He also maintained contacts with B'nai B'rith, a Jewish Masonic order, which had previously aided Jewish "revolutionaries" in Russia. Jacob Schiff, chairman of the banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and a minion of the Rothschilds, took care of the contacts between the "revolutionary movement in Russia" and B'nai B'rith. (Gerald B. Winrod, "Adam Weishaupt - A Human Devil", p. 47.)

Leiba Bronstein began to study freemasonry and the history of the secret societies seriously in 1898, and continued these studies during the two years he spent in prison in Odessa. He took notes amounting to over 1000 pages. "Internationaler Freimaurer-Lexikon" (Vienna/Munich, 1932, p. 204) reluctantly admits that Leiba Bronstein-Trotsky came to Bolshevism through this study of freemasonry. As a People's Commissary for Military Affairs, Trotsky introduced the pentagram - the five-pointed star - as the symbol of the Red Army. The Cabbalists had taken over this symbol of black magic from the witches in ancient Chaldea. With the aid of Alexander Parvus, Trotsky reached the conclusion that the true purpose of freemasonry was to eliminate the nation states and their cultures and to introduce a Judaised world state.

This is also stated in "The Secret Initiation into the 33rd Degree": "Freemasonry is nothing more and nothing less than revolution in action, continuous conspiracy." Bronstein became a convinced internationalist who, through Parvus, learned that the Jewish people were their own collective Messiah and would reach domination over all peoples through the mixing of the other races and elimination of national boundaries. An international republic was to be created, where the Jews would be the ruling element, since no others would be able to understand and control the masses. Leiba Bronstein became a member of the French Masonic lodge Art et Travail, to which Lenin also belonged, but in addition joined B'nai B'rith, according to the political scientist Karl Steinhauser ("EG - Die Super-UdSSR von morgen" / "EU - the Super Soviet Union of Tomorrow", Vienna, 1992, p. 162).

Leon Trotsky became a member of the Jewish Masonic order B'nai B'rith in New York, in January 1917. (Yuri Begunov, Secret Forces in the History of Russia, St. Petersburg, 1995, pp. 138-139.) He was already a member of the Misraim-Memphis freemasonry. Winston Churchill confirmed in 1920 that Trotsky was also an Illuminatus. (Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8 February 1920.) Trotsky eventually reached a very high position within freemasonry, since he belonged to the Shriner Lodge, which only freemasons of the 32nd degree and higher were allowed to join. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Alexander Kerensky, Béla Kun, and other leading politicians have also been among these select few. (Professor Johan von Leers, The Power behind the President, Stockholm, 1941, p. 148.)

(Under the Sign of the Scorpion, Stockholm, 2002.)

This 447 page book presents shocking new facts about the bloody upheavals in Russia in 1917. The Author reveals the presence of dark Masonic forces behind the scenes (both Lenin and Trotsky were high-ranking freemasons and Illuminati, obeying the International Masonic Council). The Author pursues the history of the communist ideology from the Illuminati of the 18th century, to Moses Hess and his disciples Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Illuminati movement was founded on the 1st of May 1776 in Ingolstadt, Bavaria. The book describes the role of the Illuminati in the French "Revolution." It then goes on to examine the so-called Russian Revolutions in 1917. Jüri Lina shows how the events in Russia between 1917 and 1991 still affect the fate of the world.

The author tries to answer questions like:

*Where did the Communist idea originate and how was it
developed?
*Why did powerful international financial circles
finance the "Russian revolutionaries" in March and
November 1917?
*What was the purpose of the social destruction that
followed and in which way did this serve the forces
behind the Communists?

"Under the Sign of the Scorpion" will change the reader's perception of reality. After the fall of the Soviet power on 24 August 1991, the official archives have begun to reveal their secrets to amazed Russian historians. There is a constant flow of new shocking information, but only a trickle has as yet reached us in Western Europe and America. Above all, we lack an overall picture. It is this picture that Jüri Lina attempts to give us in his book, which is largely based on released Russian material.

The author also explains why the Soviet Union was abolished and is currently being recreated under another name - the European Union. The book is illustrated.

International customers may order the book by paying $30 (USA), £20 (UK), 25 euros into Jüri Lina's bank account in the following way: Swift: HANDSESS 6916 account 374 462 682, Jüri Lina

You may also mail cash directly to:
Jüri Lina,
Friggs väg 6 IV,
145 69 Norsborg (Stockholm),
Sweden

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/08aug/sovietrisefall.html


Diana's and Dodi's masonic murder and cover up 14 December 2006




David Shayler on Princess Diana's death(video)

Stevens is an establishment mason unfit to decide on the outcome of an inquiry into Diana and Dodi's death

The statue of liberty is a masonic symbol paid for with masonic money and the masonic symbol above the tunnel Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed where murdered is identical to the flame atop the statue of liberty.Diana's and Dodi's is a masonic murder alongside JFK's in Dallas.

http://www.davidphenry.com/press/Press011.htm

Flamme fatale: On place de l’Alma an oversized metallic flame holds vigil over the tunnel where Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed perished in a highspeed encounter with a concrete pillar on 31 August 1997. The statue has nothing to do with the people’s princess; it was, like her, in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Erected by the Paris-based International Herald Tribune to celebrate its centennial in 1987, this replica of the flame from the Statue of Liberty’s torch was financed by well-meaning US–American friendship. With that in short supply, the edifice has always suffered from something of an identity crisis. Along came Di’s tragic rendezvous, and its tidal wave of flowers, candles, tokens and graffiti that damaged the statue’s gilded surface.

In 2001 the Mairie restored the finish and cordoned off the pedestal. Council roadsweepers were initially overwhelmed, and leave the cleanup to two elderly volunteers who come daily to clear the bouquets. A lack of romantic frisson accounts for the continued popularity of Lady Di’s unofficial monument, which flickers obstinately away as if proud of its new calling as an iconic candle in the wind.

================
FULL REPORT HERE

Diana death a 'tragic accident'

Lord Stevens said he hoped the report would bring some closure

An official UK police inquiry into the Paris car crash which killed Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed has found no evidence the couple were murdered. Lord Stevens, who led the three-year investigation, said the 1997 crash was a "tragic accident". The inquiry report said chauffeur Henri Paul, who also died, was speeding and over the legal drink-drive limit.

A spokesman for Mr Al Fayed's father said he does not accept the findings as questions remain "unanswered". Michael Cole said it was "highly unsatisfactory" that up to 18 key witnesses to the crash were not interviewed by the Metropolitan Police's inquiry into the death. He called for next year's inquests to be heard before a jury so that the evidence presented by Lord Stevens could be "thoroughly tested". The princess, 36, and Mr Al Fayed, 42, died when their Mercedes crashed in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in August 1997.

"There was no conspiracy to murder any of the occupants of that car," Lord Stevens said. The findings - contained within an 832 page document - form part of the inquest into the deaths of the couple.

Mr Al Fayed's father, Mohamed, said the £3.69m spent on the Stevens inquiry was a total waste. "I feel sorry for the taxpayers and the money that has been wasted on such garbage," he said. "Whatever it's going to cost me, if it costs me the last penny in my purse, I'm not going to rest until I get the gangsters." Mr Al Fayed said he would "definitely" accept a verdict by an inquest jury if it heard all the evidence. Lord Stevens told a news conference in London the report addresses the key issues emerging from a "most complex and challenging" investigation.

"I have no doubt that speculation as to what happened that night will continue and that there are some matters, as in many other investigations, about which we may never find a definitive answer." The evidence suggests Princess Diana was not engaged or about to get engaged and scientific tests showed she was not pregnant, he said. "We have spoken to many of her family and closest friends and none of them have indicated to us that she was either about to or wished to get engaged," he said.

"Prince William has confirmed to me that his mother had not given him the slightest indication about such plans for the future." Some 400 people, including Prince Charles, the Duke of Edinburgh and the heads of MI5 and MI6, were interviewed or contacted by the inquiry. Referring to claims by Mohamed Al Fayed, the report said there was no evidence of a connection between the Duke of Edinburgh and MI6.

Mr Stevens said the various legal cases currently being pursued by Mr Al Fayed through the French courts are "unlikely, in my opinion, to have any bearing on my conclusion that there was no conspiracy or cover up". He was satisfied US intelligence services had made no attempt to hold back information that could have altered the inquiry's conclusions. "I very much hope that all the work we have done and the publication of this report will help to bring some closure to all who continue to mourn the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul," said Lord Stevens. Clarence House said later that Princes William and Harry hope the "conclusive findings" of the report will end speculation surrounding their mother's death.

Paparazzi pursuit

Harrods department store owner Mohamed Al Fayed does want closure, spokesman Mr Cole told a news conference. "He wants to think back on the summer of 1997 as a happy time, with his family and Diana's family together and everybody so content in their own company. "But he does feel that he has a solemn duty as a parent to reveal the facts as he believes them to be."

The crash took place as the couple were pursued by paparazzi photographers during the drive from the Ritz hotel to Mr Al Fayed's flat. A French investigation into the crash concluded Mr Paul had lost control of the car because he was driving too fast while under the influence of alcohol and prescription drugs. Meanwhile, lawyers for bodyguard Trevor Rees, the sole survivor of the crash, said he will not be making any comment on the report or the inquest.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk/6179275.stm


Under the Sign of the Scorpion 14 December 2006


”If you shut up the truth and bury it beneath the earth, it will only grow and gather itself to such an explosive power that it will destroy everything in its path the day it breaks free.” Emile Zola

INTRODUCTORY EXPLANATIONS

When the book ”Under the Sign of the Scorpion” was published, I did not expect it to be a great success, because I knew that most people, due to the enormous influence of the freemasons over the schools, the mass media and other key institutions, had lost their ability to think independently. It became clear, however, that there were some who had managed to stay clear of the influence of all these lies and understood that something was wrong in contemporary society. These people found answers to their questions in ”Under the Sign of the Scorpion”. They had already surmised that a malicious power was behind the process of destruction, which affects us all, but they needed more facts.

People in different countries have read ”Under the Sign of the Scorpion” and have become curious about the background of inter-national freemasonry. But they knew too little about the frightening history and essence of this secret society. This showed the need for a comprehensive book about the dark history, ideology and activities of freemasonry, which would act as a complement to ”Under the Sign of the Scorpion”. Thus there was a demand, which led to that this new book about freemasonry was written.

During many years, I have gathered large amounts of important facts, documents and rare source material, which have never been published in ordinary (that is, officially sanctioned) history books. With the help of these facts, a completely different picture of major world events emerges. Without details about the true history of freemasonry, it is very difficult to orientate oneself in today’s world. For this reason, I chose to collect all the ”forgotten” and concealed information and thereby re-create the true history that our masonic leaders have stolen from us. Our civilization has failed in many crucial areas. These failures have been aggravated by the fact that those who have understood the reason for our troubles refuse to speak out. Others have failed to realize the obvious – that hidden economic forces have acted behind the carefully painted scenes and, virtually unopposed, manipulated us towards our present desperate situation. We have been frightened and weakened, and for this reason the enemies of humanity have succeeded with their treacherous conspiracy. The hidden forces were unable to act freely without first removing important facts from our history.

By referring to this concealed information, it has been possible to clearly identify the masonic forces, which have done everything in their power to transform our world into Hell on Earth. We have been damaged mentally, physically and genetically. We have begun to prefer darkness to light. Most of us have chosen to believe in the illusory myths of the freemasons and assisted in the fight against those who have attempted to reveal the true facts. Far too many of us choose to defend these dark forces. The evil forces are close to victory. Those who defend these forces must also share the responsibility for their crimes against humanity. Many of us have become victims of the freemasons and our personal greed. This book attempts to give an overall picture of the circumstances that have led to the distressing setbacks, which have afflicted us, especially during the last 300 years. In order to orientate ourselves, we must finally dare to call those events and these persons by their real names, despite the fact that those responsible have become stronger than ever and officially deny their involvement in all these serious and unforgivable crimes against humanity.

The freemasons’ internal sources, however, do not deny these crimes. I will present such concealed facts to make it possible to draw some amazing conclusions and to reveal to every seeker of truth who our tormentors really are. Not being aware of these facts is in itself an evil, because ignorance serves evil. It is for this reason that our rulers want us to believe that a lack of historical knowledge and ignorance about the secrets of nature constitutes true knowledge. Those who do not examine the different aspects of the conspiracy will remain incapable of understanding the world. To them every-thing appears dim and mysterious. Even the ancient Romans said: ”Magna est veritas et praevalebit.” (”The truth is great and it will triumph.”) The freemasons have always been enamoured with large social structures and superstates. They have called the violent social upheavals, which were actually brought about by their grand lodges under the leadership of masonic grand masters, ”great popular revo-lutions”.

The Swiss psychologist Carl G. Jung stated: ”The larger the organizations, the more inevitable are their immorality and blind stupidity.” (Carl G. Jung, “Die Beziehungen zwischen dem Ich und dem Unbewussten”, Darmstadt, 1928) We also have clues about what will happen within the European Union – the freemasons’ latest creation. Jung stated in the same book: ”The larger a society or confederacy, the greater the amalgamation of collective factors – which is typical of every large organization – will rest upon conservative prejudices to the detriment of the individual, the more aggravated the moral and spiritual degeneration of the individual.” Apparently different ideologies have been forced upon us. In actual fact, we have all the time been dealing with different aspects of one and the same ideology – illuminism, propagated by international freemasonry. Only insecure individuals and weak ideologies and religions need to resort to violence in order to assert themselves – Judaism, Islam, communism, national socialism, and others. The hylozoists, who follow the teachings of Pythagoras, have never resorted to violence, nor have the Buddhists. This fact alone shows the value of their philosophical teachings, which can help those souls who seek the truth. For this reason, the freemasons despise the teachings that represent goodness and spiritual development. The socialists (the freemasons’ most effective servants) are parti-cularly prone to using violence in their attempts to murder the soul. They consider it more effective and beneficial to murder the soul rather than the body. The communists got nowhere by destroying people’s bodies. Under the symbol of the Illuminati and freemasonry – the red rose – the socialists are after our souls. The French author Romain Rolland stated: ”The murderers of the soul are the worst.” The socialists are well aware that their falsification of history leads to a society without history. The Russian-Jewish socialist Alexander Herzen stated in the 1850s: ”There is nothing more repugnant than a falsification of history on the orders of those in power.” Marx put his finger on the most important method of the Illuminati: “If you can cut people off from their history, they can be easily persuaded.”

While we may ascertain that our leaders conceal facts with the assistance of corrupt ”historians”, we must realize that this falsification of history is part of the conspiracy, since those who control our history also control our future, according to the British author George Orwell. And those who control our present also control our past. All these “isms” are just useful tools for the dark masonic forces that often use various shady ideologies to fill the gaps in their attempted construction of ”a better world for us all”. This is why the freemasons wish to destroy everything connected with ”the old”, that is traditions and common sense. I have visited many powerful lodges all over the world in order to become acquainted with the freemasons’ own material and works. Original sources are the most reliable. It is my opinion that the freemasons, with their unnatural organization, stand on the brink of a vast catastrophe. This book shows how and above all why.

Jüri Lina Stockholm, October 2004

http://www.geocities.com/jyrilina/english/deception.html


There is a serious danger to life act now to save your family 14 December 2006


When first reading this alarming headline the first thoughts weren't in relation to the recent weather and the threat of flooding to parts of Britain.They where more to do with the dangers to families living in the MASONIC run UK.

Every part of our lives is dominated by the shadow government masonic controllers. Whether it is law,politics or law enforcement ,behind the scenes of every part of the United(thats a laugh)Kingdom is a sinister network of dimwitted directors and managers who didn't get positions of authority through their hard work and intellect but through their connections to devil worship.

If there is ONE reason why BRITAIN is in a god awful mess ,it is the failures and incompetence of those charged with running the UK who under any other circumstances would be at the bottom of the salary scale rather than the top. The bulk of Britains high fliers are there for the WRONG reasons.The surveillance society they have created (M.I.5&6) are there primarily to keep the richest dynasty in the world in permanent undemocratic control of the myriad of agencies controlling the citizens(slaves or subjects) of the UK's masonic structure. Politicians,judges,lawyers,bankers and police etc. bow to the demands of the shadow MASONIC CONTROLLERS at the complete expense of all other UK citizens.
==================
‘There is a serious danger to life … act now to save your family’

The warning was short and ominous. "There is a serious danger to life and property. Act now to protect yourself, your family and your home or business." It was sounded yesterday by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) as the country was hit by severe flooding after days of torrential rain. In 24 hours of mounting drama, firefighters rescued a woman and her baby from a car stuck in floodwater. In another incident two people were rescued after being trapped in a car on the B8074 between Dalmally and Bridge of Orchy as water reached the windscreen.

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/76720.html


Law society sabotaging new legal complaints body 14 December 2006


Law Society of Scotland lobbies Scottish Parliament to pass anti consumer amendments on LPLA Bill threatening Court action if demands not met

Just imagine you were a politician for a minute, and someone you knew committed a murder or another serious crime, but got away with it. This criminal, then came to you, asking you to amend the Law so they could murder someone else and get away with it, and just to keep themselves happy, they want you to also write amendments to the Law so they could abuse, murder & steal to their hearts content - and get away with it.

Would you do it ? Would you help a murderer or a fraudster or a child abuser, amend the law so they could carry on murdering, stealing, or abusing and get away with it ?

That is precisely what the Scottish legal profession is asking MSPs to do today in the Scottish Parliament in the debate on the Legal Profession & Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill , which aims to bring independent regulation to the legal profession, and take away the current crooked self regulation system operated by the Law Society of Scotland - which has seen thousands of complaints fiddled against crooked lawyers so clients get little or no compensation while the crooked lawyer gets off the hook from many client complaints & keeps on practising & keeps on robbing other clients who cant get anywhere trying to recover their lost money

Such cases as TOP LAWYER AT THE CENTRE OF 12 NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS are all too common, and from my own experience, just look how crooked lawyer Drew Penman was - and got away with it, to carry on being a crooked lawyer, so much I nominated him for Scotland's Most Famous Crooked Lawyer in Tueday's article Scottish Legal Awards - Lawyer Lawyer on the wall, who is the most crooked of us all ?

The Law Society of Scotland are today, promoting Jim Wallace MSP, former Deputy First Minister and Justice Minister, and Jackie Baillie, former Social Justice Minister and current member of the Justice 2 Committee as allies in their battle to prevent the public from getting a fair hearing when it comes to complaints against crooked lawyers.

Bit strange, isn't it ? that a Former Justice Minister would support a gang of criminals ? would support a profession which has ruined peoples lives, embezzled all their money, even caused the death of people - to save a lawyer from prosecution over fraud, corruption, embezzlement, rape, abuse, drugs dealing .... what kind of politician would support such a group of people ?

It's not just Jim Wallace though - as you can see from the amendments listed for the Parliamentary Debate - there are several other MSPs who have come forth to support Scotland's twisted & corrupt legal profession - hellbent on killing any chance of independent scrutiny of their corrupt behaviour towards clients.

Link to the Amendments: Marshalled List of Amendments selected for Stage 3

Please note Bill Aitken - Conservative MSP for Glasgow - he seems to be one of the Chief mouthpieces for crooked lawyers in this war against consumer reforms it seems - and he is so in love with the idea that crooked lawyers should be allowed to embezzle your money & get away with it - he demanded the proposed maximum fine of £20,000 for crooked lawyers be reduced to a mere £5000 in his Amendment No.179.

How do you like that idea then ? An MSP - a politician you elected, but now a mouthpiece for the Law Society of Scotland, wants a crooked lawyer to only have to pay £5000 at the very most - if for instance - they ruin your business, ruin your life, take your home, embezzle all your money. What kind of punishment or deterrent is that ?

Jackie Ballie MSP - former Social Justice Minister & Justice 2 Committee member isn't far behind Bill Aitken with anti-consumer amendments either - she also proposed the lowering of the £20,000 for crooked lawyers be reduced to £15,000 ... what a rip off ! - and why should there even be a limit of fine ?

How about when a lawyer ruins your business and you lose £100,000 or more ? You won't get much back from the £5,000 or £15,000 fine limit these MSPs are proposing ... and it's no use saying get a lawyer to sue the lawyer - that doesn't work as we all know - and which is why we are here today with the LPLA Bill.

In fact, it seems, out of 129 MSPs at the Scottish Parliament, only a few have stepped forward with any motivation at all on the part of the public - John Swinney MSP (SNP) and Colin Fox (SSP), to mention the most daring. Everyone else has kept a brutal silence on this issue - despite the fact every single MSP knows full well the corruption in the Scottish legal profession and how endemically corrupt the Law Society of Scotland's self regulatory complaints regime has been for decades.

Other MSPs who posted a variety of amendments to the LPLA Bill are : Jeremy Purvis (LibDem) , David Davidson (Conservative), Johann Lamont (Labour), Stewart Maxwell (SNP) & Hugh Henry (Labour)

The Law Society of Scotland has done its utmost to kill off the LPLA Bill, even having groups of lawyers meet with MSPs - even members of the Justice Committees themselves, where lawyers have privately warned some MSPs the LPLA Bill is not to become law unless it writes the amendments itself - and with the amendments proposed by Glasgow's Bill Aitken MSP - it looks like the Law Society of Scotland have done just that.

It's almost as if the Law Society of Scotland wants to censor the Scottish Parliament - just as it has done with the Scottish media - which I wrote about here : Law Society of Scotland actively censors the Scottish Press to kill articles on crooked lawyers and here : Scottish Legal Profession censors the Press to kill off bad publicity - Part II

The Law Society of Scotland is running so scared of the LPLA Bill, the legal profession have now threatened to boycott legal work - all because of the fact that lawyers won't be able to fiddle complaints against themselves with the advent of independent regulation of complaints in the LPLA Bill .. and an article today in the Herald Newspaper quotes those threats - so the crooked lawyers aren't going to take on all those cases such as executry, conveyancing or court work, for which the law requires they are registered as practicing solicitors.

Good ... that means they wont be able to rip you off for vast fees for selling your house or buying a house, or ripping off dead clients wills - like crooked lawyer Andrew Penman did with my dad's will, and they can't prolong Civil Court work you asked them to do for you - so they can fatten up the account at the end of the work done ... It might just bring a new more honest breed of person into the legal arena who is able to undertake the work for you without all those fat inflated bills to feather the high living lifestyles of all those crooked lawyers.

Not content with threatening to boycott legal work, the Law Society of Scotland has also issued a Press Release with a threat of a Court Challenge to the Parliament against the LPLA Bill if the legal profession's demands of amendments are not met. How's that for dictatorship then ! .... has Douglas Mill now become the new Saddam Hussein ? We get rid of one Dictator and another one springs up - but this time, it's at home - and Mr Mill & the gang of political control-freak lawyers in the Scottish legal profession are far more dangerous to the public & the judicial system than any politician - as has been proved time & again.

Douglas Mill's threat of a Court challenge to the LPLA Bill is well known, because he called the newspapers to publish his threat in early November- I covered it here : Law Society of Scotland threatens Court challenge against Scottish Executive over LPLA legal reform Bill,. but it just goes to show how far the Law Society is willing to go to keep complaints handling to themselves - all this to keep crooked lawyers in jobs - who would otherwise be in jail if they tried their wholesale client rip offs, embezzlements & other activities anywhere else.

Peter Cherbi's message to the Scottish Parliament today : Resist the threats & intimidation of the Law Society of Scotland & the legal mafia. Pass the Legal Profession & Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill without all those so obviously anti consumer amendments and give the public a chance to be heard for once. You all know we are right in what we say - and how long all of us victims - the seen & unseen have suffered - do something about it, and bring honesty to the Scottish legal profession. Give the public a reason to trust the people who must represent us in the Courts & legal system - because at the moment, we have no one to trust with our legal affairs. No one.

http://petercherbi.blogspot.com/2006/12/law-society-of-scotland-lobbies.html
=============
Law change ‘may harm clients of solicitors’

Solicitors may walk away from mainstream legal work if there is too much regulatory burden placed on them by legislation which is entering its final stage at Holyrood, the Law Society of Scotland has warned.

A spokeswoman said yesterday that if the costs of remaining as a solicitor are increased by the charges for sustaining a new complaints system, including fines of up to £20,000, that may encourage solicitors to redefine themselves as lawyers or legal advisers instead.

If they do not carry out executry, conveyancing or court work, for which the law requires they are registered as practising solicitors, they would be free to carry on without that badge – on commercial work, for instance. The spokeswoman said solicitors would prefer to remain as a unified profession, but added that costs and regulation could change that. The outcome would only harm customers' interests, it was claimed, taking many lawyers outside the remit of the new complaints system. It may also make lawyers more selective in the cases they are willing to take on.

The Law Society of Scotland has made repeated warnings about the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill, on which MSPs will take their final decisions today. With key amendments facing them, one of those warnings is that the bill as it stands this morning could become the first piece of Holyrood legislation to be struck down for being incompatible with human rights legislation.

Press Release (or declaration of War against the Scottish public & Parliament) by the Law Society of Scotland here :

Former Ministers Back Society's Calls for Change to Legal Reform Bill TWO influential MSPs have backed the Law Society of Scotland's concerns and will bring forward vital amendments to the legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill tomorrow (Thursday 14 December).

Jim Wallace MSP, former Deputy First Minister and Justice Minister, and Jackie Baillie, former Social Justice Minister and current member of the Justice 2 Committee, are among those who have put forward amendments to the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill.

The Society has warned consistently that the Bill, which includes setting up a Scottish Legal Complaints Commission to handle service complaints against lawyers, could breach the European Convention on Human Rights. Unless its flaws are addressed it could become the first Act of the Scottish Parliament to be struck down as incompetent.

The former ministers' amendments, as well as a series of amendments by the Scottish Executive and David Davidson MSP, seek to correct flaws highlighted by the Society. They include the need to provide a right of appeal to the courts against SLCC decisions and involvement of the Lord President in the appointment of Commission members.

Douglas Mill, the Chief Executive of the Society, stressed that the Stage 3 debate tomorrow (Thursday December 14) was the final chance for MSPs to ensure that the new process for making complaints against solicitors is better than the current system.

He said: "The Society backs the principle of establishing an independent body to handle service complaints against solicitors in Scotland but that must be an improvement on the existing system for the public and legal profession alike.

"We have made our concerns known on a number of occasions and a large number of amendments have already been tabled during the parliamentary process which have led to some improvements but the question of ECHR compliance and the independence of the SLCC from government are fundamental and must be addressed tomorrow.

"The Society hopes the amendments brought forward at the Stage 3 debate will correct the flaws in this Bill and ensure it does not face a court challenge at a later stage."

Other changes that the Society hopes will be agreed during the debate include lowering the maximum compensation levels for individual findings of poor service by lawyers from £20,000 and ensuring greater accountability of the work and costs of the SLCC.

http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/76711.html


BBC quoting SHAM government funded fathers group 13 December 2006




Fathers Direct at http://www.fathersdirect.com
are a sham group set up by the establishment ,lawyers and social workers and DO NOT REPRESENT MEN in any shape or form.They are run by hand picked government lackies and masons

The staff

• David Bartlett, Training & Consultancy
• Tom Beardshaw, Networks
• Adrienne Burgess, Policy & Research
• Duncan Fisher, Director
• Kathy Jones, Training and Project
• Jack O’Sullivan, Communications
• Liz Rand, Marketing Services and Publications

The Trustees

• Dame Julie Mellor, Chair of Trustees, former Chair of the Equal Opportunities Commissioner, now a Partner at PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
• Bronwen Cohen OBE, Chief Executive of Children in Scotland.
• Melvyn Davis, Head of Coram boys2MEN Services
• Lisa Harker, Chair of Trustees of the Daycare Trust
• Professor Michael Lamb, Dept of Social & Developmental Psychology, Cambridge University, world’s leading expert on the role of fathers in child development.
• Ben Rose, lawyer and Trustee of youth charities.
• Carolyn Unsted, Principal School Improvement Officer, Lewisham Council.

Funders

They include Department for Education and Skills – Parenting Fund, Strengthening Families, Teenage Pregnancy Unit, Offender Learning and Skills Unit; Department of Health – Section 64; BT; Lloyds TSB; Children in Wales; Children in Scotland; Tudor Trust; Barrow Cadbury Trust; Big Lottery; Venturesome; Baring Foundation.

Quote "Fathers Direct is a key advisor to Government"

THE MEN HATING and LYING BBC are using quotes from this sham group to suggest they speak on behalf of men.This is another devious ploy by the BBC and the establishment ,who control family law, to suggest these latest actions on child support against men are acceptable.

HOW MUCH MORE SINISTER CAN THE EVIL MASONIC/FEMINIST RUN BBC GET ?
=============
Tough new powers on child support

A new body to enforce child maintenance will be able to dock wages and withdraw the passports of absent parents. The power to impose curfews and confiscate driving licences will also be given to the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. CMEC is replacing the failed Child Support Agency from 2008 but Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton said its £3.5bn of debt will not be written off.

The White Paper sets out the naming of shaming of some parents. Those who have had successful court action taken against them will be displayed on a website. Many couples will also be encouraged to make their own financial arrangements for their children. Among the other controversial measures in the proposals is a plan to make it compulsory to have the father's name recorded on the birth certificate to help future enforcement.

The truth of the matter is, whatever reforms we have put into the Child Support Agency, they have not worked Tony Blair Mr Hutton said: "The commission will be given extra powers to recover maintenance from those who repeatedly fail to pay. "This will include the imposition of new curfews and the surrendering of passports, piloting mandatory withholding of wages as the first means of collecting maintenance and exploring the financial services sector new powers to collect maintenance from accounts held by financial institutions. "We will remove the requirement to apply to the courts for a liability order before taking enforcement action and we will take powers to recover debt from deceased estates. "In future I expect CMEC will charge the non resident parent for its services and that we will publicise the names of non resident parents who are successfully prosecuted or have a successful application made against them in court". Mr Hutton conceded that some debt - a sum not expected to exceed £50m - was "completely irrecoverable".

Huge backlog

It was announced in July that the CSA would be scrapped. The agency oversees child maintenance payments between estranged parents. Set up in 1993, the CSA has struggled to keep up with a huge backlog of payments and has been unable to force reluctant parents to pay up. Prime Minister Tony Blair has said the new scheme will mean women on benefit will no longer have to go through the CSA for maintenance payments from absent fathers.

CMEC POWERS
Seize driving licences
Order curfews
Access money directly
Encourage parents to make own arrangements

"The truth of the matter is, whatever reforms we have put into the Child Support Agency, they have not worked," he said. "It is extremely difficult when the agency is being asked to chase relatively small sums of money from people who don't want to pay in circumstances where the mother often doesn't want that to happen either." The Conservatives said it would be 2010 before a new system was in place, leaving 1.4 million families to deal with the CSA and its problems for more than three years.

Tory spokesman Philip Hammond said: "The government can talk all it wants about enforcement, but unless it fixes the root cause of the problem, assessing an absent parent's income effectively, then it is simply building a house on sand." The Liberal Democrat spokesman on work and pensions, David Laws, said the party would have liked the government to bring in the "fundamental reform" of incorporating the Child Support Agency with Revenue and Customs. Campaigning group Fathers Direct, meanwhile, welcomed the plans.

"We particularly welcome the possibility of a new national telephone helpline for separating families," said Chief executive Duncan Fisher said. "We support the increased focus on enforcement of child support, so that the goalposts are clear for parents from the start."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk/6174671.stm


NAMING AND SHAMING BLAIRS MASONIC MEN HATERS 11 December 2006


Our organisations will be naming and shaming on our websites the MASONS behind these plans attacking men to steal their homes,children and assets.

John Hutton one of Blairs Masonic controllers again using family law to destroy men .The CSA was the cause of many mens deaths through suicide.
================
Absent parents face website shame

Absent parents who fail to meet financial obligations to children could be named and shamed, or even tagged and made subject to curfews. The government has signalled that it wants to get tougher on those who refuse to pay – parents who have built up debts of £3.5bn, more than half of which is deemed "uncollectable".

The moves were suggested ahead of legislation which will seek to close the 13-year-old Child Support Agency (CSA) after a catalogue of failures, and create a system for holding absent parents to account. John Hutton, the Work and Pensions Secretary, yesterday said he was looking at "naming and shaming" those who do not pay by placing their details on a website. He explained he wants to "come down like a ton of bricks" on non-payers.

The list of options on the table include the idea of forcing parents to wear electronic tags and to face curfews until their debts are paid. Passports could also be confiscated. The minister explained his reforms would make the system simpler and more streamlined so the new agency "can get right in there quickly, end the delays, get the money into the families that need it most and make a contribution to supporting family life and tackling child poverty". The new agency is aimed at encouraging estranged parents to make private arrangements, leaving government to deal only with the core of those who cannot reach agreement or are unwilling to pay.

There was support from former welfare minister Frank Field for an extension of absent parents' debts being handed to private debt collection agencies, ensuring the CSA's successor body is not saddled with solving past problems. Such a scheme is reckoned to have collected £320,000 so far. Mr Hutton's ideas were described as "knee-jerk" by former Tory leader Iain Duncan-Smith, while Liberal Democrat spokesman David Laws dismissed the plans as "daft government-by-gimmick". "Listing people's names on a website is likely to be totally ineffective and could be seen by some people more as a badge of pride than a badge of shame," Mr Laws said, adding that the CSA's existing powers to take away driving licences had been used no more than five times each year.

A Scots lawyer specialising in human rights law said Mr Hutton's ideas would be open to legal challenge, as "naming and shaming" publicity could infringe rights to privacy and to a family life, with the children involved being easily identified by such a website. The ideas "sound like scare tactics," according to John Scott, of the Howard League in Scotland: "Given that the main purpose is to make sure the money is recovered, some of the measures they're discussing move into the realm of punishment rather than recovery". He added that the agency could face serious problems with publicity of individual cases as it suffers from a poor track record in getting its payment calculations correct.

One Parent Families, a campaign group, welcomed moves to "put some welly" into collecting payments, reflecting frustration that non-paying absent parents have been getting away too lightly. However, Nick Woodall of the Centre for Separated Families said the government "unwittingly contributed" to conflict between parents. "This seems like it's just another attempt by the government to sound tough on parents, when really what it should be doing is creating services to help them." Non-payment has seen 22 people jailed this year, up from only six last year

http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/76411.html


Racist Chief constable Ian Blair guilty of illegally bugging senior asian officer 11 December 2006


Ian Blair like his partner Bilderberg Blair at No 10 showing there true colours both members of the MASONIC controllers club running their rackets in the UK .Phone tapping their enemies or people they want to destroy for ulterior motives.
==============
'Met police illegally bugged Asian officer'

A tribunal ruled that Ali Dizaei was illegally bugged by the Met

Sir Ian Blair was last night at the centre of a new bugging row after a tribunal ruled he oversaw the illegal telephone tapping of a senior Asian officer. Thousands of calls made by Chief Superintendent Ali Dizaei were listened to by Scotland Yard officers investigating corruption claims. They included advice given by Mr Dizaei in his role as legal adviser to the National Black Police Association to dozens of black and Asian colleagues in dispute with their own forces.

The corruption case ended in chaos at the Old Bailey when Mr Dizaei was cleared of all wrong-doing. He has since returned to work and was paid £80,000 in compensation following a controversial deal brokered by former Home Secretary David Blunkett. Last week the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, headed by a High Court judge, found that the reasons given by the Yard to justify recording the conversations were illegal.

The landmark case is the first time that the reasons used by the police or security services to justify phone tapping have been found to be unlawful. It could also mean that many of the cases which Mr Dizaei dealt with could now be reinvestigated for signs of foul play. In addition, the Yard is now likely to be hit with a fresh round of compensation claims from those officers whose calls were intercepted.

The final bill could run into hundreds of thousands of pounds and is the final nail in the coffin of an ill-fated case which lasted several years and has cost the taxpayer £7 million. In all around 3,500 phone calls were recorded. The ruling is embarrassing for Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian who oversaw the Dizaei inquiry while Deputy Commissioner. Last spring he faced calls for his resignation after it emerged he had personally recorded telephone calls with senior figures including the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith.

Keith Jarrett, the NBPA president, said: "It is a blatant abuse of executive power. This is an attempt to undermine the NBPA and shows that racism is still very much alive in the Metropolitan Police." Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights organisation Liberty, said: "Telephone tapping is a vital crime-fighting tool, but there is far too much scope for abuses within the current system. "Currently police and politicians sign off intercept warrants. This is a more appropriate job for an independent judiciary." A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "We are reviewing the findings of the tribunal and will assess the implications."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=421654&in_page_id=1770


Huntley,police and legal aid board operate a high level masonic protection racket 11 December 2006


PROOF Huntley,police and legal aid board operate a high level masonic protection racket

Huntley was a known child abuser by police but time and again was let off.It was the masonic UK police failures that allowed him to obtain employment in a school despite his history and now the masons operating within the legal aid board are providing his legal team the funds to defend him against one of his rape victims while she receives no legal aid support.

The EVIL of the masonic controllers who control our legal structures are plain to see in the Soham murders
====================
Huntley gets taxpayers' cash for High Court battle...because he fears being branded a pa_edophile

Huntley has launched the legal fight because he does not want to be formally classed as a 'pa_edophile'

A woman who claims she was a child sex victim of Ian Huntley has spoken of her fury after he was controversially granted legal aid to fight a court case against her. The Soham killer has been awarded around £1,000 of taxpayers money to fund a High Court battle with Hailey Giblin who says he indecently assaulted her when she was just 11 years old.

Astonishingly it appears the 32-year-old - jailed for life for the 2002 murders of ten year olds Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman - has launched the fight from his prison cell because he does not want to be formally classed as a 'paedophile'. But the decision to give him state assistance prompted anger last night. Mrs Giblin, 20, who is funding the private prosecution herself, said: "It is absolutely disgusting that a monster like Huntley is receiving money from hard working people to fight me in court.

"I am upset,angry but determined to carry on even if it involves facing him across a courtroom." Mrs Giblin was just 11 when she says Huntley repeatedly sexually assaulted her in an orchard and against a school wall. He threatened to kill her if she told anyone else but within months she reported him to police. Huntley was questioned but never charged.

After Huntley's conviction for the Soham murders, police reopened the case. They took fresh statements from potential witnesses and quizzed Huntley in jail. But in 2005, the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute because of a 'lack of evidence'. This enraged Mrs Giblin who launched a private prosecution in the civil courts. Her aim was to have Huntley named as her attacker. The case has cost her tens of thousands of pounds and she has received no legal aid.

Earlier this year, her legal team, led by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel, QC, served a writ on Huntley via the governor of Wakefield jail in West Yorkshire. Huntley declined to file a defence and in October a High Court judge found in favour of Mrs Giblin. She planned to press on with a compensation claim for damages at a hearing on December 14. But last night it emerged that not only has Huntley decided to contest the case, his application for legal aid has also been approved by the Legal Services Commission.

A stunned Mrs Giblin has now accepted the possibility that, if contested, the case could result in both her and Huntley having to give evidence and face each other across a court room. But she is astonished that Britain's most notorious killer is being funded by the state - while she has to scrimp and save to pay soaring legal bills. If the case does carry on, the legal aid bill will also increase. Mrs Giblin, from Barton-on-Humber, North Lincolnshire, said: "I am told that the reason Huntley is fighting this is that he does not want to officially branded a pa_edophile. "He is quite happy with being branded a child murderer because he can always explain that away as an accident. But for some reason he does not the fact that he abused an 11-year-old girl to become accepted fact. "I think it is an absolute disgrace that he has received legal aid and someone like me, who has been let down by every single level of the criminal justice system, has not.

"I feel sorry for every single hardworking taxpayer who will now have to fund a monster like Huntley. I nearly choked when I found out." She added: "This could end up in a trial because it will be my word against his. I am more than happy to be cross examined about this and face him in court. "I don't believe he can get away with referring back to the statement he made to police in 1998. This has been his previous tactic but it will not work if he is being questioned in court. "Many people think I should just let this go and try and forget about it.

"But I have long come to the conclusion that if you want something doing properly then you have to do it yourself. Then, if it all goes wrong, I can't blame anyone else. "I also want to make sure that he's locked behind bars for the rest of his life. There is always a chance that he will be released back into society one day. "I want to prove to others that allegations like this will not simple go away but will be dealt with." Mrs Giblin estimates the cost of her case to be £60,000. This is made up of lawyers fees, the cost of a top barrister and the commissioning of reports from expert witnesses.

Central to her case is a video of the interview she gave to police in 1998 when making the original allegation. Documents seen by the Daily Mail show that Huntley's lawyers, Liverpool-based firm AS Law, intend to have the October judgement 'set aside'. Huntley's team say they have a 'valid defence'. The case will be heard by a judge in Manchester on Thursday.

After the Soham trial there was fury over the fact that Huntley's criminal defence team ran up a legal aid bill of more than £700,000. A spokesman for the government body which process legal aid applications, said: "The Legal Services Commission can confirm that it has provided a small amount of funding to Ian Huntley in relation to an action involving Hailey Giblin.

"Clearly this is a very sensitive case, however, the Legal Services Commission has a statutory responsibility to provide funding for cases where the client meets a financial eligibility test and a legal merits test, which consider factors such as the case's likelihood of success. "We cannot differentiate between applicants for legal aid on the grounds that a decision to grant funding may be unpopular in a particular case." Huntley is not the first notorious prisoner to be granted taxpayer support to fight legal battles.

In 2001 it emerged that mass murderer Dennis Nilsen had received aid fight a lengthy battle for the 'right' receive hard core pornography in his prison cell. After Huntley's conviction for the murders of Holly and Jessica in December 2003, it emerged that numerous young women had made complaints about his predatory sexual behaviour in the years running up to the deaths. Between June 1995 and July 1999, at least ten complaints - including that of Hailey Giblin (then Edwards) - were made to police and social services about alleged sexual offences but nothing was done.

Despite this Huntley was able to obtain a job as a school caretaker in Soham. In part this was because basic vetting checks were not carried out. But a lot of the information on Huntley compiled by Humberside Police had been 'weeded out' and was wiped from the force computer. A damning report by Sir Michael Bichard into the errors triggered the resignation of Humberside chief constable David Westwood. However Huntley has always refused to accept his guilt. He has consistently told family and friends that the murders were an accident and that Holly had died after falling into the bath.

He has never given any kind of convincing explanation for why Jessica died. In the police video shot in 1998, Hailey fights back tears as she recalls how Huntley lured her into the woods, indecently assaulted her and threatened to strangle her if she told anyone.

TIMELINE

September 1997: Hailey Edwards, then aged 11, says she is indecently assaulted by Ian Huntley at an orchard near her family home in Humberston, near Grimsby. Over a period of two hours he attacks her several times.

July 1998: Hailey, now 12, plucks up the courage to report Huntley to police. Huntley is interviewed and bailed. Humberside Police decide not to send the case to the Crown Prosecution Service. The intelligence report is later wiped from the force computer.

December 2003: Huntley is convicted of the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in Soham, Cambridgeshire.

September 2004: Police reopen Hailey's case. Now known as Hailey Giblin, her relatives and potential witnesses are interviewed. Huntley is spoken to in jail.

July 2005: The CPS decide not to proceed because of a 'lack of evidence'.

September 2006: Hailey launches a civil action against Huntley, claiming indecent assault. He is given 14 days to respond. October 2006: He files no defence and judgement is made in favour of Hailey at the High Court in Manchester.

December 2006: Huntley engages solicitors to fight the case and is awarded legal aid.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=421683&in_page_id=1770&ct=5


Feminist/masonic attack on heterosexual males 9 December 2006


Child support and domestic violence.
A feminist/masonic attack on heterosexual males

The male hating BBC run by the feminists /masons once again discuss Child support on breakfast TV.NEVER when they discuss domestic violence or child support do they interview MENS groups ,if they did they would be forced to expose the real truth of the masonic bully boy mobsters who use ex partners to propagate lies in the ever changing system called feminist/masonic family law. Thousands of men hounded into suicide because of bully boy tactics used by devil worshipping judges and lawyers ,NEVER juries .A self appointed elite set up to thieve as much from MEN not part of their sinister creepy network.The devious despicable BBC along with their masonic pals at Britains other TV networks have been consistent in their condemnation of the UK's heterosexual males in separation.

One perfect example of their double standards is how they can condemn gold digger Heather Mills for using the same dirty tricks of domestic abuse and child support to justify stealing ex husband Paul McCartneys vast wealth gained through his hard work creating the most amazing music the world has been moved by.Men looking on and watching HER using lawyers and judges to try and remove him from his homes ,no one would deny he has a right to keep .However the family courts are awash with human rights abuses of the most despicable kind .Made that way to ensure the masonic structure supporting the crooked judges and lawyers can fleece the maximum amount from unsuspecting fathers that ultimately line the monolithic masonic coffers. Family law is a law that uses the most despicable ever changing goal posts to lead men into a masonic trap.Any man should know that when he signs a marriage certificate he signs a contract.Not one that is set in stone but one that allows the government and judiciary to change the goalposts when it suits to ALL their financial advantage and especially to the advantage of the feminists and masons who gain substantially from the daily robbery going on in family courts up and down the length and breadth of the UK.

Family law ensures there is never a JURYonly hand picked masonic judges who act as the gravy train for all the other leeches who trap men in long term litigation to absorb virtually all assets obtained prior to separation.They could not sustain such a billion pound criminal industry without the support of their masonic buddies running the BBC ,ITV,CH4 ,CH5 and SKY. It is the failure to address the male perspective on the con men and women running family law and its star chamber courts that clearly shows a system that cannot answer why.

1) Family courts are held in secret?

2)Domestic abuse indeed any physical violence is a crime.Why do they SELDOM try these types of cases before juries?But set up specialist(no jury) courts to deal with these.

3)Why do the judges running star chamber family courts not have to disclose ALL associations including memberships of devil worshipping secret societies ? Serious conflicts of interest would arise if they where forced to do so.

4)Why does the media fail to address the massive land and property fraud attached to the domestic abuse/child support lobby .We calculate this runs into BILLIONS of pounds where lawyers and judges are stealing land,property and business's and using third parties to purchase these back at well below market values ?

The UK masonic police ,who are used to evict males from their homes after illegal court orders are obtained by crooked lawyers from crooked judges ,are also part of the buy back of repossessed houses .Senior police officers sitting in large residences bought at well below market value due to their assistance in illegal evictions and repossessions.

5)This is a masonic racket of the most enormous kind that has been allowed to continue only due to the failures of Britains masonic media to EXPOSE the major human rights abuses of men caught in a trap perpetrated by the most sinister group of secret society mobsters, who make Hitlers mob pale by comparison.

There are lies,damn lies and the BBC male hating statistics.


JAMES BOND THE ILLUMINATI/MASONIC/ROYALIST PROPAGANDA MACHINE 8 December 2006


After watching the latest James Bond film it is crystal clear after you strip away the action scenes,the girls,the fast cars,the money and everything else associated with fighting for QUEEN and country(next) this is one of the BIGGEST brainwashing machines the masonic mobsters have ever funded.

The licence to kill function of 007 to protect first and foremost THE QUEEN suggests Britain and its monarchy need protecting from ALL the bad guys lurking away in different exotic parts of the world. But the opposite is the case ,it is the citizens of the UK that need protection from the sinister goings on of MI5 and MI6, the listening service for the high level masonic controllers acting as a shadow government ,protecting the best interests of one of the richest dynasties the world has ever seen. Our royalty and its British empire has been founded on the massive rape and pillage of countries throughout the world using the most ruthless abuses of the people of those lands.The same mindset acting under the guise of the crown and who control our legal systems and police are systematically robbing the citizens(not subjects) of the UK blind.

The ruthlessness that was used to hold onto the British empire until its demise is being turned inwards on its own people with a massive campaign of land,property,business and child theft that makes Hitlers mob pale by comparison.The ILLUSION created by the UK's media and icons like JAMES BOND are purely that AN UTTER MASONIC ILLUSION that ensures the rich establishment types remain ,using their shadow government,in total control of its citizens(subjects to them).

Let no person be fooled by the fast cars,women,money and gadgets this is a facade protecting MONSTERS who have been hiding behind the smokescreen invented by Britains media for eons.The latest gadget M instructed Bond to be fitted with was a MICROCHIP to ensure he could be tracked worldwide.This being a devious way of preparing us all for the next stage in the MASONIC CONTROLLERS PLANS who envisage us all as technological slaves in their perverse world of high tech surveillance.

Blair and his new labour cronies like Brown ,Reid,Blunkett and Cameron and his corrupt tories are part of the master plan of the NEW WORLD ORDER and the only two who will receive British media coverage in the run up to the next election.THEY dont want anyone not associated with the Bilderbergs or Old etonian forelock tuggers to have an opportunity to break thro the sinister undemocratic system of government the British public have had to endure for so long.They should all be jailed for their criminal past not promoted as worthy of our votes.
======================
http://www.surveillancecommissioners.gov.uk/

This website is primarily designed to be used by those who authorise and conduct covert surveillance operations and use covert human intelligence sources (as informants and undercover officers are now known). It shows you how to carry out these activities in compliance with the powers granted by Parliament, and how the OSC monitors the exercise of those powers. By way of practical help we have identified some key points, some sources of advice, and some examples of good and bad practice. I hope that the website will also be useful to members of the public who are interested in finding out about covert surveillance. It is worth noting that although this website is relevant to most public authorities, it is not concerned with telephone intercepts. The basic legal principles are to be found in the Police Act 1997, to which we shall refer as 'the 1997 Act', the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (`RIPA') and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Act 2000 (`RIP(S)A').

We intend to develop the site. How we do so will depend on the use that is made of it. So please let us know how you think it can be improved.

The Rt Hon Sir Christopher Rose
Chief Surveillance Commissioner
Office of Surveillance Commissioners
PO Box 29105,
London, SW1V 1ZU
Tel: 020 7828 3421
Fax: 020 7592 1788


UK's dimwitted bully boy masonic police at their best 7 December 2006


The UK's dimwitted bully boy masonic police at their best
=============
Lecturer on Ryanair ‘flight from hell’ is admonished

It was a flight from hell and ended with a lecturer leading a passenger revolt against the budget airline. John Wilkie snapped when a terror alert caused the Ryanair flight to be grounded and his young family had to spend nearly six hours on the plane. Unable to get water for his two children and dismayed by the attitude and lack of information from Ryanair staff, he ignored the pilot's orders and tried to disembark – followed by around 30 other passengers. After finally being coaxed back into the cabin, Mr Wilkie and his fellow travellers were stunned when police came on board to arrest him. Mr Wilkie, 36, who teaches stage management at the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama in Glasgow, was taken to the police station and charged with causing a security alert. His wife, Michelle, was also accused of assaulting an air hostess during the fracas.

At Edinburgh Sheriff Court, Mr Wilkie admitted the offence but was admonished after dozens of fellow passengers wrote to the courts in his defence. Sheriff Andrew Lothian insisted it was "ridiculous" that Mr Wilkie had been prosecuted for the offence and said he was owed an apology by Ryanair. The case comes two months after the Irish carrier was told by the Office of Fair Trading to stop flouting European Union rules that require stranded passengers to be offered sustenance, overnight accommodation and compensation. Mr Wilkie, from Moodiesburn, Lanarkshire, who has never been in trouble with the law before now plans to bring a civil action against the airline. He said: "I am absolutely disgusted with the way this has been handled. We all understand why these security measures are in place but this was bordering on hysterical. "We were herded about like cattle and the attitude of airline staff was unbelievable – they acted as if they had been dragged off the street rather than trained professionals. "If it had just been me and my wife, I would just have got on with it but we have two kids aged three and five and this was unacceptable. I feel vindicated by the court ruling."

The family's ordeal began after a holiday in France ended with a flight from Paris to Prestwick on April 12. Ryanair was forced to divert the return journey 20 minutes from Prestwick after a terror alert. The plane landed at Edinburgh. More than five hours after setting off from the French capital, the Wilkies and around 200 other passengers were still on the tarmac at Edinburgh. Mr Wilkie became exasperated by the lack of information from airline staff. Stewardesses also refused requests for refreshments for the children. Backed by his fellow passengers he told the cabin crew he was taking his family off the plane. Mr Wilkie was told by airline staff that this was not permitted. However, he claims the pilot told him to go ahead.

He and the other passengers who followed were persuaded by BAA staff to reboard the plane. Police then stunned passengers by marching on to the plane to investigate claims by airline staff that there had been a security breach. Mr Wilkie was escorted to the nearest police station to be charged. However, after reading dozens of letters of support for Mr Wilkie Sheriff Lothian decided to admonish him. He insisted it was Mr Wilkie who had been the victim.

Sheriff Lothian said: "I feel you are due an apology but it is not for me to say sorry for something that is outwith my control." The ordeal has put Mr Wilkie off travelling abroad again. Last night, a Ryanair spokeswoman stood by their actions and insisted staff should follow the same procedure next time. She said: "Ryanair will press charges against any passenger who disobeys the instructions of our crew. "The crew are in charge of safety on board the aircraft and their instructions must be followed at all times."

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/76186.html


Masonic tyranny 7 December 2006


The UK masonic press continually promote the monsters controlling the British legal system and their reasons for the UK's crime statistics. What they FAIL time and again to address is that the people charged with running our courts are THE most corrupt by a mile .We have a system were only devil worshipping monsters get promoted to high legal office including chief constables with sworn allegiances to a corrupt crown busily identifying new ways of stealing peoples homes and livelyhoods under the guise of UK law.

Our organisations have compiled mountains of evidence to show it is not small time crooks who destroy Britains infrastructure or deplete its resources but the filling of the monolithic masonic coffers with money stolen by Britains corrupt legal system. All of it sanctioned by their masonic press owner buddies who act as a catalyst ensuring these evil bastards continue their reign of terror against the unsuspecting British public.

We know the chain of command comes from unelected senior judges sworn to uphold EVIL masonic principles and to ensure JUSTICE is never seen to be done.That would not provide the necessary massive land and property theft which ensures a steady and ever increasing money pot for their illuminati masters who ultimately sanction the individuals targetted for asset stripping.One single trip to ANY UK court assures the means to that end. We have a massive and growing worldwide network of contacts who are daily provided with an alternative to the utter evil propaganda perpetrated by the UK's press who try and brainwash us into thinking ALL is well in the UK.It is far from that it is an oppressive evil den of iniquity that makes Hitlers mob pale by comparison.

It is not MORE power these evil mobsters need it is a complete and utter change from MASONIC RULE BY TYRANNY and the removal of ALL secret society monsters from every part of the UK's system of justice and policing in an open society.Until then we will continue to see family after family destroyed by the sinister control those who charged themselves with judging us and who are totally UNFIT to judge ANYONE due to their secret society agendas assisting in the domination and control of us all with their NEW WORLD ORDER PLANS.