The Brandon Corey Story 29 October 2006
Two years ago this website announced that Truthseeker TV (TTV) was coming to television. Our first episode, “The Brandon Corey Story”, chronicled the bizarre story of a man who went looking for the truth and came back with evidence that linked Vice President Dick Cheney to secret societies, Bohemian Grove and Satanists.
The network refused to air this controversial programming and TTV lost its deal on TV. Two weeks later, our offices in Los Angeles, CA. were professionally ransacked and robbed. The burglars stole all of the original masters of “The Brandon Corey Story”. But we had back-ups and we have reassembled it and are now making this DVD available to you.
Malcolm Chisholm Scotlands Mengeles 27 October 2006
More than one thousand MEN have been convicted by a masonic kangaroo court in Glasgow Sheriff court.
Men accused by bitter ex partners making, in many cases, spurious allegations of abuse
which may include raised voices and being criminalized by a bunch of hand picked masonic judges acting as lackies for the crown.
That crown then stealing these mens children, homes, business's and assets similar to the despicable goldgigger Heather Mills and her attempts to force more money from her ex-husband Paul McCartney who she married to prop up her finances using allegations of abuse .
These courts are causing major human rights abuses by failing to ensure a jury is being used to convict men and also many of them wont even get representation in that kangaroo court established by Scotlands equivalent to Mengeles, Malcolm Chisholm .
As health minister he was responsible for using the mental health act to chemically lobotomize our member George Farquhar, Dixie Deans and ultimately murder Andy McCardle in Carstairs concentration camp.
Malcolm Chisholm and his domestic abuse MOB are using the most sinister human rights abuses to line the pockets of the corrupt Scottish Crown while the top crook Colin Boyd was in charge. He was responsible with Chisholm for the psychological abuses of Shirley McKie.
While the Scottish media continue to support these MASONIC monsters we will continue to see diabolical acts similar to Hitlers mob by distorting the real truth of what is going on in Scotland.
They have NEVER reported Chisholm's part in abusing innocent men using the evil Scottish mental health act.
CHISHOLM like BLUNKETT is a MASONIC MONSTER and his vile acts and actions will not continue even with the support of his masonic pals at most of the Scottish media groups he uses to impose these monstrous evils.
1000 convicted in new abuse courts
More than 1000 people have been convicted at Scotland's only specialist domestic abuse court over the past two years, the Scottish Executive rev-ealed yesterday.
It is the second anniversary of the court, set up as a two-year long pilot project.
However, despite the apparent success of such court schemes for domestic abuse and drugs, the executive has refused to agree plans to roll them out across Scotland, bringing accusations from politicians and women's groups of ministers of failing to follow through with their policies for resourcing reasons, leading to a justice "postcode lottery".
The court was set up to speed up cases of domestic abuse and to provide a better service for victims. The preliminary evaluation indicates it has been a success, but the pilot only applies to the south side of Glasgow.
Dr Mairead Tagg, a psychologist with Greater Easterhouse Women's Aid, said: "This is creating a postcode lottery whereby some women get a superb service but other women across Glasgow and Scotland are being denied this.
"In principle, everyone is in favour of the court, but it comes down to resources and they have only said they will fund this pilot for a further year. This makes long-term planning impossible."
The specialist drug courts run in Fife and Glasgow. Following the completion of their two-year pilot stage earlier this year ministers said they would only continue in the two centres. Evaluation of the courts was positive, but found that they cost £6m over two years.
Executive figures revealed that between October 2004 and September 2006, the domestic abuse court dealt with 1248 new cases and there were 1053 convictions.
The figures indicate cases are dealt with much more quickly and efficiently in the specialist court. Scottish Women's Aid said this made a dramatic difference as many women dropped cases in the past because of the stress of waiting months to go to court.
The executive has given £200,000 in funding to the domestic abuse court pilot and promised a further £122,000 for the coming year. The evaluation will be completed and published next spring.
Communities Minister Malcolm Chisholm said: "More incidents are being reported to the police and perpetrators rightly need to be held to account. "The pilot is being fully evaluated and we will continue to consider ways in which we can support those taking this often traumatic, brave step to seeking justice."
Masonic police protecting criminal brothers 26 October 2006
Two masonic police helping their criminal lodge buddies
Corrupt officers jailed for leaks
Two former Nottinghamshire police officers have been
jailed after pleading guilty to corruption charges.
Charles Fletcher, 25, and Phillip Parr, 40, admitted
at Birmingham Crown Court to separately passing data
of serious inquiries on to suspected criminals.
Fletcher, a trainee detective, was jailed for seven
years and Parr, a former Pc, was sentenced to 12
The 25-year-old leaked details of investigations
including the murder of Nottingham jeweller Marian
Fletcher also admitted two charges of conspiracy to
pervert the course of justice.
Corrupt police officers do untold damage to the
criminal justice system
Judge John Saunders QC
Five men who admitted obtaining the information have
been jailed for a total of 15 years.
Jason Grocock, 33, was convicted of conspiracy to
commit misconduct in a public office and two further
charges of conspiracy to pervert the course of
justice. He was sentenced to four years.
David Barrett, 40, was convicted of two charges of
conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office and
was sentenced to three years.
Darren Peters, 38, and Javade Rashid, 40, were
convicted of the same charge and were sentenced to
four years and to six months respectively.
The fifth man cannot be named for legal reasons.
The court heard Fletcher trawled police computer data
bases to find information that he supplied to
criminals for a two-and-a-half-year period between
December 2002 and June last year.
He sought information, about the Marian Bates murder
in 2003 and the double murder of Joan and John
Stirland, who were executed at their bungalow in
Trusthorpe, Lincolnshire, in August 2004.
The court heard that the details Fletcher was able to
glean about the murder cases were of "limited
significance", partly because he was under
surveillance by other officers.
The information was handed to Grocock, the manager of
Limey's clothing store in Nottingham, who passed them
on to criminals.
Fletcher also revealed the identities of suspects,
witnesses and victims involved in other cases, as well
as conducting intelligence checks on suspected
criminals at their request.
He then faxed the information, which included details
of surveillance, vehicles associated with them and
information from anonymous informants, to the
suspects, the court heard.
In return for his services, the 25-year-old received
discounts on designer suits from a Nottingham fashion
The judge said the effect was that people suspected of
serious crime infiltrated the police force through
Fletcher which could have prevented or delayed the
arrest of criminals and helped them to carry out
Parr supplied confidential information on two
The two men acted separately, but the information from
Parr was passed back to the same criminals via Javade
Rashid and David Barrett, the court heard.
'Contempt and anger'
Assistant Chief Constable Ian Ackerley said the force
had suspected for some time that people within the
organisation were feeding information to criminals.
He said officers had set up a covert operation to find
Chief Constable Steve Green said he felt "contempt and
anger" for the two officers, both of whom have lost
He said their "base and selfish behaviour" had damaged
the reputation of the "fine, decent, hardworking,
honourable people" who served Nottinghamshire Police.
"We have been let down and, more importantly, the
people we serve have been let down.
"Our integrity is our greatest asset. It must not be
compromised. We never flinched in our duty to
investigate our suspicions and in prosecuting those
who betrayed our trust."
The court heard Fletcher wrote a to a friend while on
remand saying that it took him a long time to "come to
terms with the shame of my actions, but most
especially the betrayal of all my old colleagues".
"In answering why, I feel my greed, vanity and naivety
were to blame... I was blind to the consequences of my
actions and chose to ignore them," he said.
"So selfishness played a big part in my downfall as I
showed no regard for how my actions would affect my
family, friends and those close to me."
Details of the case were not released until Thursday
due to legal reasons.
BBC ignoring public opinion 26 October 2006
What our groups have been saying about the BBC for
YEARS.They are the Illuminati propaganda merchants.
This article still presents a distorted view of what
is behind the Bloody Big Con
BBC 'guilty' of ignoring public opinion says senior
The public service broadcaster has come under fire
from one its senior executives for not listening to
A senior BBC executive has admitted the politically
correct views of the corporation are at odds with most
of its viewers.
BBC commissioning editor for documentaries Richard
Klein admitted the broadcaster was out of touch with
the British public, saying it was guilty of "ignoring"
Speaking to a room full of TV viewers and BBC staff,
he suggested that if the current situation continued
it could affect the organisation's long-term future.
Klein said: "By and large, people who work at the BBC
think the same and it's not the way the audience
thinks. That's not long term sustainable."
"We pride ourselves on being 'of the people', and it's
pathetic.....Channel 4 tends to laugh at people, the
BBC ignores them."
His comments, reported in the corporation's in-house
magazine, come on the back of news earlier this week
that a string of BBC executives and journalists have
admitted that the corporation is institutionally
Details from a recent "impartiality" summit held at
the BBC highlighted how some of the corporation's own
top staff now believe it is guilty of promoting
left-wing views, is biased against Christianity and as
an organisation is disproportionately dominated by
GAYS and ethnic minorities.
It was also claimed the BBC overtly promotes
multiculturalism and is anti-American and
Klein, who made his views known at an "audience
festival" organised by the BBC last week to find out
what its viewers think, admitted that the BBC's
liberal internal culture did not match that of the
wider British public.
He said: "Most people at the BBC don't live lives like
this, but these are our licence payers. It's our job
to reflect and engage."
The TV executive, who sponsored a study to find out
what issues concerned viewers, even warned other BBC
staff about the dangers of ignoring popular opinion.
"They may be challenging to us, but don't dismiss
them", he said.
His comments come after repeated claims that the BBC
has misjudged the mood of British public.
Last month the corporation was deluged with complaints
after a Muslim extremist was given 12 minutes of
airtime on Radio 4's flagship Today programme.
It also came under attack in the summer when it
broadcast a "sick" comedy, which showed Tony Blair
being assasinated and terrorists crashing a jet into
The BBC was also criticised last year after it was
revealed that the corporation had cautioned
journalists against using the word terrorist -
claiming the word was too judgmental.
More recently the BBC has agonised over whether
news-reader Fiona Bruce should be allowed to wear a
necklace with a cross on it.
Research conducted by the BBC showed that many viewers
felt "gagged and alone" and also believed mainstream
views were being driven underground.
Ann Davies, who carried out the research for the
corporation, openly questioned whether the BBC should
change its approach.
She asked: "Should we, the BBC, be a pressure valve
for that opinion? Should we help break the contraints
of the PC police?"
Research into audience members views showed that many
thought that political correctness had become endemic
One said: "Politicians know more about how a Muslim
lives than they do about what it's like to be me, day
in, day out."
The West's Masonic hold over wealth 24 October 2006
There is clear evidence anyone earning in excess of £50,000 anywhere in the world where masonic halls flourish,those salaries are in the main paid to devil worshippers.
The evidence shows the enslavement of anyone not in the devil worshipping club is confined to salaries well below that figure.Due to the sinister way they control the vast bulk of the worlds economies, they distort competition,use their banking paymasters to railroad the funds to create masonic wealth for its members at the utter exclusion of everyone else who hasn't sold their soul to the devil.
It is not the case that if you are intelligent and have good business skills you will succeed in the Wests masonic world most have to survive in.The unfair advantage given by masonic bankers and the legal structures which support it ensure the only ones who achieve high status and salaries to go with it are the less than average dim wits who regularly swear blood curdling oaths. That then ensures their utter commitment to an evil regime that dominates the financial,political and legal worlds mainly in the west,something the middle east are fighting to avoid being enslaved in.
The worlds mineral wealth has been plundered by the ILLUMINATI overlords(BUSH AND BLAIR) and is intent on using the latest technologies to further enslave us with their government lackies and goffers to bring in their monitoring systems that they think will KEEP THEM ON TOP.
We throw the gauntlet down to these devil worshipping scumbags that their plans will continue to be scuppered and ultimately destroyed by those plans backfiring and HISTORY being rewritten .This will ensure they are held accountable for the diabolical acts they have made upon this earth to advance their devil worshipping goals.Many of us previously victims of an evil system of psychological torture ,abuse,child and property theft via the bullying network they have set up to try and thwart exposure of how they control the west's economies.
AIDED BY THEIR MASONIC PALS CONTROLLING THE UK AND USA'S MEDIA
Disbarred lawyer jailed for contempt 21 October 2006
Barbara Johnson is one of the very few HONEST lawyers who has been fighting the corrupt legal system in the USA for as long as we have known her.
The crooks running the system have been trying to shut her up for years while she has been trying to expose how corrupt family law is in the USA.
Disbarred lawyer jailed for contempt
Barbara C. Johnson, an Andover lawyer and an unsuccessful independent
candidate for governor in 2002, was jailed indefinitely yesterday after a Supreme
Judicial Court justice held her in contempt for allegedly practicing law after
she was disbarred.
After a two-day hearing, Justice Francis X. Spina ordered the 72-year-old
lawyer jailed for continuing to represent clients after her disbarment took
effect Sept. 8, according to Assistant Bar Counsel Susan Strauss Weisberg, who
sought the punishment.
Johnson admitted that she continued representing clients, but said that she
was struggling to find other lawyers to take her cases. ``There's nothing
malicious here," she said. ``I'm thinking, `Don't abandon your clients.' "
The Board of Bar Overseers recommended that Johnson be disbarred for numerous
ethical lapses, including posting confidential information on her website
about a boy who was allegedly sexually abused and mixing a former client's funds
with her own.
She appealed the ruling to Spina, who upheld it in August and ordered Johnson
to stop practicing law in 30 days.
Weisberg said Johnson will be released if she obeys the disbarment order.
That order requires her to notify courts, clients, and opposing lawyers that
she is no longer a licensed attorney.
New York Times
The Dumbing Down of America 20 October 2006
by Manuel Valenzuela
Something is amiss in the great nation called America.
Ominous sirens warning this reality can be heard
emanating loudly through invisible winds of change
circulating our towns and cities. The American people
are being strangulated; unbeknownst to the masses they
are being transformed and conditioned, becoming the
entity the elite have long sought, the culmination of
decades of social engineering designed to make of
hundreds of millions the slaves of times past and the
automatons of the future.
Yet in this present day we find ourselves in,
struggling to comprehend a world gone mad, unable to
discern neither the direction we are headed nor the
inevitable course time is guiding us on. It is because
of what has been done to us, and is presently being
done to our children, that we fail to comprehend the
severity of the road that lies ahead. Quite successful
have the elite become in shifting the balance of power
from the masses to themselves. How, one might wonder,
has this been accomplished, especially when we are the
many and they the few?
It is through the dumbing down of America, the
methodical destruction and purposeful elimination of
the means by which a society educates and enlightens
itself. The evisceration of a system that extols
accountability and dialogue, opens up the gates of
opportunity with the keys of ability, questions
authority and seeks debate, creates a wealth of
knowledge and illuminates talent and that births an
informed citizenry and creates free thinking,
analytical minds has been slowly implemented for the
last several decades. The dumbing down of America
continues into the present, unrelenting and
unhindered, squashing the masses for the benefit of
A giant threat to the system is being disposed of,
systematically and without remorse, making of America
and its citizens yet one more cog in the engine called
capitalistic exploitation of humanity.
What has happened to the Pax Americana?
Here stands the Pax Americana, the most imposing
Empire that ever rose from the short reign of human
civilization, responsible for placing the entire
manifestation of world citizens at the threshold of
perilous danger. It is the Pax Americana that has
unwound the stitches holding a volatile world
together, the nation that has over the last fifty
years caused so much damage to the peoples of the
globe. The karma of ceaseless negative energy is
coming back to haunt an empire whose actions, while
helping enrich its own belly and those residing in its
entrails, have decimated untold millions whose only
crime was being born in lands destined to suffer the
harsh exploitation of America and its capitalistic
How has a once admired and loved leader of nations
fallen from grace in such a short period of time? What
has happened to a populace living in the wealthiest
nation in human civilization? Why has the United
States transformed itself into the malicious beast the
world sees through frightful eyes?
Gluttony and materialism have enveloped all corners of
the United States, from Pacific to Atlantic Oceans,
from the border with Canada to the one with Mexico.
The principles of consumerism and greed are
all-encompassing, years ago having replaced virtues
long since gone. The clandestine enslavement hidden in
mass production and ever-longer working hours has in
the last few decades become the value by which we
measure one’s worth to society.
The ability to question authority has vanished in a
haze of indifference, even as the evaporation of the
American mind continues unabated. Government has been
transformed right in front of our eyes, becoming not
democracy but corporatism, the marriage between the
corporate and government elite. Our freedoms and
liberties are in shambles, now fragile porcelain being
decimated by the thundering herd of bulls in
The government of, by and for the people is now
comprised of leaches flourishing in rotten swamps,
prostitutes roaming bordellos masquerading as palaces
of governance and fecal matter prospering in the
nation’s sewers. Corporations and their minions we
help elect dominate and transform society, leading us
into the black holes they easily maneuver us into. We
are being used and abused, yet with the dumbing down
of America easily controlled beings we have turned
into, comatose to the danger we have embraced and
oblivious to the strings attached to our appendages.
Something eerie seems to have engulfed us in the land
of the free and the home of the brave. From the land
where all men are created equal has equality
disappeared; from a nation espousing freedom has
freedom been eviscerated. Once brave dissenters and
seekers of accountability have gone missing, allowing
free reign to those endowed with power. Free-thinking
and analytical minds are as rare as the great apes
humanity is making extinct. Rare is the citizen not
captive to fear, insecurity and intimidation. The
ability to question authority or to seek
accountability has collapsed along with the towers of
the World Trade Center. A world existing beyond the
borders and shores of America, containing six billion
fellow humans, has been forgotten and disregarded as
ignorance to cultures, nations, beliefs and
ethnicities is conditioned into our minds practically
Something is amiss in a nation where one would expect
the plenitudes of Empire to trickle down into every
man, woman and child. To bestow upon its citizens the
tools needed to seek true freedom of thought and a
path towards enlightenment would be expected of an
American utopia that is more often preached rather
than practiced. Yet the question arises as to the
cause of why hundreds of millions continue to fall
downwards into empty wells of promises unkept instead
of reaching for the zenith of those fulfilled.
What mechanisms left to erode the citizenry of free
thought and freedom of mind have been allowed to
linger in American society, and how have they been
allowed to remain when the reality of what has
occurred continues to degrade the Pax Americana from
the inside out?
Conditioned Producers and Consumers
Spawned from the assembly line called human
procreation we open our eyes to a world ready to
transform our life energies into expendable
disseminators of the patterns of production and
consumption that will mark our time on Earth, in
essence becoming the reason for our existence. To the
system called capitalism we become nothing more than a
number which will in time be exploited to the full
extent envisaged by man. We are given social security
numbers, digits that will follow us through the
journey from newborn to cadaver. To the system we are
this number, easily traceable, easily conditioned.
Television begins to inculcate us with rampant
bombardments of advertisements, thereby beginning to
condition the young, innocent mind to a life trained
for consumption. The foods we eat and the products we
buy begin establishing the tastes we will forever
enjoy. Associations of pleasure, ingrained tastes and
smells, nostalgia of fantasy and perfection enter the
young brain. It is because of this that corporations
want to hook us from the first moments of infancy so
loyal lifelong consumers we become. To the innocent
and pure mind television thus becomes the window to a
world that is neither real nor easy. The virgin brain
sees in the shows it is blitzkrieged with a fiction
that in reality does not exist. It sees perfection,
fantasy, beauty, consumption and loyal acquiescence,
and, with the passage of time, seeks to emulate this
world in a false belief that it can be attained.
Ingrained in this principle is the belief, channeled
by corporations, that to achieve what can never be a
person must consume and produce, be obedient to
authority, friendly to her corporate masters and eager
to embrace what society dictates. The dumbing down of
America thus begins.
As television becomes parent, teacher, role model,
babysitter and entertainer to the child, given the
abandonment of historical parental roles thanks to
society’s pressure to produce and consume, everything
shown becomes everything learned, thus habituating a
child to the role corporations have decided to bestow
onto him. When everything seen on the screen is
created, controlled, manipulated and disseminated by
the corporate world the child’s perception of what
reality encompasses will indeed also conform to the
corporate vision. After image after image, fantasy
after fantasy, conditioning after conditioning, the
young human mind has no choice but to accept the
commands of the brainwashing taking place right in
front of his or her baby eyes.
It follows that children learn every behavior from
their parents as well. From the very beginning
entrenched behaviors to produce and consume become
ingrained in the young brain. The long hours at work,
the short amount of time spent with the child, the
abandonment of parental roles and supervision, the
incessant drive for consumption, the wasting of money
and pursuit of material possessions, the behaviors of
stress, depression, unhappiness, anger and frustration
are all absorbed by a mind that in infancy acts like a
sponge, learning human society from those closest to
its environment, whether it is family or television.
In adulthood, these same behaviors will be manifested,
thereby helping fulfill the role of producer and
consumer the corporate world has reserved for yet one
more human energy sprouting from the conveyor belt of
procreation. Thanks to the television and parental
subservience to the same system of their youth, one’s
progeny will become the bogged down producer of the
same products he or she will later voraciously and
seemingly without conscious consume.
The vicious circle that is the virus of American
capitalism infects seemingly from birth, inoculating
children to the vices of exploitation from which they
will forever derive their existence. It is at the
height of innocence that the forces of capitalism
attack, attaching themselves in the depths of a human
brain, dissolving precepts not in tune with its
compulsive and exploitive self. Once attached the
virus is not easily displaced, thereby becoming
personality as well as behavior. From the cradle to
the grave, destiny in today’s America is guided by the
corporate world and its sinister virus, helping not
its host but its disseminator, unleashing wave after
wave of unhappy and exploited producer and easily
conditioned and controlled consumer.
Consequences of a Controlled Populace
Education in the United States has become an exercise
in government and corporate brainwashing, used to
achieve a citizenry devoid of analytical and
free-thinking minds. The purpose, quite simply, is to
retain the class warfare structure that has marked
American society for decades. Education has become a
tool used to make the wealthy richer and the poor more
indigent. It is now a mechanism to separate the have
nots from the haves, the higher castes from the
untouchables. As it stands today, though certainly
being eviscerated more and more daily, education is
making of the masses impotent creatures of
indifference, happily droned into complacency and
deprived of a knowledge that once served to curtail
the power of the elite that run the nation.
The result is the age of corporatism, the age of
unfettered and unaccountable power and the control of
the masses through media manipulation, societal
fabrication and education eradication. As the world
slowly passes through the sands of time the people of
the United States, those living inside what has become
a most hated geopolitical entity, are seeing the
result of being dumbed down and of letting
incompetents, warmongers, profiteers and deranged
zealots run unfettered and unopposed, ransacking the
globe, its people and land in the process.
Today we see the ramifications of a citizenry that has
allowed itself to be made ignorant through its
submission to those in power whose purposeful
malfeasance continues to destroy the very essence of
knowledge that grants freedom to enslaved minds. Iraq
and the coming disaster in the Middle East are a
consequence to the decimation of education in the
United States. George W. Bush is a consequence of the
dumbing down of America, to which he owes his very
position perched like the vulture he is atop the dying
tree of America that has been contaminated by his
inept and infected claws smeared in human blood.
Those in power have succeeded in making the masses a
herd of sheep following the shepherd straight into the
slaughterhouse, unaware of the destiny that awaits
them nor of their role in the furthering of death,
destruction and violence now gripping the world. Like
a deer caught in headlights, the masses are
hypnotized, unable to see beyond the sight of their
own meeting with a fate conditioned into our brains
from infancy that is destroying freedom, knowledge and
our ability to question the evils being done in our
name. America today and the world tomorrow are a
manifestation of this truth.
Ignorance has replaced knowledge, resulting in power
running amok, incapable of being restrained, mutating
and growing, feeding off our inability to escape the
debacle currently gripping our collective mind.
The education system in America has been carefully
eroded over the course of time, altered in such a way
as to make creative and curious children barren and
submissive adults indifferent to the world around
them. The system now in place begins robbing a child’s
ability to think for himself or herself from the very
start of the education process. The class structure
itself eliminates individuality, personality and
energetic ability, as one teacher must educate many
students competing for attention. It is here when
talents that need to be discovered get ambushed
instead. Yet with a class structure that has endured
for decades, the child must become part of the whole,
learning from books laced with government and/or
In many school districts, mostly poor ones strapped
for cash, books can be dozens of years old, lacking
modern thought or progress. Many books are tools
created by entities with special interests that have
as a purpose the teaching of their ideology or the
furthering of their goals. The absurd teaching of
creationism is one such example. Many corporations now
create and donate books to school districts that
contain references and examples to their brand names
and product descriptions. Even in school children
cannot escape the growing omnipresence of the
corporate Leviathan which thirsts to program the
innocent the way it sees fit.
Indeed, the young mind is needlessly brainwashed with
a history of a nation that in many instances
contradicts and even subverts the true historical
reality of the United States. Only the ‘good’ that
America has fostered during its rapid and short rise
is taught, without ever dealing with the requisite bad
inherent in an Empire that has laid claim to land and
man during years of brutal conquest, both militarily
and economically. Glossing over national heroes,
mythifying them into deities and transforming them
into perfect human beings is the role of the school
book, brainwashing the young to a fictional perfection
when reality begs to differ. Yet humanity must be
balanced and its reality etched in stone so that
future generations learn the human condition as well
as its civilization.
The genocide of indigenous Americans is whitewashed;
the slavery of blacks that lasted hundreds of years,
oftentimes suffering barbaric treatment at the hands
of their white masters is easily covered up in a few
paragraphs, deceiving readers to the true horrors
their ancestors committed or suffered. The subservient
role women were placed under for centuries is hardly
mentioned, and the great civil rights movement that
helped change history for the better never gets the
coverage it deserves.
The war crimes and crimes against humanity America has
perpetrated worldwide to millions of anonymous people
under the rubric of freedom and democracy is never
mentioned, rather, they are sugarcoated and
glamorized, serving as examples of America’s ‘great
history.’ Also, the corrosive and damaging effects of
American capitalism disguised as democracy that has
condemned untold millions to the dustbins of history
is manipulated to look like a chivalrous attempt to
save lives and free nations.
Brainwashing unquestioned patriotism into our young
one’s minds government controlled education furthers
the squashing of dissent and the questioning of our
sovereign’s motives. We are conditioned that our
elected leaders are gods walking among men, to be
trusted and never to be questioned. Their intentions
are always noble, their reasoning pure. Dissent and
debate, protest and curiosity are seen not as
patriotic manifestations of an informed citizenry but
rather as an alien afterthought not worthy of
The ingraining of loyalty to flag and country, even
when committing evil worldwide, is to be allowed to
continue, eventually becoming the means by which the
state is allowed to declare war, economic genocide and
market colonialism, without so much as a whisper from
its constituency. The elite therefore bask in the glow
of the radiant bean called patriotic fervor,
indoctrinated from childhood, lasting until death.
Preaching the noble deeds yet hiding or disguising the
evil ingrained in empire building serves only to alter
history and manipulate the young, eroding our future
in the process. To understand humanity in past,
present and future an entire history must be taught,
both good and bad, thereby creating in our future
citizens the ability to grow wise to the mistakes of
times past in order to comprehend the ever-changing
and oftentimes complex conditions of the present. To
not teach the truth of what has come before is to
leave behind the keys to unlocking the door of the
human condition, essentially condemning our children
into repeating the errors that continue to bear
witness to unnecessary suffering, death, destruction,
violence and war.
The fruits of our past mistakes can be seen in our
history; the essence of the human condition lies
written for all to see. American education serves no
purpose if the result of its actions leads to a replay
of years gone by; it becomes an exercise in futility
when our future repeats the blunders of their
ancestors and the follies of those who once led.
Brainwash education is the means to an end, a device
that entraps rather than make free. It is a valuable
tool to exert hegemony over the populace. When begun
from the first years of youth, becoming attached and
most difficult to extract, brainwashing to suit the
state and the elite’s goals is a dangerous device.
When combined with the 9/11’s of history, it takes on
a life of its own, becoming a Molotov cocktail ready
to explode in seething rage. The system would not have
it any other way.
Made Ignorant to a World Beyond our Borders
American education makes no attempt to expose the
wonders of a world existing beyond its borders to its
children. The outside world and its plethora of
diverse people are hardly mentioned, easily summarized
in brief mentions of world history. The ignorance of
cultures, religions, ethnicities, nationalities and
beliefs that has ensued has made America a nation
neither curious to a grand spectrum of peoples nor
understanding to the vast complexities of an
ever-changing world. Failing to understand what exists
beyond our oceans, American children, through the
damaging effects of the nation’s dilapidated
educational system, become isolated from the world
community and the fraternity of peoples.
It is understanding the world and becoming part of it
that prevents the Iraq’s and Vietnam’s of history from
ever arising. It is knowledge of a world and its
people that creates peace and good-will. Ignorance, on
the other hand, fosters only exploitation,
indifference and arrogance. Iraq today is the result
of this failure in American education. Abu Ghraib and
its war crimes is the result of a system that
isolates, indoctrinates and makes ignorant to the
lives and realities of six billion people whose world
is larger than that of our own borders. The debacle in
Iraq is a manifestation of American ignorance to a
world and its diverse peoples; Iraq’s daily explosions
are testament to its failure to understand the people
it is occupying and the anger emanating from the
arrogance and ignorance of its soldiers.
The failure of American education to teach about a
world existing beyond the confines of its own grandeur
is exemplified today by an Iraq that is the catalyst
to a most dangerous era in American history. Societies
that are ignorant to the greater world around them
suffer a dereliction of humanity and the far reaching
implications their actions tend to unsettle. From the
actions of ignorance rise the reactions of those
America’s failure to educate its children to a world
beyond its shores, in a world coming closer together
is a travesty, and an error, especially for an Empire
whose grip is all-encompassing, its power circulating
around the globe. A leader of nations and an Empire
such as America must learn and understand the world it
dominates and the people it controls. For it to govern
wisely its citizens must be brought into the sphere of
a world community that is both heterogeneous and aware
of the dangers the Pax Americana is capable of
releasing. For it to avoid the wrath seen today its
ambassadors and representatives must be educated to
the songs of the world and the tunes of human
In order to prevent the never-before seen levels of
hatred, animosity and anger directed at the United
States and the blowback that is now being manifested
the American education system must open itself up to
the outside world. If it remains isolationist and
ignorant, preferring to enclose itself in the bubble
it continues to lock itself into, the karma we are
witnessing will be but the tip of the iceberg.
Ignorance leading to exploitation can only go so far;
a world beyond our borders exists, and must be taught,
learned and understood.
For if the Empire’s people fail to grasp the lands and
peoples beyond their borders, preferring instead to
live in the comfort of their own existence and the
ignorance of their upbringing a world that was never
known will be once more forgotten, and the blowback
birthed by our ancestors will be made that much more
difficult to comprehend.
Separate and Unequal
The purposeful inequality inherent in American
education is created by design, fostered by an elite
that manipulates in society a separation between rich
and working class. It is abundantly clear that
education systems in America are nowhere near to being
equal. On the contrary, their inequality stems from a
government and the elite that control it that seek to
maintain the status quo of preventing millions of
children from ever advancing beyond the caste they are
born into. Without opportunity, ability is wasted and
those capable of threatening the power structure as it
exists at present are left to rot in the cesspool
created by those social engineers sealing the destiny
of millions of Americans.
Maintaining separate and unequal education systems
assures the elite, government and corporations of
millions of exploitable slaves that through no fault
of their own are condemned to a life stuck in the
working class, living off low wages, surviving on a
day to day basis, uneducated and ignorant to the
exploitation they are subjected to. The millions that
fate has placed in corrosive school districts starving
for pennies from the government are subjected to an
education that is shameful at best and a crime against
humanity at worst. Unequal distribution of tax schemes
makes it impossible for children born into poor
neighborhoods from ever getting the education the few
elite children of privilege are guaranteed.
With rotting school districts that cannot afford good
teachers, books, buildings, administrators and a
semblance of hope children receive substandard
education levels that forever alter their ability to
learn and advance in society. When this is compounded
year after year the ramifications are severe, serving
to quash all ability and potential opportunity. It is
this level of education most American children, both
urban and rural, are subjected to, forced to endure
the worst inequality of teaching found in the
When the elite that run the nation are deciding
futures, however, this is to be expected. Their
corporations need low-class workers; their armies need
soldiers; their government needs slaves. By
maintaining separate and unequal education systems, in
essence two completely different systems, one reserved
for privilege, the other for future serfs, the elite
are assured of control, exploitation, power and
growing wealth, mostly at the hands of the slaves they
have created. The masses, having been trained from
birth to become the slaves of the nation’s
capitalists, are subjected to years of subservient
education mechanisms that encourage and indeed guide
us toward exploitation. The dreams and hopes of
childhood are thus eviscerated as the reality of the
environment and education we are born into collides
with once creative talents and utopian goals.
Born into environments offering the worst in American
education creates in the masses ignorance to the
plight our government is subjecting us to. We are made
unaware and become indifferent to the massive crime
being perpetrated by government officials who help
foster separate and unequal education and even
encourage it by their unwillingness to make right what
has been made wrong. The continued apathy of our
government to the vastly different levels of education
is proof that it is complicit in the manufacturing of
an entire class of slaves produced to be exploited by
the powerful few. To continue a system that is so
dastardly in its scope and so damaging to millions is
to acknowledge the purposeful disregard our government
has in alleviating a reality that in this nation at
least does not need to exist. It is shameful, it is
wrong, it is a crime.
An assembly line of slaves has been created, socially
engineered through years of manipulations and
exploitations, breeding ignorance, robbing
opportunity, erasing talent and harvesting entire
generations of worker bees. For America the beautiful
needs slaves to work and enrich the elite, it needs
soldiers to wage war in the name of capitalism, it
needs ignorance to continue its sovereignty and castes
from which to maintain the balance that has kept those
in power at the top for generations.
Separate and unequal, the secret ingredients to the
American juggernaut; separate and unequal, the oil
that assures the mighty engine of capitalism from ever
corroding and malfunctioning. Through the backs of the
masses the elite survive; through the exploitation of
the many the few thrive.
Leaving all Working and Middle Class Children Behind
The dumbing down of America continues its injurious
path through the policies of George Bush, who is
quietly decimating the talents and energies of the
nation’s youth. Wishing all children to become the
bumbling idiot that characterizes his existence, his
policies have washed away what remained of viable
education. The dumbing down of America has only picked
up its pace as children today are being deprived of
the tools necessary to think for themselves. Forced by
the government to teach to standardized tests, school
districts are erasing the arts and other important
classes from curriculum. Instead, teachers are being
forced to prepare their students to passing the test
that determines financial reward or punishment.
This form of education is leveling critical thinking,
analytical skills and free-thinking minds. It is
destroying education as we know it, along with the
futures of millions of children who are being made
automatons lacking a mind to question the world around
them. This sinister mechanism is purposefully being
implemented to dumb down American children. It is yet
another tool those in power are using to create a
nation devoid of free thought.
Teaching to the test entails sacrificing all subject
matter not included in the test itself. As a result,
vital tools such as music, art, languages, social
sciences, philosophy, health and other liberal arts
are being ignored, thrown away into dark closets of
indifference. Worthy teachers now have their hands
tied down, unable to bring out the blossoms of talent
from their students. Instead, they must partake in the
manipulation of America’s children, becoming the
instructors to a new generation of students those in
power want desperately to transform into unthinking
sentinels easily manipulated and controlled.
America’s teachers, already underpaid and under
funded, battling a system eager to destroy youth, must
now see the seeds they sow become homogenous crops
succumbing to ignorance, eroding all semblance of
individuality and wasting away once fruitful and
talented lives. All children are being left behind,
and American society will pay the ultimate and most
Fostering Ignorance, Creating Sheep, Cementing Decline
Children are brainwashed at a very early age to follow
the dictates of the state, to become the obedient
drones the state needs in order to survive. Curriculum
programs prevent the free-thinking mind from ever
emerging even as such paramount subject matter such as
art, foreign language, music and philosophy are being
eliminated or never implemented. It is at a very early
age when these classes can make a such a vital
difference in children, in essence granting an
enormous head start towards a long lasting, happy
life. It is at early youth that the human brain
absorbs everything that is taught, it is at this stage
in development when positive and all-inclusive
education bears fruit. Yet American children, living
in the wealthiest nation on the planet, are being
denied the essential tools needed for human progress
to move forward, individuals to prosper and for a
nation to thrive.
Becoming an exercise in futility, education has become
a weapon to militarize millions of children to the
tune of the government, robbing them of the
free-thinking and analytical mind whose questioning of
government and individual thought the elite want
eliminated. In today’s America, no child must be
allowed to think or understand what is being done to
them and the society they inhabit. Every child being
taught must march in lock-step with millions more,
becoming benign drones made ignorant to a process
robbing them of their existence, neither challenging
those in power or absorbing the ingredients necessary
to develop a mind that may one day become the ultimate
weapon for freedom and salvation.
As in all state systems, in order to have subservient
citizens, the young must be programmed early on to the
dictates of those in power. In America, these entities
are the elite capitalists that have transformed
democracy into corporatism. Entire generations of
people have become an enormous herd of sheep, unaware
of the slavery that grips them and the exploitation
that befalls every waking hour. The corporatist state
has accomplished the ignorance of its citizens, now
ruling unobstructed and unaccountable, free to unleash
wave after wave of crimes, both upon those it rules
and those it conquers.
The majority of the American people now fail to
question authority, debate policy, seek accountability
or demand answers. Indifferent we have become to the
dangerous ways of our government or to our own plight.
Every generation has seen its ability to understand,
question and analyze dwindle with each subsequent
decade that passes. Soon the day will arrive when
complete drones our descendants become, completely
subservient to the will of the rulers, shackled in
chains of ignorance, transformed into exploitable
energies deficient of free-thinking minds.
The only vestige of freedom left is that of the mind,
a realm never before touched by the claws of the state
and the powerful. Yet this freedom is disappearing,
for the state has found a way to annihilate a freedom
once thought untouchable. Free-thought is fading fast
from an American psyche that once espoused the belief
in the power of the individual. In its wake lie
hundreds of millions of energies whose minds have been
captured in a war we failed to realize we were being
subjected to. Free-thinking minds are being made
extinct, suffering from years of social engineering
and artificial conditioning.
More and more we are failing to understand what is
being done to us and our children. With each passing
day the corporate Leviathan absorbs more of our
collective brain, inculcating us with garbage,
conditioning us to its version of what American
society should be. The wretched symptoms of capitalism
are devouring our very existence, making us the
sheeple the system feeds off of. We are being herded
to the slaughterhouse, ready to be gutted and mass
produced, sold to the hungry wolves and vultures
concomitantly ready to feast off our once vibrant
Tell the Children the Truth
The time has come to tell the children the truth. The
time has come to tell them that most are condemned to
castes, unable to escape, destined to be exploited,
destined for modern man’s version of slavery. The time
has come to tell the children of privilege that they
are being trained to become the exploiters of the
masses, becoming condoners of subservience,
inequality, injustice, corruption and thievery.
We must awaken from this lethargy catapulting us into
a future missing freedom and individuality, happiness
and a worthy existence. The dumbing down of America
cannot be allowed to continue, for if it does, George
Bush’s vision will become George Orwell’s reality. It
is time to tell the children the truth. It is time to
liberate ourselves from a system that is making us all
automatons. Freedom of thought, freedom of mind and
freedom to live are our goals. The elimination of the
virus inflicting ignorance and enslavement upon us and
our children should be our mission.
The time to retake the American mind is upon us, and
this starts with telling our children the truth of
what our indifference, subservience and inability to
act is condemning them to. For knowledge is power, the
kryptonite that weakens the energy leading us to
nothingness. They know this, which is why the dumbing
down of America is taking place. Knowledge is a threat
to their existence and continued control, which is why
they want it destroyed. Education is liberation,
something they want desperately to avoid. An
enlightened populace is their nightmare; an ignorant
citizenry their wet dream.
It is through the awakening of the masses that
mountains are moved and canyons crossed. It is through
the slumber of the masses that evil awakens. It is
through our collective energy that those in power have
no future and no place left to hide. The future of
America is in our hands: either the dumbing down
continues or the awakening commences.
October 11, 2006 Manuel Valenzuela is a social critic,
commentator, Internet columnist and author of Echoes
in the Wind, a novel now published by
http://www.Authorhouse.com His articles appear
regularly at various alternative news websites from
around the globe. Mr. Valenzuela welcomes comments and
can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. He
encourages readers to surf the collection of the over
100 essays he has written which can be found visiting
his web site http://valenzuelasveritas.blogspot.com/
and by searching the Internet. His next book, Beyond
the Smoking Mirror: Reflections on America and
Humanity, a collection of his essays, will be
published in early 2007.
ANONYMITY OF SOCIAL WORKERS 20 October 2006
Blind justice without a name
If social workers really are manufacturing evidence in
child abuse cases, their anonymity is assured
THIS WEEK Tim and Gina Williams, a Welsh couple, were
reunited with their three children. Social workers had
whisked them into care two years ago in the wholly
erroneous belief that Mr Williams was a paedophile. He
had made the fatal mistake of calling social services
about an 11-year-old boy he had found half-naked with
his daughter. But the tables quickly turned. A doctor
claimed to have found evidence of sexual abuse, social
workers jumped to conclusions, and the Williamses were
prevented from seeing their children except for an
hour and a half twice a week. They said that their
children never understood what was happening. They
thought their parents did not want them. Imagine it,
The Williamses were saved because an American doctor
testified that there was not a shred of evidence of
abuse. In a searing judgment, Judge Crispin Masterman
has ruled that the children should never have been
removed. He criticised social workers for failing to
follow the most basic procedures. Yet the doctor and
the social workers remain anonymous.
Newport City Council, named as the local authority,
has promised a review. This is unusual. In many such
cases, even local councillors do not know when their
own staff perpetrate miscarriages of justice. In March
Mr Justice McFarlane publicly castigated social
workers who had removed a nine-year-old girl from her
parents for 14 months on the absolutely false pretext
that her mother might be suffering from Munchausen’s
syndrome by proxy (MSbP). The judge found that every
one of the 13 assertions made by the social services
team leader was “misleading or incomplete or wrong”.
But guess what? We will never know who the team leader
is. The Tory MP and ex-council leader Sir Paul
Beresford, who has called for those involved to be
named, has been unable even to find out which local
authority was involved. I have a good idea which one
it is. But I am willing to bet that even the leader of
that council does not know. I am also willing to bet
that none of the people involved has even been
This is a racket. All other public servants are held
accountable for their mistakes. John Hemming, the
Liberal Democrat MP, puts it this way: “In a criminal
case, where someone can be given a life sentence,
police officers are quoted by name as they give
evidence. There is no justification for professionals
being anonymous when a parent is given an effective
life sentence [by losing their child].”
If we do not know their identities, we also cannot
tell whether the same people have given misleading
evidence in other cases. If the McFarlane case social
workers thought they saw MSbP in a woman whose only
crime was to have taken her daughter to hospital for
stomach pain (I kid you not), how many other times
were they visited by similarly delusional visions?
Did Gordon Oliver, the social worker recently jailed
for sexually assaulting children over a period of 20
years, ever give evidence in court? What about Martin
Thei, the Essex County Council worker who killed
himself five years ago after being arrested by police
for downloading child porn? One campaign group claims
that Thei made many reports that resulted in children
being taken into care and/or adopted. The council says
that is unlikely but it is not absolutely sure. I have
talked to one family in whose case Thei’s report was
crucial. This has never been reviewed.
The number of calls I receive from parents, some who
have lost their children for ever and some who have
got them back after dreadful battles, makes me
increasingly concerned that social workers and experts
are manufacturing evidence; that they are concentrated
in certain parts of the country; and that they cover
up for each other, because they are convinced that
they are right. We are living in a hell of good
intentions. We can only root out the bad apples if we
can see how they infect the picture.
Anonymity clouds every attempt at justice. Two years
ago, after Angela Cannings was cleared of killing her
babies, Margaret Hodge, then Children’s Minister,
announced a review of certain cases where children had
been taken into care. But her “review” consisted of
asking the same old people in the same old local
authorities to question their own original judgments.
Only one case was subsequently overturned. That tells
us nothing, because Hodge failed utterly to grasp the
opportunity to monitor specific councils and witnesses
and to see whether there were patterns to their
Today, once again, we are in danger of missing an
opportunity. For the Government’s otherwise excellent
consultation on opening up the family courts barely
touches on this issue. It concentrates on the
anonymity of children and families, and says virtually
nothing about the anonymity of professionals. Making
more judgments public, as the Government proposes,
would clearly be a great step forward. But if we
simply get anonymised judgments, such as that of
McFarlane, we are not much farther forward in holding
fraudsters to account.
Judges currently decide whether to make their
judgments public, and whether to name professionals.
Very few do, despite guidance from the Court of Appeal
(in the McFarlane case, the court even kept secret the
identity of the defence counsel). I have no desire to
perpetrate witch-hunts: each witness could be given an
identity code, if that was felt absolutely necessary
to protect their identities, but that would at least
enable those of us who want to see justice done track
The debate about child protection and anonymity is
always couched in terms of the interests of the child.
Those who work in this field have come to believe that
a child’s privacy is somehow synonymous with their
own. But if some people do not understand what real
evidence is, should they not be accountable? The
oldest law of bureaucracies is “first protect
ourselves”. How many more cases do there have to be
before someone finally kicks down their hiding place?
GOLDDIGGERS CHARTER HELPS FUND THE TREASURY 20 October 2006
THIS CASE MORE THAN ANY OTHER SHOWS HOW CORRUPT
BRITAINS DIVORCE INDUSTRY HAS BECOME THANKS TO
GOLDDIGGERS LIKE HEATHER MILLS.
Any man who thinks a British marriage certificate ensures his interests
should realise it is a licence for golddiggers to help fund the whole
legal system in the UK.
From judges,law lords,lawyers and now the treasury.
Chancellor's slice of McCartney divorce cash
IF THERE were two people in the marriage of Sir Paul
McCartney and Heather Mills, a third person has
entered the divorce. Gordon Brown, as the head of the
Treasury, could benefit by £32.5 million, according to
a tax expert.
While the Chancellor of the Exchequer is wrestling for
the keys of No10, Her Majesty's Treasury is preparing
for a cash windfall accrued from the tax collected on
a sale of Sir Paul's property and other assets. The
former Beatle is expected to proceed with the sale in
order to generate the £200 million cash settlement
sought by his estranged wife.
According to Mike Truman, a tax expert with
LexisNexis, an information provider to the accounting
and legal profession, the Chancellor could expect to
receive as much as £32.5 million in Capital Gains Tax
(CGT), the tax on the profits generated by the sale of
property and possessions.
Mr Truman said: "Sir Paul's fortune currently stands
at an estimated £825 million, according to the Sunday
Times Rich List, and if Heather Mills is awarded £200
million, Gordon Brown looks set to receive
approximately £32.5 million through CGT - not a bad
"The level of the settlement will be significant in
determining the Treasury's cut. The £30 million, which
was reportedly offered and turned down by Mills, is
little more than the estimated increase in McCartney's
wealth during 2005, which reportedly went up from £800
million to £825 million. As a result, commentators are
now suggesting that Mills could receive around £200
Mr Truman has calculated that if Heather Mills is
awarded the full sum of £200 million, then Sir Paul
McCartney will most likely raise the money from cash,
investments and the sale of property and artwork, as
well as possibly from a dividend paid out from his
company, MPL Communications.
In an evaluation of how the McCartney millions are
made up, Mr Truman said: "Sir Paul McCartney's total
worth is put at £825 million by the Sunday Times Rich
List - but even this is a cautious estimate. The
increase of £25 million from last year comes from the
nearly £50 million which Billboard estimates he
grossed in 2005."
Sir Paul, 64, is reported to have offered Heather £30
million following the end of the couple's four-year
At first the pair insisted the break-up would be
amicable for their dauighter's sake. However, their
relationship has become increasingly acrimonious, with
Ms Mills, 38, hiring Anthony Julius, the lawyer who
represented Diana, Princess of Wales, in her divorce,
while Sir Paul is retaining Fiona Shackleton, who
acted for Prince Charles.
Last night, a spokesman for Anthony Julius's law firm,
Mishcon de Reya, said: "Unfortunately due to client
confidentiality, he's not in a position to comment."
A spokesman for the Treasury also said: "We cannot
talk about specific cases."
Gay police advert breached rules 18 October 2006
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDAS ARE UNDERMINING HETEROSEXUAL RIGHTS PARTICULARLY IN MARRIAGE.
The higher than average percentage of lesbians and gays in Social services seriously affects decisions when heterosexual couples split undermining male parenting rights.
Also the higher than average number of gays in the judiciary and who are lawyers undermines heterosexual MALES in divorce.
The UK is operating a CHILD THEFT RACKET taking children from heterosexual parents to feed the perversions of those who control the legal systems in the UK and to provide gays with vulnerable children.Children made vulnerable by legal racketeering.
The Dunblane massacre was used to cover up HIGH PROFILE legal figures who were taking children away at weekends from Queen Victoria School.Children who where boarding there because their parents work overseas for the armed forces.
The anti heterosexual male media also have a much higher than average number of gays working within it and why the NEWS is so distorted against heterosexual males particularly when they discuss the MULTI BILLION POUND divorce industry,
This allows the re distribution of heterosexual assets to fund all other groups while undermining heterosexual males rights.
THERE IS A SINISTER NETWORK OF EVIL DEVIL WORSHIPPING MONSTERS WHO CONTROL MUCH OF THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS IN THE UK USING BLACKMAIL OF PERVERSIONS TO KEEP CONTROL OF THIS BIZARRE SYSTEM.
Gay police advert breached rules
A Gay Police Association (GPA) advert which linked a rise in homophobic attacks to religious belief breached advertising rules.
The advert showing a Bible and a pool of blood led to 553 complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).
The watchdog said there was an implication, without evidence, that Christians were the main cause of homophobic incidents.
The GPA said the press campaign was meant to be thought provoking.
Christian Watch, the Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches and the Trinitarian Bible Society found the advert "offensive and derogatory".
Others complained the image of blood misleadingly implied all incidents were violent and questioned whether the GPA could prove that religious beliefs had caused the rise in homophobic crimes.
The advert appeared in the Diversity supplement of the Independent newspaper on 29 June, two days ahead of the Europride gay and lesbian parade in London.
It stated: "In the last 12 months, the GPA has recorded a 74% increase in homophobic incidents, where the sole or primary motivating factor was the religious belief of the perpetrator."
An ASA spokeswoman said: "This is our most complained about campaign advert of the year so far. People thought it was portraying Christians in a bad light."
The GPA said the majority of the 250 calls relating to homophobic incidents its helpline received in the year up to March 2006 were "weighted against Christianity" while 25 referred to Islam.
The GPA was formed in 1990 and has members in all 52 UK police forces.
RESEARCHERS checking your bins 17 October 2006
RESEARCHERS aided by Council and police search through
rubbish bins to help PREVENT identity fraud.
Maybe coming down your street next?
Waste bins 'an ID theft goldmine'
Householders are still throwing out too many documents
that help criminals steal their identity a survey
To help solve the problem police and other consumer
organisations have launched their second national
identity fraud prevention week.
A bin-raiding test in London found nearly half of the
120 tested homes had thrown away enough information
for their identity to be stolen.
The government has estimated that ID fraud cost the UK
£1.7bn last year.
According to CIFAS, the UK's fraud prevention service,
identity theft has risen more than five-fold from
20,000 cases in 1999 to 137,000 in 2005.
But experts have suggested that the true figure of ID
fraud cases is in fact far higher.
HOW TO AVOID ID THEFT
Do not use your mother's maiden name or place of birth
as a security password
Check your credit record annually
If you move, make sure you let your bank know
Shred or rip-up post before throwing it in the bin
Never use the same password for all your accounts
Do not carry address details in your wallet
The bin-raiding experiment - backed by the
Metropolitan Police, Crimestoppers, UK fraud
prevention service Cifas and several credit rating
agencies - was carried out in four streets in the
London borough of Wandsworth.
Researchers, helped by the council, rifled through the
rubbish and re-cycling boxes thrown out by the
The results gave a hint at the ease with which
criminals might be able to steal valuable data.
Credit and debit card numbers had been thrown away in
their rubbish by 30% of the 120 homes, the researchers
Documents containing bank account numbers and sort
codes had been thrown away by 46% of those whose
rubbish was investigated.
And 73% had thrown out paper showing their exact
signature on a credit or debit card, the report said.
Such a small sample is not representative, either
geographically or demographically, of the wider UK
But the government believes this sort of carelessness
is one reason why identity fraud has been a growing
problem in the last few years.
Fast growing crime
"Identity fraud is costing the UK billions of pounds a
year, and is one of Britain's fastest growing crimes,"
said Nigel Evans, MP for Ribble Valley and chair of
the all party group on identity fraud. "Yet people are
still not doing enough to protect themselves.
Throwing away your personal details is as good as
advertising them in the local paper.
Nigel Evans MP
"Throwing away your personal details is as good as
advertising them in the local paper. We are making it
far too easy for the identity thieves," he added.
Professor Martin Gill, an expert on ID fraud from the
University of Leicester, told the BBC's Five Live that
shredding bills was not enough.
He said he had spoken to offenders who took such
things as bank statements and utility bills during
"Bag snatches and pick-pockets is another way they get
information, so you've really got to be careful across
"Computing and the internet has its own little
dangers, so we've got to make sure we pay attention
there. And here is the problem with this. There are
lots of ways offenders get information - and we really
need to be aware of them and not make it easy."
Campaigners have been calling for ID theft to be made
a criminal offence in the UK, at present only using a
stolen identity to obtain goods and services by
deception is outlawed.
In the USA, which faced an upsurge in ID theft earlier
than the UK, stealing someone's identity is now an
One reason for the stiff penalties is that in the US
the problem of ID theft can be exacerbated by the use
of social security numbers.
The wide use of social security numbers can mean that
an individual's identity can be thoroughly compromised
by criminals, analysts said.
And in some extreme cases, according to CIFAS, victims
have had to declare themselves legally dead to resolve
the situation, a phenomena known as 'pseudocide'.
Whispering campaign against general and Iraq war 17 October 2006
The fascist UK state under HEIR BLAIR
Whispering campaign against General who spoke up
Sir Richard Dannatt gave a blunt assessment of the
Britain's top General was the subject of a vicious
Whitehall whispering campaign yesterday as Labour
ministers furious at his devastating outburst over
Iraq called for him to be sacked.
Despite Tony Blair being forced to back General Sir
Richard Dannatt publicly on Friday over his blunt
assessment of Britain's mission in Iraq, there were
growing fears that the head of the Army could yet fall
victim to a political backlash.
In behind-the-scenes briefings yesterday senior
ministers claimed the General should be dismissed.
They condemned his explosive public statements as a
'mistake' which must not be allowed to happen again.
However opinion polls revealed the political risks
facing the Government as three quarters of the public
said they agreed with Sir Richard and that he should
keep his job.
Downing Street was left seething by the senior
commander's explosive interview in Friday's Daily
Mail, in which the Chief of the General Staff warned
that UK troops in Iraq were 'exacerbating the security
problems' facing Britain around the world, and must
leave 'soon' - driving a coach and horses through Tony
Blair's foreign policy.
He condemned planning for the post-war occupation as
'poor', and claimed hopes of creating a liberal
democracy in Iraq were 'naive.' Within hours he gave a
series of broadcast interviews, prompted by a
late-night phone call from Defence Secretary Des
But rather than apologising he went even further,
warning of the risk that the Iraq mission could
'break' the Army. The Prime Minister appeared
wrong-footed and outmanoeuvred, and faced with an
overwhelming wave of support for Sir Richard from MPs
and the armed forces.
Mr Blair was reduced to playing down the schism,
agreeing with the General's more palatable comments
while trying to ignore the most explosive.
But yesterday brought the first signs of a serious
Government backlash, raising grave questions about Sir
One Cabinet minister speaking anonymously to a Sunday
newspaper said: 'He should be sacked. His comments
were utterly unacceptable for someone in his
Another minister said: 'Dannatt was an accident
waiting to happen. He should not be allowed to make
'How can we expect our troops to risk their lives in
Iraq when their commanding officer is questioning
their presence there?'
Former cabinet minister David Blunkett, who remains
close to Mr Blair, criticised Sir Richard for 'trying
to introduce a new constitutional element' by
'interfering' with the Government's decisions, rather
than simply carrying them out.
Another Government source said of Sir Richard: 'It is
not his job to criticise Government policy. He needs
to get back in his box and shut up. His next mistake
will be his last.'
The hostile comments raise real doubts over whether
Sir Richard's working relationship with the Government
can be patched up. His post as head of the Army has no
official time limit. His predecessor General Sir Mike
Jackson served for three-and-a-half years, whereas
Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, overall head of UK armed
forces during the 2003 Iraq invasion, quit after
barely two years following a series of run-ins with
Army insiders now fear Sir Richard's position could
become impossible even sooner. There was more measured
criticism from some opposition figures yesterday who
claimed the General had overstepped the constitutional
Former Liberal Democrat leader and ex-soldier Paddy
Ashdown said: 'He may be accurate in what he said, he
may be cheered to the echo in the Army, but he
certainly shouldn't have said it.
'It's a clear constitutional breach. It opens up a
massive division between him and the Government.'
He said military chiefs who opposes Government policy
should resign rather than 'blurt out' their
Former Tory foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind
suggested Sir Richard would receive a 'two strikes'
warning, adding: 'What he said was right, but it's not
for a general any more than it is for a civil servant
to express what are in fact political views.'
He told GMTV's Sunday Programme: 'Serving officers are
not, I'm afraid, able to have that kind of freedom.'
Meanwhile in Iraq itself senior officials agreed that
British troops should leave sooner rather than later.
A spokesman for the governor Basra Mohammed al Wail
said: 'It's true they saved us from Saddam Hussein,
but that war is over. We believe their continuing
presence makes the security situation worse.'
In Afghanistan there were growing signs of the
shortages Sir Richard referred to, as officials
admitted the MOD was looking to charter civilian
helicopters to ease the strain on the force of just
eight Chinook transport helicopters currently trying
to support 5,600 British soldiers on the ground.
In theory the
civilian aircraft would be used for
routine supply movements and kept away from the
'frontline', although in reality aircraft face risk of
attack virtually anywhere in Afghanistan.
Blunkett said he didn’t care about lives. Prisoners
should be 'machine-gunned' 17 October 2006
WELL BEFORE the 2001 general election, senior
officials at the Home Office were aware that David
Blunkett was to be Jack Straw’s replacement. I
regretted Jack’s departure; he had been an
exceptionally supportive Home Secretary, genuinely
interested in rehabilitation. After appointing me as
Director-General of the Prison Service in 1998, he had
obtained very significant new funding and allowed me
dramatically to increase drug treatment and education
But, nevertheless, along with the rest of the senior
team at the Home Office, I welcomed David’s
appointment and anticipated a smooth handover. That
was to prove to be optimistic. David’s suspicion of
senior officials was immediately apparent and the
relationship between ministers (and their special
advisers) and officials swiftly declined. I learnt,
and quickly, that David was dismissive of anything
that might have been achieved at the Home Office
before his arrival.
Over time, things improved, not least because John
Gieve, the Permanent Secretary, replaced almost the
whole of his senior team. Of those there when David
arrived in 2001, I was to be the only survivor two
years later. But despite that, my relationship with
David was not good and although it improved toward the
end of his time at the Home Office, I found him always
to be unpredictable and inclined to rush to a
decision, sometimes on the basis of what had been read
to him that morning from the tabloid press. And when
under pressure, he could be almost impossible to work
with. But it was not until he was tested with his only
prison riot that I concluded that he was not up to the
David’s diary account of the riot at Lincoln in
October 2002 is fascinating. It was clearly not
written at the time because he refers to me as being
in overall charge of corrections (prisons and
probation), a position not invented at the time of the
riot and one I was not to take up until 2003. So his
version of what happened that night might owe
something to a bit of post-event rationalisation. But
whatever the reason, David insists that I dithered
over the riot, and had he not been Home Secretary, the
riot might have spread to other prisons. His immodest
summary was that it was his grasp of history and his
memory of the Strangeways riot of 1989 that was the
significant factor on resolving the crisis at Lincoln.
My account of that night is somewhat different. I did
not keep a diary while running prisons, but I was
sufficiently disturbed by David’s behaviour during the
crisis to take notes at the time.
I was on the Isle of Wight, about to begin a series of
visits to the three prisons there. As was my habit on
the evening before such visits, and along with Roy
Webster, my staff and press officer, I took the three
prison governors to dinner. While the five of us were
enjoying a curry in Cowes, Phil Wheatley (now the
director-general of prisons but then my deputy) phoned
me to tell me that there was a serious disturbance at
Lincoln and that staff had had to retreat from the
prison. We agreed that he would take personal charge
of the incident, I would return to London and that
staff already manning the incident room in Prison
Service headquarters would tell ministers.
Riots had been almost commonplace in the Eighties and
Nineties. This was the first since my appointment and
the only significant disturbance during my seven years
running prisons. It was the only big crisis in prisons
with which David had to deal, notorious escapes also
being a thing of the past. Had David possessed a real
grasp of history, that good fortune would have been
uppermost in his mind.
Although this was the first riot we had faced for some
years, we had well-tested contingency arrangements in
place. And I was comforted first by the fact that Phil
— hugely able in a crisis — was on his way to take
command of the incident room and, secondly, that I
knew Dick Peacock, the governor of Lincoln, to be able
I was about to leave the restaurant when I got a call
from Kath Raymond, David’s political adviser. I
thought that this would be to convey a message of
support from the Home Secretary. Instead, a flustered
Kath told me that the Home Secretary was furious and
said I was to call him at home.
David was certainly furious. He was also hysterical.
He directed me, without delay, to order staff back
into the prison. I told him that we did not, at that
time, have enough staff in the prison to contemplate
such a move but that many more staff were on their way
from other prisons. I insisted, however, that although
I was determined to take the prison back as quickly as
possible, I could not, and would not, risk staff or
prisoner lives in attempting to do so. He shrieked at
me that he didn’t care about lives, told me to call in
the Army and “machine-gun” the prisoners. He then
ordered me to take the prison back immediately. I
refused. David hung up.
I do not pretend not to have been flustered by this
outburst, which he surely cannot have intended us to
take seriously, but I attempted to remain calm, not
least because I was still at the restaurant table and
my staff had heard most of the exchange. One, now the
governor of one of Britain’s biggest jails, and
clearly deeply shocked, said simply: “Did he really
say he didn’t care about lives . . .?” Minutes later,
Jonathan Sedgwick, David’s private secretary, phoned
me and, more diplomatically, repeated that the Home
Secretary wanted me to order staff back into the
prison immediately. I told Jonathan I would not do so,
acknowledged that I was ignoring a direct order from
the Secretary Of State and said that I understood that
I might have to resign the next morning. I travelled
back to London convinced that I was in the last few
hours of my director-generalship.
I was buoyed, however, by a typically warm and
supportive call from John Gieve, who promised to do
all he could to handle David and told me that I had to
follow my professional judgment and agreed, without
hesitation, that the preservation of life had to be
the first priority.
In fact the contingency arrangements we had in place
worked well. Staff arrived in large numbers and as
quickly as the remote location of Lincoln allowed.
And, anxious to protect the lives of vulnerable
prisoners, who we thought might be attacked by those
rioting, Wheatley and Peacock had the prison back
under control before dawn.
David phoned me about seven in the morning — by which
time I was leaving London to travel to Lincoln to
thank the staff, something David should have done with
me — and warmly congratulated me on bringing the
disturbance to an end. The hysteria of the previous
evening and my ignoring his order was forgotten.
Other than recording the events, privately, to John
Gieve I have never before made this sad episode
public. But I cannot allow David’s version of events
to go unchallenged. Too many people worked tirelessly
and courageously that night to bring events at Lincoln
to a swift and relatively peaceful conclusion. David’s
was the only performance that was wanting.
Martin Narey was Permanent Secretary at the Home
Office and Director-General of the Prison Service.
Fictional speech in the House of Lords on Crown and
Judicial Immunity 17 October 2006
Fiction... A speech in the House of Lords on Crown and
by Christopher Wingate email@example.com
Lord Wingate of Arklow
My Lords, people have spoken elegantly and eloquently
about all of the difficulties that exist in the
present proposals before us.
I had proposed to address your Lordships on the
detailed document, but I start a long way down the
line accepting a fait accompli. That fait accompli is
that time is now upon us when we must accept the
fiduciary obligations that go with our positions of
power in both the House of Lords and the Parliament.
The orders before us are;
The removal of Crown and Judicial Immunity.
The creation of a constitutional jury in our highest
That all judgements be interim until submissions by
parties concerned is considered.
I shall still make a few short points but my most
useful contribution will be telling the truth.
My Lords, liberty cannot be preserved without a
general knowledge among the people, who have a right
and a desire for information; but besides this, they
have a right, an indisputable, unalienable,
indefeasible and divine right to that most dreaded and
envied kind of knowledge, by that I mean of the
characters and conduct of their rulers. Those of you
here, who profess to favour freedom, yet deprecate
agitation, are men who want crops without ploughing up
My Lords the issue we face today is not a monopoly of
the House of Lords; but rather a character and nature
of power itself, the abuse of power the possession
that power too often brings. We have had the power to
heal and power to harm and those decisions have been
carried out with immunity. Inevitably that time was to
one day end, that day is now upon us.
As soon as you put people together, even great people
like us, they somehow sink, cooperatively, below the
level required to successfully manage a nation.
Parents on a school committee, or people of parliament
are the same; their virtues vanish, their vices and
bias pop out, all reinforced by the self-confidence
which the power of numbers and position brings.
Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's
thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. The rights
of liberty, of all individual rights, are the dread of
tyrants. It is the right which tyrants first strike
down because they know its power. Thrones, dominions,
principalities, and powers, operating with injustice,
immunity and wrong, are sure to tremble when people
are allowed to reason. There can be no right of speech
where any man is compelled to suppress his honest
sentiments. Equally clear is the right to hear those
honest sentiments. To suppress free speech is a double
wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as
those of the speaker. And my Lords with all of our
speeches spoken elegantly and eloquently we have too
often forgotten to hear others not afforded our
We have heard analogies regarding the delivery of
services that with interference we could easily move
from that of independent law to selling cans of beans;
suggesting we live in dangerous times. Intemperate
speech is a distinctive characteristic of man.
Hotheads blow off and release destructive energy in
the process, but they know they have been heard. They
shout and rave, exaggerating weaknesses, magnifying
error, viewing with alarm. So it has been from the
beginning; and so it will be throughout time. The
framers of the American constitution knew human nature
as well as we all do. They too had lived in dangerous
times; they too knew the suffocating influence of
orthodoxy and standardised thought. They weighed the
compulsions for the restrained speech and thought
against the abuses of liberty but, they chose liberty.
But what have our democracies gained by their boasted
freedom of the press and parliament except the liberty
to abuse each other. My Lords for hundreds of years we
have retrained ourselves with dignity choosing words
that suit each other. Yet in that process we have
lost the ability to hear the expressions of the people
who suffer under this vertical tower of democracy.
In this house I occasionally hear talk about the good
old days when things were innocent and nobility
reigned and evil was obvious to be fought by all good
people. There never was such a world as anyone who
truly remembers what life was like on the farm or in
the city before these times. Our world then was
unsettled, just as it is unsettled now. That my Lords,
is the nature of our world.
A striking point raised by my noble and gallant friend
Lord Vinnieroe, is that the independence of the
judiciary is at stake suggesting the Government—the
executive—and the people, will keep their hand in our
pie; not even a finger, a whole hand. My Lords men are
never so likely to settle a question rightly as when
they discuss it freely. And to do so requires more
than a hand in the pie. Judges are required to sign a
judicial oath; an undertaking for impartiality and
fiduciary responsibilities. Yet judicial immunity will
prevent anyone from testing the undertakings promised
in the oath. Under normal law we all know that is an
When our people seek politicians help with a judicial
problem they discover politicians are gagged by
separation of power. When people seek help from the
judiciary they get a bill. But when people ask us to
help with a judicial wrong they get silence. The
difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is
that in a democracy you vote first and take orders
later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your
Let our people read whatever they want and let’s talk
about it with them. If we as leaders and people can
talk together, neither has much to fear. I go so far
as to say state secrets should not be secret. Too much
hidden agenda has occurred which is getting out of
control. If reports of plans of terror are made public
we are all informed. A country a leader a church or
mosque planning to harm us is in no better position to
do harm if we are aware of their intentions.
Only those who risk going too far can possibly find
out how far one can go. Freedom is not worth having if
it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. The
cost of liberty is less than the price of repression
and the public good is nothing more than being
interested in the protection of every individual's
private rights. My Lords we have served our people
with both good and bad decisions. Allowing analysis of
those decisions can only result in an improvement of
our service to our nation. I fear consistency of
tradition may cause us all in power to be as ignorant
today as we were a year ago.
We now witness political mismanagement being meet with
judicial activism. The growth of alarming intrusions
by the judiciary into the realm of policy is blurring
the integrity of the independent legislators and at
the same time destroying the foundations of stare
Before us today is not a proposal, but a demand we be
accountable. Since this accountability campaign began
by new and existing members of the Labour party, we
have all witnessed that campaign spread throughout all
the political parties in the United Kingdom. My Lords,
the people have spoken, crown and judicial immunity is
dead. Lord Alydar said it has been put that each year
the law society membership gains a bigger bite from
our gross domestic product with no end in sight.
Legislation designed to protect society appears to
enrich another; the lawyers.
My Lords in conclusion we may wish to err on the side
of tradition; or we can adopt the suggestion this
development today is the rebirth of equity. Equity
during the early days of the Statute of Westminster
was born from repeated reactions to judicial injustice
and provided remedies in situations in which precedent
or statutory law might not apply or be equitable. And
for several hundred years the independent chancery
stood alone to meet that task up until The Judicature
Act of 1873. Today we have an opportunity to once
again give equity a new life.
I recommend judicial and political accountability for
the management of not just our country, but all
countries be introduced and I cannot think of a more
noble and appropriate house than this The House of
Lords to begin that process.
ILLUMINATI UNDER ANOTHER NAME 15 October 2006
CHATHAM HOUSE REBRAND
From Wednesday 1st September 2004 The Royal Institute of International Affairs is now referred to as Chatham House on printed literature and in the media.
Our new logo and web address (www.chathamhouse.org.uk) reflect this change. Visitors to the website will automatically be rerouted from the old web address.
UK'S ESTABLISHMENT CRIMINALS 13 October 2006
IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
Working Against all the Odds!!
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
13 October 2006
FAO: Nick Hardwick and Gavin Forward
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
90 High Holborn
Tel: 020 7166 3201
Dear Gavin Forward and Nick Hardwick,
Re: DI Pickford and South Harrow Police failing in their duty to prosecute known criminals
As Amanda Costello has indicated in her correspondence below, that Gavin Forward is now my caseworker; therefore, I am enclosing the following incontrovertible evidence that DI Pickford and South Harrow Police are abusing public office and failing in their duty to prosecute the known criminals that framed me up and robbed me of my home and possessions, which is a criminal offence in law:
1. Important: Due to the fact that there is a conspiratorial “Memorandum of Understanding between the Association of Chief Police Officers of England and Wales and the Law Society, which ensures that anyone who have been targeted and robbed by HM Partnership, will find it impossible to find a lawyer to secure an effective remedy in the UK. Mr. Forward, this lawyer-less situation that I find myself maliciously shackled in for over 18 years, having been robbed of my home and possessions; is a serious criminal violation of my human rights under Article 6(3c) by the UK High Contracting Party, which you will be fully aware of. Therefore, are you going to let the British people perish in the UK, rather than tackle and expose the conspiratorial HM Partnership and HM Memorandum of Understanding?
Mr. Forward, does the IPCC approve and support the following illegal HM Partnership:
under: - Travel and transport:
“Most safety cameras in England and Wales are operated by local Safety Camera Partnerships. The partnerships are formed of the local authorities, the police, and the courts.” – Hence the conspiracy; and the conflict of interest of HM Courts to hear any cases when they are in PARTNERSHIP with HM Police and HM Local Authorities, which is a criminal violation of Article 6(1) of the Council of Europe Convention. “We (the Partnership) don’t make any profit from safety camera fines.
All fines are passed to HM Treasury”: - Is it OK for HM Partnership to ROB us of our homes and possessions so long as they pass them on to HM Treasury? Now you know why HM Police are NOT investigating serious crimes against us by HM Partnership in the UK. All for the benefit of HM Treasury. It is evil to the extreme is it not Mr. Forward?
3. Once again I am furnishing you with the following incontrovertible evidence of the robbery of my home and possessions by HM Conspiratorial Partnership in the hope that you will NOW do your duty and put an end to this organised crime against the British people forthwith:
Tax experts call for a bill of rights by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money:
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:
Report by Chris Fogarty of the Irish American News, May 2006:
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday February 12, 2005:
By Chris Fogarty: JUSTICE FOR THE IRISH IN ENGLAND?
Did you know that the Police hold a secret Irish blacklist?
Well you do now.
The police in the UK have failed in their duty to prosecute the known criminals in the above Irishman's case.
4. Mr. Forward, isn’t it the IPCC’s failure to tackle and expose the Partnerships and Memorandum of Understandings that the UK Police are conspiratorially involved in, that is enabling the following, torture and robbery of the people in the UK: -
** At debt's door **
It's a booming business but some unscrupulous bailiffs are conning people, lying and ripping them off. BBC reporter Jim Wheble went undercover for nine months to expose how some debt collectors cheat the public.
Important: Don’t forget to put your cursor on: “Watch the programme” to view how HM Partnership robs and rapes peoples homes: Please note how HM Police in the UK conspire / pretend to not know the law; to enable serious crimes to be committed against the British people by criminals operating on behalf of HM Partnership.
5. Mr. Forward, as you are a caseworker for the IPCC, does the IPCC also support and condone the following criminality against the British people by HM Partnership:
On 11 July 1996 and again on 6 July 2006, I Patrick Cullinane was framed-up by HM South Wales Police for speeding offences on, “M4 JUNCTION 33 CHAPEL LLANILLTERN TO 34 MISKIN” in 1996 - and - “M4 BETWEEN JCT 34 MISKIN AND JCT 35 PENCOED” in 2006, when I most certainly was NOT speeding on either of these occasions. I carefully observe the law and speed limits, as I am fully aware that HM Police Thugs are breaking the law on behalf of HM Treasury, as can clearly be seen here, yet again:
Where is this all going to end Mr. Forward if the IPCC are in on this scam, and failing to do its duty?
Sick and sinful is the man who abuses public office; evil is the man who enables him.
When the autopsy of our democracy is performed, it is my belief that media silence will be given as the primary cause of death.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and full assistance in these very serious public interest matters.
Patrick Cullinane, Caseworker for the IBRG and Victim of HM Partnership.
M.I.5 and how they undermine democracy 13 October 2006
M.I.5's primary role is to protect the devil worshipping and
blackmailing masonic royalists and their undemocratic hold and control
over UK citizens(subjects).
Any anti royalists in the UK face appalling legal and psychological
abuses equivalent to their middle age versions of being hung ,drawn and
quartered but without the physical marks.
Our own members have been held down by 8 or more nurses and had
anti-psychotic drugs pumped into them after protests.One was regularly
dragged away by police and beaten up in police cells.
Andy McCardle was finally murdered after similar (mis)treatments in
Carstairs concentration camp by the MASONIC MONSTERS controlling the
This type of appalling conduct NEVER gets publicity by the masonic hold
over the UK mass media who are complicite with the torture faced by
many who stand up against these evil monsters.
Tommy Sheridan and MI5's activities
Your Letters October 13 2006
THE Scottish media have responded to Tommy Sheridan's statement -
that history may well show MI5 involvement in the ongoing attempts to
end his political career - with condescending incredulity. The
inference has been that Sheridan has "lost his marbles" and descended
into egoistical paranoia. In short, this man, and his politics, must be
seen as a joke. The truth, in fact, is very different and it seems to
me obvious that if MI5 has not been watching and seeking to undermine
Tommy Sheridan and the causes he has espoused - it would not have
been doing its job.
Sheridan is a republican socialist dedicated to the establishment of an
independent Scotland. He is a committed anti-nuclear campaigner and a
fierce opponent of the Anglo-American "war on terror" (England's new
Hundred Years War). The British establishment, rightly, recognises him
as a genuine danger to the status quo of the British State and, like
the Murdoch press, the British intelligence services know themselves
free to "stretch the rules" a little to bring him down.
MI5 work with sticks and carrots, and there can be no doubt that it
has, over many years, infiltrated paid informers into the SSP, the
Green Party and the SNP. Their remit is to observe and survey but also
to destabilise the organisations of which they are part - and
mis-organisation, faux extremism and reductio ad absurdum are part of
their stock in trade (with flesh-traps a bonus for some). The only
surprising thing about the present debacle is that the ever-presentness
of MI5 in nationalist, republican and peace politics in Scotland is
not, publicly, recognised as a given.
My personal experience with MI5 is, fortunately, limited, but for the
past four years I have been working, intensively, on a two-volume
biography of Hamish Henderson - one of the most important and
influential Scotsmen of the twentieth century. My researches show that
Hamish (like John MacLean before him) was regularly under MI5
surveillance and that he suffered Intelligence harassment throughout of
his life. The first volume of this biography will appear in May 2007
and document facts to make one's hair stand on end.
Any opposed to the Bush/Blair attempt to define western civilisation
must expect small bruises - for the greater good - but it seems
clear to me that if an isolated writer and bee-keeper, ex-art historian
and film-maker like me has been subject to MI5 surveillance and
interference then a compulsive and influential political activist, such
as Tommy Sheridan, most certainly will be. Far from being nuts, he is
bearing the fruits of his labour, and the knives are out to cut him
down - stalk, branch, trunk and root.
Timothy Neat, 20 Hillpark Terrace, Wormit, Fife
Masonic bias in police job move 13 October 2006
A police officer was discriminated against because he
was not a Mason, an employment tribunal has ruled.
Royal Ulster Constabulary Reserve Constable Joseph
Gibson was moved from the motor transport depot in
1999 during staff cutbacks.
Another reservist who was retained was not as well
trained as Mr Gibson but was a member of the Masonic
The Fair Employment Tribunal held Mr Gibson was
unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of
It also held that the constable retained was a member
of the Masonic Order, as was at least one other person
involved in the selection process.
In a ruling the tribunal declared: "The respondents
did not provide a neutral working environment.
"As a result, those officers who did not belong to the
Masonic Order felt uncomfortable and excluded because
of the actions of those who did."
The tribunal will reconvene to decide upon the
The tribunal said membership of the Masonic Order is a
religious belief for the purposes of the Fair
Employment and Treatment (Northern Ireland) Order
The tribunal concluded "the decision to transfer the
claimant from the RUC Motor Transport Depot was
unlawful discrimination on grounds of religious
Mr Gibson brought the case before the tribunal, with
the assistance of the Equality Commission.
Eileen Lavery, head of legal services in the Equality
Commission, said people could not be discriminated
against because they were not Masons.
"The ruling of the tribunal is clear - that in the
workplace it is unlawful to discriminate against
someone because they are not a Mason," she said.
"It does not say that membership of the Masonic Order
is incompatible with any particular employment, but
rather that taking decisions in the workplace which
favour one person to the detriment of another, based
on Masonic membership, is unlawful."
Mr Gibson, now 67, originally from Belfast, took the
case against the RUC - which has since become the
Police Service of Northern Ireland - and the now
defunct NI Police Authority after being among the
officers selected for transfer.
The staff reduction followed a decision to switch
prisoner escort duties to the Prison Service.
A spokeswoman for the Police Service of Northern
Ireland said the force was studying the judgement
Why is a Navy Commanding Officer a member of a notorious secret society? 12 October 2006
Commander N R V Dorman RD RNR
Born at home, Stirlingshire, in 1965, Nicholas Dorman
was brought up in Cambridgeshire and Angus.
Dorman joined the RNR in 1984 at HMS Camperdown as a
Reserve University Midshipman. His first summer was
spent at Britannia Royal Naval College and subsequent
leave periods at sea principally on a variety of Ton
He gained a bridge watchkeeping certificate in 1986
and after completing the Navigation Course at HMS
Mercury sailed as Navigating Officer of a number of
River class minesweepers. He took Command of HMS
Archer in 1989 and went on to sail as First Lieutenant
on HM Ships Helmsdale, Spey and Dovey. After the
Options for Change defence review, he was transferred
from the Executive to the Operations MW (Sea) branch
and was affiliated to MCM2 serving on HMS Inverness.
Dorman took part in the United States Navy Reserve
exchange programme in 1996 and spent an enjoyable
summer in Corpus Christi, Texas, at what the Americans
called ‘The Home of Worldwide Minewarfare Excellence’!
On promotion to Lieutenant Commander in 1997, and
completion of both the MW and SRODC staff courses, he
joined MCM1’s Battlestaff and has deployed to the
Mediterranean, Black Sea, Baltic and Loch Ewe, (many
After serving three years as First Lieutenant at HMS
Scotia, where he co-ordinated the start up of TAY
Division in Dundee, he was appointed in 2001 to the
Commodores Staff as National Junior Officers Training
Officer. This was a newly created post and he had an
exciting and rewarding time in the coordination and
execution of Junior Officers training on a national
level. He was Officer in Charge of TAY Division
prior to taking Command of Scotia in April 2006.
Married to Lesley, a high school physics teacher, they
have one daughter Charlotte (2006) and live in Angus.
In his civilian career he is the Operations Director
of a ship Owning and Management company specialising
in towage with operations in the UK, Europe and the
Nick Dorman has a wide range of interests including
rugby, cricket, golf, travel, industrial gardening
(chainsaws) and fishing. He enjoys reading and has
wide tastes in literature and music; he is a member of
several organisations including the Royal Geographic
Society, Kirriemuir, Barry and Carnoustie golf clubs
and the Speculative Society.
WHO ARE THEY TRYING TO PROTECT?
The News of the World by Marcello Mega
DUNBLANE INQUIRY WAS A COVER-UP AND PEERS BULLIED ME
TO KEEP QUIET SAYS LORD BURTON, EX-MASONS LEADER
THE inquiry into the Dunblane massacre was a massive
cover-up, a top Scots Freemason has sensationally
claimed. Former Grand Master Lord Burton says that
Lord Cullen's official probe suppressed crucial
information to protect high-profile legal figures. He
says they may belong to a secretive "super-Mason"
group called The Speculative Society. Some had links
to Dunblane's Queen Victoria School -where gunman
Thomas Hamilton was allowed to roam free before the
1996 atrocity. And Lord Burton revealed that he was
bullied and threatened by other peers when he tried to
raise his concerns in the House of Lords.
Last night the 79-year-old aristocrat said: "There's
no escaping the fact that there's something sinister
about the whole affair." He was prompted into action
after reading in the News of the World last month that
police are investigating claims that pupils at QVS
were regularly taken away and sexually abused. The
Cullen Inquiry failed to investigate why suspected
paedophile Hamilton was allowed to wander around the
school whenever he liked, running camps and using the
Former housemaster Glenn Harrison told us how he even
found Hamilton, 43, creeping around the dormitories at
night. He said Hamilton, who murdered 16 pupils and a
teacher at Dunblane Primary School in 1996, had close
links to a top cop. Glenn said he was aghast that he
was never called to give evidence at the Cullen
Inquiry. He said: "I was one of the people who was
making a fuss about Hamilton long before he killed
those children, but no one wanted to listen." Now Lord
Burton has contacted him at his new home in the
Shetland Islands, saying he believes Glenn wasn't
called to give evidence to avoid the embarrassment of
top legal names being dragged into it. The QVS school
is for children of the miltary services and has
long-standing links to high office -its current patron
is the Duke of Edinburgh.
Whoever holds the position of Secretary of State for
Scotland becomes president and Scotland's second-most
senior judge, the Lord Justice Clerk, becomes a
Lord Burton said: "I was Grand Master of the Grand
Lodge of Scotland at the time and I'm aware that most
of the conspiracy theories around Dunblane revolve
around allegations of a Masonic conspiracy. "I do have
some difficulty with that, but I have learned of an
apparent connection between prominent members of the
legal establishment involved in the inquiry, and the
secretive Speculative Society. "The society was formed
at Edinburgh University through Masonic connections so
I accept that there might be a link by that route. But
Hamilton was never a Mason. His grandfather was."
Current members of The Speculative Society include
Lord Cullen and a number of other judges, sheriffs and
advocates. Lord Burton has been trying for years to
get to the bottom of the conspiracy theories, using
his influence in the House of Lords until the reforms
meant he was no longer entitled to sit in Westminster.
Last night he said: "I tried repeatedly to raise
concerns about the inquiry during my time in the
Lords, and I was bullied and threatened by powerful
peers loyal to the Conservative Government of the day,
who warned me of dire consequences if I continued to
embarrass them." But the determined peer pressed on
and in 1999, asked a question in the Lords which
revealed that documents from the inquiry had been
ordered to be locked up for 100 years. Among them was
a police report revealing that Hamilton had been
accused of sexually abusing boys and had been
considered by some officers unfit to hold a firearms
Lord Burton added: "We still need to know why that was
necessary. Who was the secrecy protecting?" Although
the official reason is to protect the families of
possible abuse victims, it's unusual for documents to
be locked up unless for matters of national security.
In July, Dunblane ambulance worker Sandra Uttley told
the News of the World how she and friend Doreen Hagger
had drawn up a 50-point, 5,000-word dossier calling
for secrecy surrounding the tragedy to be lifted. They
claimed that dozens of questions have gone unanswered
and crucial lines of enquiry were ignored. Former
ambulance worker Sandra said: "There may be other
individuals who should face prosecution." Glenn
Harrison had kept dozens of files from pupils alleging
bullying and abuse while he was at the QVS and wrote
to parents warning of the dangers in 1991. It led to
him being ousted from the school and just days before
he left, police raided his home and confiscated the
When Glenn read Sandra's story, he went back to police
-and this time they agreed to investigate . Last night
he said he in turn had been glad to receive the call
from Lord Burton. He added: "I've been making noises
for years and I sometimes despair and think it's time
to just accept we'll never get to the truth. "But I
think we owe it to all the people who were so affected
by the killings to continue to demand answers to the
many questions that were never asked." Glenn told us
that Hamilton had been a friend of Ben Philip, the
senior housemaster at the QVS. Mr Philip died in
December 1993, aged 46, when he fell from a ladder
while hanging decorations.
Glenn said: "They were friends so Hamilton was a
regular visitor to the school and I was introduced to
him. "Ben Philip was a decent guy who was very
trusting. "I think he thought he and Hamilton shared
interests in things like the outdoors, and he couldn't
see that Hamilton had another motive for wanting to be
around the school. "Hamilton ran camps in the school
grounds, and he used the shooting range freely.
"He came and went as he pleased, almost as if he owned
the place, and no one has ever tried to explain why he
had such freedom. "I am still haunted by the memory of
picking up my newspaper on March 14 1996 and reading
about what had occurred at Dunblane Primary School the
day before. "I just knew the killer had to be Thomas
Hamilton. He should have been stopped." Demands have
already been made to the Scottish Executive to
investigate the influence of The Speculative Society.
It was formed in 1764 as an offshoot of the Masons and
has counted Sir Walter Scott, Robert Louis Stevenson
and Hugh MacDiarmid among its most celebrated members.
The Spec, as it is known, is described by its members
as a debating club. They meet in candlelit vaults
below Edinburgh University's Old College in the
winter. Prospective members are normally approached
while they study at the university. Its membership
-which was secret until a year ago -reads like a Who's
Who of the rich and powerful in Scotland. Campaigners
were determined to reveal the membership amid
concerns, many expressed by senior lawyers who are not
members, of the disproportionate influence the Spec is
said to wield. One legal figure who has long been
suspicious of the Spec said: "Members laugh off the
suspicions and say it's just a debating club.
"But, given that the members are picked as undergrads
and almost without exception go on to reach the
pinnacle of their careers, you have to think either
that those making the selection are very astute at
spotting potential, or that membership gives you a leg
up in life. "I know which option I favour."
SIDE EFFECTS OF BULLY BOY NETWORKS 10 October 2006
With devil worshipping trolls controlling most of the staff who work for multi nationals and government agencies it doesn't surprise us the high rate of depression caused by the bully boy network that the BBC BULLY BOY CORPORATION promotes.
If the BBC where doing there job right protecting British Citizens there would be a far better working environment for staff to ensure depression was minimized from bullying bosses and allowed some reasonable working conditions.
However the SYSTEM ensures little devil worshipping HITLERS control the bulk of the British workforce in its management structures founded on masonic influence and their devious ways pass right through a workforce bullied and cajoled to prop up their masonic empire built on abuse and psychological torture.Our group members have experienced first hand exactly how that operates.
Depression 'can affect anybody'
A mental health campaign is warning that depression can affect anyone at any time.
NHS Lothian has teamed up with Edinburgh University and mental health charity Depression Alliance Scotland at the start of Mental Health Week.
It aims to raise awareness and broaden options for people living in Edinburgh and the Lothians with depression.
The Lothian Alliance Against Depression (LAAD) group will be officially launched on Wednesday.
'Sadness and despair'
The key message of the campaign entitled "Mother, father, son, daughter..." is that depression can affect anyone at any time.
Posters with this message can be seen on buses and in community settings.
There will also be presentations and examples of community-based approaches to the management of depression in the Lothians.
Depression in Scotland is a common medical condition, which often leads to intense feelings of sadness and despair, and affects one in every five people at some time in their lives.
Depression is a very common illness, but unlike other common illnesses, such as asthma or diabetes, depression has a stigma attached to it which prevents many people with depression from seeking help
In Edinburgh and the Lothians it is one of the most common reasons for people to visit their GP, but it is estimated that as many as 75% of people with depression do not seek help from their doctor.
Linda Irvine, NHS Lothian mental health strategic programme manager, said: "I am very excited about NHS Lothian becoming part of this European-wide project.
"I believe this awareness-raising campaign will attempt to change ingrained attitudes to depression, which is a common and generally treatable illness but is often under reported due to the stigma attached to it."
Ilena Day, chief executive for Depression Alliance Scotland, said: "Depression is a very common illness, but unlike other common illnesses, such as asthma or diabetes, depression has a stigma attached to it which prevents many people with depression from seeking help."
LAAD is also a partner in the European Alliance Against Depression, a project funded by the European Commission, which includes 18 European regions working together to share information to improve treatment and reduce stigma.
Screen politicans for megalomania 10 October 2006
While they consider ABHORRENT screening programs for our kids
maybe they should instead screen lawyers,judges,psychiatrists and
for signs of megalomania , delusions of grandeur and CORRUPT
Experts back screening for all five-year-olds to
All five-year-olds should be screened for early signs
of offending behaviour to prevent youngsters later
becoming criminals under plans put forward by a
Scottish Executive-backed expert group. Under the
proposals, pre-school services and nursery schools
will assess five-year-olds to identify troubled or
troublesome families and signs of substance misuse and
violence in the home.
The aim is to identify vulnerable children early,
offer improved support to the family and hopefully
turn young people away from crime.
But justice campaigners said the executive should
think carefully before implementing moves.
The news follows a move by police to target children
under three and teenage mothers-to-be as part of the
national drive to cut violent crime. The initiative,
by Scotland's Violence Reduction Unit, is founded on
unpublished research, commissioned by the executive,
which suggests the mental and emotional traits which
influence whether a person will become violent or not,
are developed by the age of three.
The new report on youth justice calls for a range of
measures to reduce youth offending, including more
access to leisure facilities and improved mental
The improvement group includes representatives from
local authorities, police and the Scottish Children's
Reporter Administration (SCRA).
Their report also includes proposals to strengthen the
monitoring and supervision of young sex offenders
following a report into the killing of Karen Dewar by
18-year-old Colyn Evans, in Fife, in January 2005.
Cathy Jamieson, the Justice Minister, yesterday
welcomed the Youth Justice Improvement Group (YJIG)
report and launched a blueprint to overhaul services
on the back of its recommendations.
Her response includes a call to: "Identify children at
risk of future or further offending or other poor
outcomes and take action early to improve their
situation." But it is not known whether the executive
will force authorities to implement every
Ms Jamieson said: "We have significantly increased
investment in youth justice...and the Antisocial
Behaviour Act has provided agencies with a range of
new tools and helped concentrate and focus local
"But...as the improvement group states, there is no
single solution to reducing offending, but a range of
family, community and individual approaches."
Hugh Mackintosh, chief executive of Barnardo's
Scotland and a member of the group, said early
assessment and intervention is key.
"Unless we make a concerted effort with early
intervention, then we are all going to have to pay the
price later on," he said. "There is a great deal of
work we can do to help children prior to school."
Councillor Eric Jackson, social work spokesman for
Cosla and YJIG member, said: "The earlier we intervene
the more effective we can be. If there are groups at
risk of offending later on, then we need to look at
providing support for these children."
But Margaret Mitchell, Scottish Tory Justice
spokeswoman, said the report was too full of jargon
and lacking in action.
John Scott, chairman of the Howard League in Scotland,
said the executive should think carefully before
implementing moves to assess five year olds.
He said: "We have already, through the children's
hearing system, identified children at risk of
"Simply identifying them and doing nothing about it is
pointless. If we can intervene, then it is difficult
to argue against."
Compulsory electro shock treatment for Scottish patients 10 October 2006
Fears for dozens of patients given electric shock
therapy against their will
DOZENS of psychiatric patients were given electric
shock treatment without their consent in Scottish
hospitals last year despite huge controversy over the
safety of the treatment.
Almost 10% of patients given electro-convulsive
therapy (ECT) underwent the procedure as a compulsory
treatment for severe depression, according to figures
seen by Scotland on Sunday.
Last night doctors revealed some patients are forcibly
held down and anaesthetised for the procedure,
prompting grave concerns from mental health
campaigners who warn that its side-effects include
confusion, headaches and long-term memory loss.
But psychiatrists insist ECT can help some patients
with severe depression for whom medication is not
An audit of Scottish hospitals in 2005 by the Scottish
ECT Accreditation Network reveals 433 patients
underwent the treatment. A total of 38 had it without
giving their consent. Last night, Donny Lyons,
director of the Mental Welfare Commission for
Scotland, said he believed it was right to treat
people against their will if experts agreed ECT was
the best option.
He said: "It is done sensitively and we have to be
clear why we think a patient needs it. Any force
should be kept to a minimum. Using force is extremely
unpleasant and rare. You may get people resisting or
objecting. Sometimes some general restraint is
"ECT is a good thing because it works in people with
severe depression; 70% of people will get very
significantly better. The more severe the depression,
the better it works. It does work very well and it is
a good treatment but it does have its risks and can
cause memory difficulties."
New safeguards on ECT were included in Scotland's new
Mental Health Act, which came into force last October.
According to the new law, patients cannot be given the
treatment forcibly unless they are deemed too mentally
ill to be able to make an informed decision. Yet Lyons
said it is too early to say whether the new laws are
having any effect on the number of people treated
forcibly. ECT involves placing electrodes on the
temples, on one or both sides of the patient's head,
and delivering a small electrical current. Patients
are treated with short-acting anaesthetics and muscle
The current produces a seizure lasting up to a minute
and can provide short-term relief from severe
According to the audit, the highest rates of ECT were
in Grampian, with 93 patients, and Lothian with 61
Moira Fraser, head of policy at the Mental Health
Foundation urged extreme caution over the treatment
because of its effects on the memory.
She said: "ECT is very controversial. The impact
varies from individual to individual, so you have to
be very cautious. If someone is capable of
understanding the decision they are making and they
have said no, for example because of the long-term
memory problems, then it is only in very rare
circumstances that it should be given."
Sandra McDougall, influence and change manager at the
Scottish Association for Mental Health, said: "It's
absolutely vital that people thinking about having the
treatment are able to access good quality information
about potential benefits and risks so that they can
make an informed choice about whether to go ahead with
"It's only possible for someone to be given ECT
without their consent where they've been assessed as
not having the capacity to make a treatment decision,
and are being treated under relevant legislation."
ACTIVIST JUDGES JAILING MEN WHO THEN CANT VOTE 10 October 2006
Modern-Day 'Poll Tax' Costs GOP Votes
The Democratic Party's instituted policies and
pandering to the radical woman's movement are
responsible for at least 1 million non-felons-divorced
American men commonly known as fathers-who are today
being denied the right to vote. How is that possible?
It is done by the imposition of a new-fangled "poll
tax" by activist judges.
Here is the short of it. Right now, there is estimated
to be 1 million individuals in county jails on any
given day. Curiously, no statistics regarding
non-felons in prisons are kept by the Justice
The issue is now playing out all across America's
3,141 counties and parishes. These individuals who
have not committed any crime are the target of
activist judicial discrimination based upon their sex.
They have not been accused of a crime. They have not
had a trial by jury of their peers. In fact, they have
not been convicted of any crime. They are in jail
until they-even if they cannot comply-pay a judge's
arbitrarily established sum in order to be released
from jail. This is a clear violation of the 13th
Amendment and federal statues against peonage, slavery
as well as involuntary and indentured servitude,
respectively. This mirrors ransom as well, as I see
it. This is not a joke!
Unless the money is paid, the person will remain in
prison for an alleged debt, unconstitutionally I say,
deprived of his liberty. According to press reports,
there is one individual in a Pennsylvania county
prison for more than 11 years. He has not had a trial
by jury or been accused of a crime; the judge wants
money he does not have.
Now comes the inconceivable part. The incarcerated I
speak of are innocent individuals; about 95%, or more,
are males. They are non-felons who are being denied
the right to vote in this current 2006 election
because of an alleged debt.
This is occurring in both state and federal elections
across the entire country. They are, in fact,
constitutionally viable voters in the upcoming federal
elections. It is for them to late to vote in the
primaries, which have come and passed.
Of the states and politicians that I have so far tuned
into, here is the current situation:
In Connecticut, where the liberal Democratic Sen.
Christopher Dodd rules, no individual in jail is
allowed to vote-felon or not.
In Tennessee ex-felons who pay off the court costs are
allowed to vote-unless they owe child support.
In the state of Washington, a recent Supreme Court
decision stated that it is unconstitutional to prevent
recent former felons from voting if they owed court
costs. Yet, nothing is said about men who are alleged
to owe child support, as they are non-felons in jail,
though they never had a trial by jury of their peers.
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.) says nothing about the
longstanding denial of the right to vote by way of a
"poll tax" for these American men.
In New Jersey, a Democratic-leaning state, the fathers
in jail for child support are not allowed to vote,
although if one is a pretrial detainee-to clarify,
let's say being held for murder-that person is allowed
to vote. At the same time, the Democrats also demand
that terrorists-at Gitmo and everywhere else-get
constitutional protections, which divorced American
men do not get and the pro-terrorists left is deathly
silent about it.
Unlike Republicans, Democrats are focused on the issue
of enlisting new voters who are not constitutionally
approved voters. It is no secret Democrats would be
thrilled to welcome illegal foreigners to vote in
federal elections. This is now taking place in
California and probably other states as well.
Democrats actually oppose any photo I.D. being
presented as proof of U.S. citizenship prior to anyone
exercising the right to vote.
Republicans should stop sitting on the fence looking
and waiting to see which way the cows went so that
they may be corralled in their barn. Radical feminists
do not vote for Republicans. Get used to it!
Republicans can take full advantage of this situation
and the concomitant votes by merely standing out front
and publicly directing all jails across the nation to
provide all necessary information as if these innocent
voters were at home and at liberty. Add to this recipe
absentee ballots, which clearly must be provided to
This can be done by way of their campaign
organizations, which can also provide Republicans
factual information directly to those affected, as
opposed to the "lemming" left-wing newspapers and
media. This would compensate the Republicans for the
unattainable votes from the radical feminists who vote
exclusively for Democrats.
Mr. Weinstein is an activist who was once the innocent
target of New Jersey prosecutor Nicholas Bissel. The
indictment against him was dismissed with prejudice.
BIG BROTHER PERVERTS 9 October 2006
WHO IS WATCHING THEM WHO IS WATCHING US?
Peeping tom CCTV workers jailed
Two council CCTV camera operators have been jailed for spying on a naked woman in her own home.
Mark Summerton and Kevin Judge, from Sefton Council, Merseyside, trained a street camera into the woman's flat.
At Liverpool Crown Court, Summerton, 37, of Kirkdale, Liverpool, admitted voyeurism and attempted voyeurism. He was sentenced to four months in prison.
Judge, 42, from Waterloo, admitted misconduct in public office and was jailed for two months.
He was cleared of voyeurism last month.
Summerton was also ordered to sign the Sex Offenders' Register.
You only have to read the impact statements of the lady to realise the harrowing effect this had on her
Judge Gerald Clifton
Team leader Vincent Broderick, 52, of Bootle, Merseyside, admitted misconduct in public office on the grounds that he did not see the woman when she was naked, but knew the cameras were being misused and failed to report it.
He was sentenced to 200 hours' community service.
The images from the camera, including the woman without her clothes on, were shown on a large plasma screen in the council's CCTV control room in November 2004, Liverpool Crown Court heard.
Over several hours, she was filmed cuddling her boyfriend before undressing, using the toilet, having a bath and watching television dressed only in a towel.
Judge Gerald Clifton told the three men: "To dismiss what was happening as laddish behaviour, something that the 21st Century apparently condones, is absurd.
"You only have to read the impact statements of the lady to realise the harrowing effect that this had on her.
"Her life has almost been ruined, her self-confidence entirely destroyed by the thought that prying male eyes have entered her flat."
During his voyeurism trial, Judge claimed he had only seen the woman naked for a brief moment and had told Summerton, who was controlling the camera, that he was "out of order".
The jury was satisfied but Judge Clifton said he did not believe this account.
He said: "I am amply satisfied that your involvement was larger than you are prepared to admit, that you were at some stage controlling the camera, and that you were watching and enjoying the events going on."
A Sefton Council spokesman said safeguards already in place meant the culprits were "caught and dismissed by us promptly".
"We will not tolerate an abuse of position from any of our staff or accept such a failure to meet the high standards of behaviour and professionalism we expect."
BRITISH MEDIA VIEW OF DEMOCRACY 8 October 2006
The British media have controlled UK elections for eons.Despite both Labour and Tories implicated in criminal acts particularly cash for peerages they still spend the bulk of their editorials on Labour and tory promotion.
WHY do the British media control who is given maximum publicity and exposure year after year?The ILLUMINATI controlled media's rich owners have NO intention of ALLOWING any other parties to gain a foothold in the political circles.
The devil worshipping trolls who hand pick the labour and tory leader also control the bulk of the UK's media to ensure no matter who wins, their man or in thatchers case woman will control the UK in the same identical way they have done for as far back as anyone can remember.
THE BRITISH MEDIA'S view of democracy is a very blinkered vision of spending lots of time and energies on a two horse(donkey) race with a sprinkling of other parties like the Liberals who are funded much the same way and in Scotland the SNP who are also funded in much the same way.
For any party that hasn't a few millionaires on tap to provide the funds to compete with these illuminati selected parties is impossible.The SYSTEM ensures corruption is the key way our supposed democracy operates and that LITTLE can be done to change the MONSTERS who time and again get voted in by an unsuspecting public.
THE MASS MEDIA THROUGH ITS CONTROL BY DEVIL WORSHIPPING TROLLS ENSURE BRITAIN MAINTAINS AN ILLUSION OF DEMOCRACY WHILE MAINTAINING MASONIC CONTROL OF BRITAIN .THE BULLYING NETWORK WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THIS CYCLE OF DECEIT IS BROKEN.
ALL MASS MEDIA IN THE UK ARE THERE TO ENSURE THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS KEPT ON TRACK BY PROTECTING THE ESTABLISHMENTS POSITION WITH THEIR WARPED PERSPECTIVE OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL MONSTERS DOMINATING AND CONTROLLING THE UK WITH AN IRON FIST.
ALABAMA GOVERNOR CHALLENGED AS MASON 6 October 2006
Ala. governor defends membership in white Masonic lodge
By JAY REEVES
The Associated Press
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Gov. Bob Riley is defending his membership in a Masonic organization that critics say excludes blacks.
Riley, a Republican who is running for re-election against Democratic Lt. Gov. Lucy Baxley, is a member of a Masonic lodge in his east Alabama hometown of Ashland that is affiliated with the Grand Lodge of Alabama, a statewide group with no known blacks among more than 30,000 members.
Speaking in an interview with The Associated Press, Riley said he did not know whether his lodge had any black members. But Riley denied that the Masonic group is racist, as did two leaders of the organization in interviews Friday.
Riley's membership in the Masons has been mentioned on Internet blogs and was a hot topic on a Birmingham-based talk show hosted by Russ and Dee Fine, Baxley supporters who claim they were fired earlier this week partly for pointing out Riley's membership in the Masons.
In an interview, Dee Fine said a governor shouldn't be a member of an all-white group, particularly since Grand Lodge documents dating to 1876 show it bars blacks as members.
"If nothing else it's surely not politically astute," she said.
Riley said the comments about his ties to Masonry are "bordering on ridiculous." He said that he knows some black Masons.
"Both Shriners and Masons do a lot of good," Riley said in the interview Thursday after a campaign fundraiser with President Bush.
The head of the Grand Lodge of Alabama, Grand Master Frank W. Little, said he knows of no blacks among the 32,000 members of the state organization, which has 318 lodges and accepts new members by applications and referrals from other members.
But Little denied that there is anything in the organization's current constitution or edicts to prevent a black from joining.
"To my knowledge I don't know of any black who's ever applied for membership in the Grand Lodge," he said. "Is there anything that would prevent them? No. As the grand master, if I heard of any lodge that denied a man membership because of his race they wouldn't be a lodge for long."
Riley campaign spokesman Josh Blades said plenty of Democrats also are Masons, including former Gov. Jim Folsom Jr. of Cullman, who is running for lieutenant governor, plus House Speaker Seth Hammett of Andalusia and Senate Pro Tem Lowell Barron of Fyffe.
Folsom and Hammett didn't immediately return phone calls, but Barron said he is proud of his membership in the Masons and the Shrine, a related organization. Neither group discriminates, he said, and Masons support Shrine charity hospitals that treat people of all races.
"There's no organization I know of that does more good," said Barron.
A separate Masonic organization, the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, is composed almost exclusively of blacks and has chapters all over the country, including Alabama.
Another state Masonic official, Grand Secretary Jerry M. Underwood, said the group has an ethnically diverse membership even though critics say it has no blacks.
"We have Hispanics and Indians," he said. "In fact, we brought in an Iranian here in Montgomery a few weeks ago."
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY v JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE 6 October 2006
Our groups have spent years compiling monstrous acts of abuse against the UK and USA's general public by a political and legal cabal where most of the key players are members of devil worshipping cults.
The UK's media repeatedly publish the mantra of the UK's corrupt judiciary about their need for independence.The assumption being that ultimately the long suffering British public require judicial independence before judicial accountability .
It was the rise of HITLERS fascism that was not accountable that led to the monstrous acts against its people with massive land ,property and asset stripping on a GRAND scale.
This is identical as to what is going on in the UK and USA except the media are never about to report on such matters ,they concentrate their energies on small time crooks that provides a smokescreen that allow the BIG BOYS to get away with MURDER.
The judiciary in the UK are steeped in masonic devil worshipping corruption.Indeed it was the speculative society an elite masonic cabal full of devil worshipping judges and lawyers that had deliberately and collusively distorted evidence that could have caught Thomas Hamilton before he murdered 16 children in cold blood at Dunblane.
The failures of the system prior to the Dunblane massacre by senior police officers and court officers has led to restrictions of any form of instrument that might be used against a UK state controlled by a tyranny that has been riding roughshod over ALL our human rights for way to long.
The deliberate selection of cases and the application of Human Rights Laws hand picked by the judiciary
and published by the media distorts the proper administration of the Human rights act.Instead how it is being perceived by the judiciary as a way for serial criminals to get light sentencing or early release while all who have faced the disgusting spectacle of civil court actions in the UK have had major abuses of their human rights while they see criminals getting recompense for slopping out in prisons.
It may be correct that EVERYONE has the right to respect for their HUMAN RIGHTS including those who break the law ,however it is only one small group of serial criminals that the judiciary and their lackies the lawyers concentrate on.The main reason is the sooner they can get a serial criminal out of jail the sooner they can once again milk the BILLION pound legal aid budget to defend them.If only our press would TELL THE TRUTH instead of seemingly reporting human rights cases as if written by the very legal crooks who use it to their own financial advantage .
For every serial criminal there is a RICH legal aid lawyer hanging onto his coat tail.The British public want JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY not supposed independence that makes them accountable only to themselves.We can say with certainty it is the courts and judges that are the serial destroyers of British citizens thanks to that unaccountable INDEPENDENCE.
CORRUPT CROWN GODFATHER JUMPS BEFORE HE IS BOOTED OUT 5 October 2006
Boyd heads the crime wave of land and property theft throughout Scotland.THE McKie case is only ONE of many he is implicated in.
George Farquhar,Dixie Deans and Andy McCardles death and THE abuses IMPOSED at the hands of the Scottish legal system using mental health act to bully ,abuse and murder Andy are FAR MORE IMPORTANT .
Also Jim Duffs brave action to force Boyd into court in the coming weeks regards massive land and property fraud EXPOSED Boyds corrupt crown operations.
BUT THE SCOTTISH PRESS HAVE FAILED TIME AND AGAIN TO EXPOSE HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THESE HORRENDOUS CASES instead concentrating solely on ONE case that has had far to much media attention compared with the cases where individuals have died at the abusive hands of the corrupt Scottish crown office
Law chief quits but denies McKie case is the reason
Scotland's most senior law officer and the head of the country's prosecution system resigned last night, prompting a wave of speculation about his sudden departure.
Colin Boyd, QC, who became Lord Boyd of Duncansby in July, said he would stand down at midnight after six years in the post. He said he wanted to play a fuller part in the House of Lords and to seek work in the private sector.
Jack McConnell, First Minister, is expected to propose a successor at the Scottish Parliament today. If MSPs vote in favour, the name will then be recommended to the Queen.
Elish Angiolini, the Solicitor General and Scotland's second most senior law officer, is the favourite to replace Lord Boyd. If chosen, she would be the first female Lord Advocate since the role evolved 500 years ago.
The Scottish Executive insisted Mr McConnell had known about Lord Boyd's departure "for some time", but the news caught many MSPs off-guard. And his exit was announced at a hastily assembled press conference at 3pm.
The timing prompted MSPs to claim he may have quit over the Shirley McKie affair, or the Lockerbie trial.
A parliamentary inquiry into the case of Shirley McKie, the former police officer paid £750,000 after being wrongly accused of leaving her fingerprint at a murder scene, has just concluded but is yet to report its findings.
Lord Boyd decided to prosecute Ms McKie for perjury when she denied leaving her print. Last night her father, Iain McKie, said: "I feel the legal profession has lost faith in him."
The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission is also due to report on the 2001 trial of Abdelbaset al Megrahi, the Libyan convicted over the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 with the loss of 270 lives. This could result in a retrial. Lord Boyd was responsible for the original prosecution.
Lord Boyd's exit comes amid upheaval in the legal profession. Ministers were last month forced to water down reforms of the complaints system after a backlash from lawyers.
One Labour minister was last night briefing back benchers that Lord Boyd had been made to pay for the executive's decision not to back a bill on corporate killing last week.
Karen Gillon, Labour MSP for Clydesdale, had the support of more than half of all MSPs for the measure, which would allow senior executives to be pursued for a company's negligence. However, the executive failed to give the bill its support after legal advice.
Lord Boyd, 53, denied any link to Lockerbie or McKie, and said he had gone because he had been in government 10 years, and his six-and-a-half years as Lord Advocate made him the longest-serving holder of the post in a century.
"This is the right time for me to move, and for somebody else to take my place."
Kenny MacAskill, the SNP justice spokesman, said it was time to separate the Lord Advocate's roles as head of the Crown Office and chief legal adviser to the executive.
"Colin Boyd's time in office will be under a cloud until we have a full inquiry in the case of Shirley McKie. This episode has only underlined the need for any future appointee to be independent of ministers."
However, the executive said there were no plans to recast the Lord Advocate's role.
Blackmail case judges face probe 4 October 2006
Two judges involved in a high-profile blackmail trial
are to be investigated by the judicial watchdog.
Immigration judges Mohammed Ilyas Khan and his female
colleague - known only as Judge J - will be
investigated by the Office for Judicial Complaints.
Brazilian cleaner Roselane Driza worked illegally for
both judges. Both said they were unaware of her
The lord chancellor said there was particular concern
over the issue of hiring an illegal worker.
The lord chancellor and lord chief justice decided
there were "sufficient grounds" for a preliminary
The investigation will also look at the impact of
other issues on the image of the judiciary.
Driza, 37, told the court she found two intimate
videos of Judge Khan - in one he was with Judge J and
she was apparently snorting cocaine. Judge J strongly
denied any suggestion she had taken drugs.
Driza, who is liable to eventually be deported back to
Brazil, was also convicted of stealing intimate videos
from Judge Khan.
Driza was acquitted of blackmailing Judge Khan but
convicted of the same offence against Judge J.
There was great media interest in the case, with the
court hearing how Judge J and Judge Khan had been
lovers, with the latter eventually starting an affair
Neither judge - who are both employed by the Asylum
and Immigration Tribunal - will be sitting while the
inquiry is ongoing.
Judge Khan, who sits as a Recorder, will remain on
full pay, while Judge J, on sick leave with stress for
18 months, will continue on the same pay. Neither has
Officials conducting the investigation will speak to
the judges and "relevant third parties", likely to
include Driza and witnesses from her trial.
They will pass their findings to a nominated judge,
who has not yet been named.
The judge will then advise the lord chancellor and
lord chief justice whether the matter should be taken
Sanctions available following the investigation range
from warnings and reprimands to removal from office in
A statement from the Department for Constitutional
Affairs said: "The lord chancellor and the lord chief
justice strongly believe that the public must have
confidence in judges, and take seriously any
allegations against them of misconduct...
"In particular the lord chancellor and lord chief
justice are concerned about the allegation that Mr
Khan and Ms J employed Miss Driza as a cleaner when
she was ineligible to work in this country."
The statement added: "On a more general note, the lord
chancellor and lord chief justice have great
confidence in the professionalism and high standards
of the judiciary as a whole and consider it
unfortunate if these allegations are seen as calling
this into question."
THE SECOND SCOTTISH CORRUPT LEGAL GODFATHER BOOTED OUT 4 October 2006
Scotland's lord advocate resigns
Scotland's top prosecutor is resigning from his job,
it has been announced.
The Lord Advocate Lord Boyd has written to First
Minister Jack McConnell to inform him of his plans.
A statement from the first minister's spokesman
confirmed Lord Boyd of Duncansby QC would stand down
from his post at midnight on Wednesday.
He was recently given a life peerage and intends to
play a full role in the House of Lords and seek
opportunities in the private sector.
Lord Boyd was head of the prosecution service for
almost 10 years and was also the Scottish Executive's
senior legal adviser.
In his letter to Mr McConnell, he said: "I have been
in government since May 1997 and am now the longest
serving Lord Advocate for over 100 years.
"It is time for me to move on."
Lord Boyd's work has involved the prosecution in the
Lockerbie bombing trial and he has been caught up in
the controversy surrounding the Shirley McKie
The executive stressed that his decision to stand down
was not related to the McKie investigation.
The first minister expressed his disappointment in his
reply to the lord advocate.
He added: "You leave a legacy of which you should be
I would have thought the sensible thing to do would
be to see through the Legal Profession and Legal Aid
Bill and to await the outcome of the justice 1
committee report into the Shirley McKie case
"The Lockerbie trial raised the profile and
credibility of the prosecution service in Scotland and
your leadership of the Crown Office has been first
The Scottish National Party welcomed his departure and
said he had been under a cloud over the McKie case.
Nationalist MSP Alex Neill told BBC Scotland's
Holyrood Live programme: "I believe that Lord Boyd has
recognised his failings in this case and that's the
real reason he's going at this moment."
Conservative MSP Margaret Mitchell said the sudden
departure was strange and unexpected.
Ms Mitchell said: "I would have thought the sensible
thing to do would be to see through the Legal
Profession and Legal Aid Bill and to await the outcome
of the justice 1 committee report into the Shirley
McKie case and into the investigation of the SCRO
(Scottish Criminal Record Office).
"For him to go before that seems an astounding
Lord Boyd began as a solicitor in private practice
before being called to the Scottish Bar in 1983.
He worked as an advocate depute from 1993 to 1995 and
took Silk in 1995.
He was then solicitor general for Scotland from May
1997 until his appointment as the lord advocate.
In April 2006 he was appointed to the House of Lords,
taking his title from Duncansby Head in Caithness.
His duties will be taken up by the current Solicitor
General, Elish Angiolini QC.
The first minister is expected to reveal details of
plans for selecting a replacement. It is up to Mr
McConnell to nominate a candidate for the post.
BRITS SICK OF UK MEDIA PROMOTING TWO POLITICAL DONKEYS 3 October 2006
Once again the British media are playing silly buggers with us by promoting the same pair of corrupt criminal parties it has done so for most of the last millenium.
Any hope of new parties breaking thro to challenge the masonic /illuminati candidates of the TORY party or labour party is lost from the unhealthy control the media have over who politically they promote.Also the length of time and energy they spend allowing criminals to portray themselves as WORTHY of the long suffering british publics vote.
Dont let the national TV stations fool you with the endless propaganda that the UK has a democracy.Just look at the promotion of the criminals operating in the tory party ,who have been caught time and again being illegally bankrolled by millionaires some who dont even live in the UK.
Also Blairs NEW labour that is basically making sure the funds to promote their criminality at the next election will come from millionaires rather than the working classes.
The establishment and its secret society devil worshipping trolls have hijacked British elections and with the help of their mafia mobster friends ,who own or control most of the British media ,are getting away with daylight robbery while helping to prop up those who bankroll them into power using peerages bought illegally.
The sickness that is destroying British life falls right at the door of the mass media owners and editors who promote crooks as some sort of NEW political force.All they do is reinforce the criminal fraternity that continues to dominate and abuse political and legal power under the guise of MASONIC democracy to the detriment of ALL UK citizens.
Chief Executive MILL BOOTED OUT of the Law Society of Scotland 3 October 2006
We believe the Chief Executive of the Law Society of Scotland godfather and crook Douglas Mill is being removed from his position by the Council of the Law Society.
He has headed for far to many years an utterly corrupt regime that has caused endless misery and persecution of victims of Scottish Law .His position was advertised in the Scotsman on friday.
For all the victims of this system who provided written and oral evidence to the Legal profession and legal aid bill this is a major victory as we know HE headed the despicable system of massive land and property fraud that had been going on for to long in Scottish courts.
Some of those victims have lost their lives through suffering major depression from the psychological pressures induced by the destructive powers of the Scottish legal system as it presently stands.
THE BATTLE FOR COMPENSATION FOR ALL THE VICTIMS CONTINUES
Divisions grow in legal profession over Clementi 2 October 2006
UNITED THEY STAND DIVIDED THEY FALL
Divisions grow in legal profession over Clementi
Scotland's apparent reluctance to free up legal
services has split the nation's 10,000 lawyers. These
divisions now threaten to metamorphose into gaping
fissures, after the Westminster government reiterated
there will be no u-turn on the path to far-reaching
reform in England and Wales.
Some Scottish law firms have already threatened to
relocate their "brass plaques" to England so they can
appoint non-lawyer partners and raise external
capital. Meanwhile, senior solicitors are
contemplating a pro-reform lobbying campaign targeted
at Holyrood and bypassing the Law Society of Scotland,
which has serious reservations about "taking the low
In the last few days, moreover, the profession's other
branch has witnessed the historic breakaway of
Edinburgh's new Oracle Chambers, launched by advocates
John Campbell QC and John Carruthers.
As The Herald revealed on Wednesday, the pair have
quit Faculty Services Ltd (FSL), the services arm of
the 500-year-old Faculty of Advocates. They blame the
body's alleged failure to contemplate reforms mooted
for England and Wales in the landmark Clementi report.
All 470 practising advocates have been invited to join
Campbell and Carruthers in what is a direct challenge
to the faculty's control of the Scottish Bar, if not
an outright palace coup. For them the current status
quo of sole traders operating through loosely
affiliated "stables" belongs firmly in the past.
Oracle's prospectus is arrestingly blunt: "FSL employs
around 160 people," it states. "Despite its undoubted
financial resources, FSL has no electronic diary
system or case management provision and its fee
rendering and debt collection remains notorious. FSL
has no recognisable marketing strategy. Its management
"Advocates north of the border have never had an
alternative to the existing clerking structure. There
are no competitive forces at work in our market and
innovation is lacking and perhaps even stifled. It has
long been our practice to do nothing or postpone
decisions indefinitely. This has meant putting up with
an indifferent debt collection service on the basis
that this is 'the nature of the advocates' business'.
Virtually no-one has seriously considered advertising
and marketing. Business development is done in an ad
The rebels are unequivocal in their admiration for
what is going on in England, where,by contrast, the
"chambers marketplace is dynamic and competitive".
Campbell and Carruthers bluntly declare that the
Scottish Bar has been protected from an evolving
market by its monopoly over rights of audience. This
advantage has been lost; solicitors now retain work
Oracle Chambers, by contrast, has promised a
"concerted marketing effort", to include a newsletter
targeted at solicitors and a start-up programme in
conjunction with the Law Society's journal.
Susan O'Brien QC, chairman of Faculty Services,
staunchly defended FSL's record. She said: "Faculty
Services is proving itself able and willing to improve
and innovate. I believe that the company, which is
tailor-made for the Scottish situation, will continue
to ensure that costs are kept down and that advocates
using Faculty Services will be able to provide the
most efficient and cost effective service to the
people of Scotland."
The gauntlet was thrown down as the Westminster
government published its official response to a
Parliamentary Joint Committee report on the
controversial draft legal services bill. One of the
proposals green-lighted by the Department for
Constitutional Affairs is the creation of new legal
disciplinary practices (LDPs). This will allow English
barristers and solicitors to form partnerships without
the need for outside ownership or a special licence.
The government has also ruled out extending the
timetable for the introduction of alternative business
structures opening up law firms to external
investment, saying there was no need to "artificially
delay implementation and the benefits to clients".
Scots clients and consumers will have longer to wait
to sample the benefits of reforms known by the
descriptive shorthand of "Tesco Law".
"MacClementi", a working party report on the legal
services market commissioned by the Scottish Executive
and published earlier this year, was widely viewed as
a damp squib. This does not mean Scotland has reached
a total impasse. As Campbell and Carruthers have
demonstrated, markets have a habit of driving change
while legislators and regulators sit on their hands.
Meanwhile, lawyers might ponder the words of the Dean
of the Faculty, commenting on the government's review
of legal services. Since England and Wales are
embarking on their own review, he stressed, Scotland
cannot afford to be left out. He added: "It (the
Faculty) has done much in recent years to modernise
and improve its practices and organisation".
The Dean in question was David Hope QC, and he was
speaking in October 1988. Scotland has been down the
low road before.
THE BIG PICTURE 2 October 2006
A documentary in the making about the direction of the world, the truth about current events, corruption in mainstream media, and everything censored. ...
JUDGES,ADVOCATES AND POLICE CONNECTED TO UNTOUCHABLES 1 October 2006
THE MONSTERS WHO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND WHO USE
SENIOR JUDGES,ADVOCATES AND POLICE CONNECTED TO EVIL RING
MOIRA MURDER CONFESSION A HOAX
Hidden dossier about child sex abuse ring
A SECRET dossier naming members of a paedophile sex
ring responsible for the murder of Moira Anderson can
today be exposed as a cruel hoax.
The 26-page file lists notorious killers Robert Black,
Fred West and Thomas Hamilton as members of the SAME
child sex ring as judges, senior advocates and police
And it lists a dead Scots Tory MP and Labour MP and
murdered SNP activist Willie Macrae as being part of
the evil "club" known as The Untouchables.
It also includes claims about the identity of 60s
killer Bible John. Moira disappeared aged 11 in 1957
during a blizzard in Coatbridge, Lanarkshire, and her
body has never been found.
Although no one was jailed over her disappearance,
Sandra Brown - the daughter of convicted paedophile
Alexander Gartshore - is convinced her father murdered
Last night, Moira's family reacted with fury after the
document was handed to the Sunday Mail - and dismissed
as a hoax by a senior policeman.
Moira's sister, Janet Hart, who lives in Australia,
said yesterday: "This is a bombshell because we were
putting a lot of weight on what was in this dossier.
"This has come as a big, big shock." Campaigners -
including Moira's family - have been fighting to get
the dossier released under the Freedom of Information
act since it was handed over to police in 2003.
But the scrawled deathbed "confession" by paedophile
James Gallogley was dismissed by the police chief
investigating the case.
Superintendent Alan Buchanan said the only name
missing was Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe.
The document was written by paedophile Alexander Keil
- who claims he was a prison pal of Gallogley - six
months AFTER Gallogley died in Peterhead, in April
Keil has tried to tout the full dossier for £20,000 -
but handed it to a Sunday Mail reporter last week
without any money changing hands.
Janet added: "We were hoping the information Keil had
in his file was going to take Moira's case forward.
"I am very disappointed." I'm very shocked about this.
"At the beginning, I suspected he was in it for money.
But, after hearing about the first 15 pages, it seemed
quite feasible and raised our hopes.
"This is 10 steps backwards. It is such a long time
ago now but I'd hoped facts would come to light to
locate my sister's remains. But time is against us.
"We know Alex Gartshore did it but I do believe he was
not the only one involved. There had to be more than
one and the sighting at the time said there were two
"As far as I'm concerned, Keil is the lowest of the
The "confession" amounts to a collection of
politicians' and killers' names but no hard facts. It
Moira was killed by Gartshore and Gallogley and abused
by Fred West.
A Tory MP "club" member was caught with an underage
girl in a top hotel but the incident was hushed up.
Dunblane killer Thomas Hamilton went to sex parties in
Perth with a police inspector and regularly acted as a
driver for members of the ring.
Gallogley killed a girl and dumped her body at Ibrox
stadium while it was being redeveloped.
The Sunday Mail can detail the dossier's contents for
the first time. Keil, 58, of Boat of Garten, near
Inverness, insists it was transcribed immediately
after speaking to Gallogley in Peterhead.
Gallogley says in the document he and Gartshore, the
last man seen with Moira, were responsible for the
But, in an exclusive interview with the Sunday Mail,
the senior detective responsible for the investigation
into the dossier dismissed it as lies.
Strathclyde Police Superintendent Alan Buchanan said:
"During our investigation, we received information
from a paedophile who was a known friend of Gallogley
in Peterhead Prison.
"He said when Gallogley received a letter from Moira
Anderson's sister asking if he knew anything about the
case, Gallogley denied involvement.
"Gallogley told him nothing that wasn't already in the
public domain -either from newspaper reports or Sandra
Brown's 1999 book - that a person he used to work
with, Alex Gartshore, was responsible.
"We'll never know if Gallogley and Keil ever had a
conversation in respect of Moira Anderson or any
"But Keil's credibility is severely in question when
you consider he tried to sell his story for what we
believe to be £20,000."
The superintendent said during inquiries into whether
Gallogley could have "confessed" to Keil, prison
officers and other prisoners dismissed any close
friendship between the two.
Superintendent Buchanan said: "I asked Mr Keil why
Gallogley hadn't written the document himself and he
claimed Gallogley was too ill.
"I know for a fact that Gallogley wasn't too ill to
write to his family."
Gallogley "confessed" Fred West had killed a number of
women and children, secreting body parts in jars. The
dossier said West's first wife - bus conductor Rena
Costello, from Coat-bridge - was killed after finding
But West was only 16 years old when Moira disappeared
in 1957 and Gloucestershire Police say there is no
evidence to suggest Fred West was in Coatbridge before
Superintendent Buchanan said: "We know Fred West had
an association with Coatbridge, but not at the time of
"We can find no link between West, Gallogley and
"Nor can we find any link between some of the other
high-profile cases mentioned in this so-called
"The only person who hasn't been named, it seems, is
"My concern is that these sorts of allegations will
cause great distress to the families of the victims
named and described.
"We spoke to Moira's sister at length about this issue
as we were concerned she was being given false hope.
"Clearly, if Moira's disappearance had been an
incident happening today, Gartshore would have been a
prime suspect. But there would also have been other
lines of inquiry."
Keil - who served six years at Peterhead - claims to
be "afraid" for his life because of the high-ranking
judges, Scottish and Crown Office officials,
advocates, police and social workers named in the
He claims others were killed "because of what they
He said: "James Gallogley was the most devious,
cunning person. I had nightmares over what he told me.
"I know he got two letters about the wee girl's death
(Moira Anderson). It haunted him."
Keil claimed Gallogley told him at least three people
were killed because they threatened The Untouchables.
The dossier details Gallogley saying he and Gartshore
adbucted and abused 11-year-old Moira.
Gallogley, jailed for 10 years in 1997 for abusing
five little girls, allegedly said of West: "We became
"Fred was always talking about a group of people who
were into sex and things like making films.
"They called themselves The Untouchables because of
"Fred reassured us these people we had met were from
the Scottish and Crown Offices.
"If anything came up about us, we would be looked
after and would never end up in court, that was a
The credibility is stretched further when Keil claims
to know the identity of serial killer Bible John - who
has never been linked to underage sex.
Last night, Keil insisted he was not involved in a
hoax. He said: "The police would say that - they're
"I spent many days speaking to Gallogley in the
medical centre and that was what he told me. Those
papers were written while I was still in jail."
He also claimed he had been offered £20,000 for the
dossier, not asked for it.
Keil could produce no documents with Gallogley's
handwriting or signature on but said: "I did have
Gallogley's signature. I don't know who has taken it."
But Superintendent Buchanan added: "If the Freedom of
Information Commissioner rules the dossier has to be
made public, it will be a big disappointment to those
pursuing it because there's nothing there and no line
of inquiry that we can pursue.
"If there had been anything at all we could have taken
from this document, we would have acted upon it.
"We would like nothing better than to be able to give
Moira's family answers about what happened to her."
MONSTERS THAT DO DIRTY WORK FOR CORRUPT COURTS 1 October 2006
Citizens Advice aims to restrain bailiff practices
Bailiffs who lie and cheat their way into people's
homes to collect unpaid council tax bills came under
fire today from a new campaign launched by Citizens
The service is fighting against unfair practices used
by bailiffs and aims to highlight the need for a
change to "archaic" laws governing debt collection
Citizens Advice said that bailiffs were frequently
guilty of misrepresenting their powers, abusive and
aggressive behaviour, lying and cheating to gain
access to property, charging fees that hugely increase
the original debt and using threats of violence and
prison to pressurise people into paying lump sums they
are unable to afford.
A citizens advice bureau in West Yorkshire said
bailiffs had demanded a client with a council tax bill
of £389.99 outstanding pay £100 more than the debt
The bailiff threatened to break the door down if he
was refused entry and would not accept the debtor's
offering of a part payment of almost half the debt
Debtors have the right to refuse entry and bailiffs
have no powers to use force to enter a property on a
first visit, although the law does allow them to enter
by an open door or window.
However, once they have entered "peacefully" in their
initial visit, they can use force to get into a
property on subsequent occasions.
The government published a draft tribunals, courts and
enforcement bill in July, which would give bailiffs
the right to apply to courts for permission to use
"reasonable force" to enter premises on the first
visit, which would effectively remove the debtor's
right to refuse entry.
David Harker, chief executive at Citizens Advice,
said: "Reports from clients of intimidations,
unreasonable demands and excessive charges by bailiffs
"This sort of behaviour along with excessive
fee-charging by bailiffs is driving already vulnerable
people deeper into poverty and debt.
"It is essential that the regulation of bailiff
practices is included in the government's new draft
bill to end these unacceptable practices."
Nobody at the Enforcement Services Association, the
trade body for bailiffs, was available for comment.
Judges, police: two of the rule-free classes 1 October 2006
It was the sinister Captain Segura, in Graham Greene’s
Our Man in Havana, who pointed out that citizens
divide into two classes — those you can torture and
those you can’t. In the same way in this country there
are those who have to abide by the rules and those who
There are those who feel that regulations and tax and
laws are for other people — for “the little people” as
the American hotelier Leona Helmsley once notoriously
said. It is irritating for the rest of us, which is
why there was so much glee about the downfall of two
British judges in a blackmail case last week.
This was the most titillating of tales, with plenty of
two-timing rumpy-pumpy and saucy home videos and a
light dusting of cocaine, apparently. Judge J (a
woman) had an affair with Judge I (a man) and shared a
bed and a cleaner (a woman) with him. When Judge J
moved out, the sexy young cleaner moved in, and later
turned to blackmail. Since all this was going on
between adults, it is not strictly any of our
business, hilarious though it may be. (I will never
understand why people who are no longer young or
beautiful persist in filming themselves in flagrante
delicto, as Judge I did more than once. In a judge it
shows an unduly relaxed attitude to evidence.) What
does concern the public, however, is the fact that
these two judges both sit in judgment on immigration.
It is their solemn duty to defend the realm from those
who seek to enter this country illegally and to send
them empty away, yet they both employed just such an
illegal immigrant as their cleaner. It is beyond
Naturally they both testified in court that they did
not know that their blackmailing Brazilian nemesis,
the “chilli-hot” Roselane Driza, was an “overstayer”,
in contemporary cant. But they should have known.
Ignorance, as they both must know, is no defence under
the law, and it is not difficult to check, as one
ought, whether a person is entitled to work here.
Hiring an illegal immigrant is a criminal offence,
which they must also know; less illustrious employers
are regularly prosecuted for it.
Yet both these judges, in senior positions in the
contentious and unhappy mess that is immigration law
today, felt that the usual rules were not for them.
Indeed they would certainly have got away with
breaking the law, in their own chosen legal field, had
not the terrifying Roselane decided to blackmail them
on that very point. Since Roselane was found guilty of
blackmailing the woman, but not the man, Judge J’s
identity has not been revealed, though no doubt
everyone who matters to her knows about it. The
goatish Judge I has been outed as Mohammed Ilyas Khan.
Both now face a disciplinary inquiry.
I suppose one should be grateful that Britain isn’t
remotely Captain Segura’s Havana, and that in this
case at least, judges who imagined they belonged to
the legislation-proof classes have been shown to be
wrong. But one wonders. It seems for instance that the
police sometimes see themselves this way. In an
impressive piece of investigative journalism last
week, Newsnight showed that while most of us suffer
the constant annoyance of speed checks and penalties,
some policemen consider themselves camera-proof.
The reporters found that the police sometimes use
loopholes in the law to avoid being done for speeding.
In what was sometimes a rather comic programme, with
coppers solemnly discussing whether to prosecute
themselves for not admitting which of them was driving
a speeding police van, as caught on camera, the nasty
feeling was reinforced that there is one law for them
and one law for us.
Camera records are sometimes wiped. Prosecutions
aren’t always prosecuted. Whining police cars speed
terrifyingly up and down inner-city streets. And if
some persistent and cynical Newsnight journalists had
not pursued various cases for weeks, undeterred by
complexity, obfuscation, nit-picking, tedium and all
the miseries that investigative journalism is heir to,
we would have been none the wiser. Remember the time
that Jack Straw’s police chauffeur (when home
secretary no less), was somehow excused for speeding?
The rest of us are left feeling confused and
resentful; angry that law-makers and law-enforcers can
get away with breaking the speed laws while we can’t,
and resentful at being tempted, very often, to put the
foot down illegally too. The final irony — the final
supreme annoyance — is that the argument for speed
cameras has suddenly collapsed. Government figures
revealed last week that only 5% of accidents are
caused by speeding; drivers who let their attention
wander cause six times as many accidents.
The rule-proof classes do not have to pay much tax
either. They can hire clever accountants to find ways
of avoiding tax legally and semi-legally, or else they
don’t earn enough to pay tax, or pretend not to. High
and low take a relaxed view of tax; only the wretched
rule-ridden classes, respectable middle Britain, the
petit bourgeois, have to pay their taxes in full. Not
for them the Cayman Islands, or the trust funds or the
life-time gifts; they live under the discipline of
PAYE and Inland Revenue form filling.
While at either end of the social scale the rich and
the improvident are not much affected by death duty,
the respectable classes have to pay inheritance tax
even on their parents’ modest house or flat. When it
comes to pensions, citizens divide into two classes in
the same way. The rule-ridden have to look to a bleak
future on an ever more modest pension; politicians,
having raided our pensions, warn us to tighten our
belts against an impoverished old age. Meanwhile, they
expand their own bellies with ever bigger, ever
better, gold-plated, inflation-proof pensions, and put
up their salaries for good measure.
There are endless examples of this shameless sense of
entitlement among people who denounce it. Tony Blair
chose a backdoor form of selective schooling for his
children at a faith school, while the latest education
bill denies those schools the right to interview.
Restrictions are for others. But the sad truth is that
many citizens would, if they could, join the ranks of
the rule-proof. Nobody can feel quite as pleasantly
indignant about the fate of the judges and their
illegal cleaner as he or she might like.
Bailiffs visit followed by suicide 1 October 2006
THE UK MEDIA AID AND ABET THE BULLYING AND ABUSES OF
CORRUPT AND ILLEGAL COURT AND COUNCIL ACTIONS THIEVING
HOUSES AND POSSESSIONS ON A GRAND SCALE
Bailiffs visit followed by suicide
This site will challenge the behaviour of bailiffs and
the companies they work for. Local Authorities are far
too eager to employ the use of bailiffs. In many many
cases they send bailiffs in, when infact it is the
Local Authority that has made an error in the first
place. Some Local Authorities are really incompetent.
Nottingham City Council is one such authority. In many
cases it is found the debtor did not owe any of the
money to the council, or the amount was wrong !! They
need to think more and check their facts before they
ever even think of the services of bailiffs.
The bailiff industry is booming, huge obscene profits
are made by these firms. They are thriving on the
backs of POOR and VULNERABLE people. There are a huge
amount of cases where VULNERABLE people are living in
extreme poverty. Their financial situation is no
longer in their control, then (caring) Local
Authorities send in the bailiffs who add on obscene
charges and keep on adding to them, sending the
debtors financial situation spiralling out of control.
Many bailiff firms do not even have proper contracts
with Local Authorities. They offer their services FREE
(not out of kindness), the way they make their money
is to keep adding obscene charges, pure GREED. The
bailiff industry are a law unto themselves, with very
little accountability to anyone. They have a
reputation worldwide of being BULLIES, I know about
this only too well, I have had many complaints about
their behaviour. The worst case of this is very close
to me. My daughter lost her son ALFIE WHITE just days
before he was due to be born, after a visit by one of
Rossendales bailiff thugs. I believe Nottingham City
Council and Rossendales bailiffs caused his death.
Some time ago I had an idea that their was need for an
organisation to offer help and advice. An organisation
that would tackle the bad behaviour of thug bailiffs.
Infact the idea was some kind of Bailiff Watch
organisation. As things are starting to progress with
Bailiff Matters, perhaps this will be the organisation
that does just that ! Here were my thoughts at that
Bailiffs need to be more accountable. There should be
an appropriate, independent organisation set up to
deal with complaints about bailiffs. A record of all
complaints should be recorded. A table of complaints
should be recorded against each Bailiff firm. The
organisation should have all the relevant law on
bailiffs and their use. They should be able to supply
the public with any help and advice, a website would
need to be set up to provide this help and advice. It
should be a one stop organisation, where all
information is available. At present it is a nightmare
trying to find the right help you need. It is almost
impossible to get justice the way things are set up at
LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Local authorities should have
better checks on the bailiffs they use and make sure
they are following all guidelines they should be
following. Each Local Authority should make the Law
and rules regarding Bailiffs and their behaviour,
easily available to the general public. Any complaints
about bailiffs should be kept and if complaints start
building up against any firm, they should lose their
contract immediately !! The rules, regulations and
guidelines should be made available on all Local
Authorities websites, and easily accessible.
Local authorities should not involve bailiffs so
lightly as they do at present. They should make better
checks on their records of clients. They can see from
the records if the client comes under the vulnerable
person categories set out in the guidelines. They know
if the client is on benefits, by looking at the
clients file. If the client is on benefits, their case
should never be in the hands of the Bailiffs, as this
is one of the areas of Vulnerability set out in the
National Standards for Enforcement Agents May 2002
which can be found on the Department of Constitutional
Affairs website. Other areas of vulnerability can also
be detected by the council by departments
communicating with each other.
If they were to look at
the clients files they will see if the resident is a
one parent family, which is another area of
vulnerability. They would be able to see if the
resident was Elderly, another area of vulnerability.
If clients are on benefits, the council are able to
make arrangements to have money stopped out of the
clients benefit, at a reasonable set rate. Bailiff
firms Always set a rate the client could not possibly
afford!! These are some of the things I would like to
see in place. Each bailiff firm should be made to pay
a percentage of their obscene profits, to fund a
BAILIFF WATCH organisation. No member of any bailiff
firm should be involved in that organisation.
WELCOME TO BAILIFF MATTERS - HELP AND ADVICE AVAILABLE
- SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCES