The tories were wiped out in Scotland many years ago and more recently in Wales but it has taken a lot longer for England to finally realise the Eton tory scum and filth are murdering their fellow countrymen in hate and smear campaigns directed against those least able to defend themselves.

The reality now waking up the English is that they themselves may find a sudden change of circumstances will led to the same homelessness and penniless, and in many cases suicide, for those already facing the draconian cuts and psychological persecution campaigns being used to push the seriously ill and mentally disabled over the edge. Never have a British political party acted so ruthlessly while their press barons pals hold them up as hero's.

But they did a similar thing with the BBC's predatory paedo Jimmy Savile who was being hailed as a hero and legend despite the fact he was a child molesting monster. So the same media having been trying to dress Cameron and his vile henchmen up as some sort of HERO's despite clear evidence of their murderous campaigns and only to concerned about pushing wealth in the direction of their ultra rich backers(some who provide their media propaganda) and their own off shore tax avoiding bank accounts while ruthlessly murdering with impunity anyone who becomes a target for their vile agenda .

How long before the rest of England realise what Scotland and Wales have known all along that the Tories bring never ending misery everytime the South of England back their election campaigns. Though at the last election they narrowly got through and had to use a coalition with the Lib Dems to have any hope of running the country into the ground, and they have a long history of destroying the UK's infrastructure during their reigns of terror. The south of England need to waken up before even more of their fellow countrymen die under the harsh regime that the tories seem to wallow in and wouldn't look out of place at a Gestapo meeting.

  • Conservatives in crisis as UKIP push Tories into THIRD place as Lib Dems hold onto must-win seat with dramatic by-election victory (and this from their tory loving press baron Harsmworth's Daily Rag)
    Information and Evidence Unit
    Office of the Prosecutor
    Post Office Box 19519
    2500 CM The Hague
    The Netherlands


    A/O Deputy prosecutor Mrs Fatou Bensouda – prosecutor Luis Ocampo

    Dear Sir/Madam

    I have written to you previously in regard to the many continual crimes the ever rising many including myself are facing in the UK. Another person by the name of David Law also forwarded evidence to you of the same/similar UK crimes. You replied to me on the 23 April 07 giving the reference number OTP –CR –00121/07 from Head of information and evidence unit – office of the prosecutor. Stating as soon as a decision is reached you would write as well as giving reasons for the decision. To date I have received no reply.

    However issues of unlawful unnecessary oppression, hardship and much more have increased ten fold from a non-caring corrupt UK Prime Minister (PM) D Cameron M P. Where I would again like to place the issue with full documented evidence before the ICC court for a lawful hearing. These too be shown documented crimes towards UK society will lawfully speak for themselves in disclosure to the court in the following lawful way. In writing to the committee on standards in public life, who advise our political elite and raising the unlawful issues I enclose to you. The committee informed me that the issues I raised are the responsibility of the current Prime Minister and his current ruling political party.

    It will be shown to the court in evidence over many years Prime Minister D Cameron has been sent many letters of lawful complaint from myself. Not only of my own injustice but also that of an ever rising many to show they are not isolated incidents. For each of these letters contained enclosed irrefutable documented evidence to show lawful cause of all that was mentioned in the letters. This included filmed and photographic evidence as well as others witness testimony to show lawful cause to my statements of facts that I now enclose to you in brief.

    The UK law system – Which is supposed to be the basis of UK society

    1 - Solicitors taking pecuniary advantage of the taxpayer funded legal aid service to unlawfully procure taxpayer’s money as well as much other unlawful misuse.

    1a - Solicitors not acting in they’re client’s best interest as well as often unlawfully perverting the course of justice preventing a fair hearing.

    1b -Deliberately intensifying people’s issues to take advantage in cost and of the above mentioned legal aid service

    2 - Not fit for lawful purpose UK courts presided by corrupt judges who do not uphold the acts of UK law, or the UK court rules. Who will unlawfully maliciously persecute rather than be honest and just according to the law and any evidence presented. Where a lawful right to a fair hearing should be a human right it will be shown in ever-rising instances there is none? The secret family courts in the UK will again be shown unlawfully unjust of the same in ever-rising issues.

    3 - The police not honouring there stated public duty to uphold the acts of UK law by ever-rising complainants. Where more often than not the complainant instead of receiving any lawful public duty will receive unlawful malicious vindictive persecution. Where unlawful sectioning, unlawful fit ups for crimes never committed as well as many, many other forms of this unlawful persecution are unlawfully used. Such as with any long term complainants being unlawfully deemed vexatious as well as maliciously degradingly persecuted. This unlawful treatment continually runs rife in the UK police and is unlawfully aided and abetted by others. Where there is also the criminal activity of what is being deemed as white-collar fraud that costs the taxpayer millions if not billions. Because many government, their local solicitors, and councillors are involved the police will again unlawfully not uphold the law

    4 - Government complaints departments run on taxpayers money in ever-rising issues not acting honestly within there stated legislation or the law on behalf of UK society. Where in ever rising issues they by their lack of public duty causes further unlawful degrading harmful treatment to UK society.

    5 - An unlawful wilful blindness from those in government supposedly supposed to be working for the People under P M D Cameron’s MP directions. Where again the avoidance of any honouring of any public duty to uphold the law was shown by all contacted (over 100 lords and 100 MP’s). Where rather than lawfully/legislatively act for the good of society P M D Cameron MP again did nothing.

    6 - It will be further shown in evidence of the many MPs in government unlawfully abused their positions in what is a continual ongoing taxpayer paid expense scandal. Where not only did PM D Cameron MP in instances aid and abet this scandal he also introduced a new lesser law for anybody political criminally caught. Where there now runs rife a no lawful or otherwise accountability for the many in UK government.
    6a – It will also be shown in evidence how other given legislation of PM D Cameron has caused needless hardship to life in majority/ other minorities of UK society including myself.
    6b – It will be further shown in irrefutable evidence of how P M D Cameron in the recession used the phrase “We are all in this together” Much, much documented evidence will show this to be completely untrue in ever-rising evidence.

    7 - In regard to a recession, which is currently in the UK shown to be unlawfully caused by the Bankers with many, many others involved. Prime Minister D Cameron will be shown in evidence to have financially and otherwise rewarded the many involved in this deliberately instigated unlawful recession. Where he unlawfully procured taxpayer’s money to further finance this deliberate shown in many instances deception and fraud. While much further oppressing denying and causing degrading harm to the UK society and individual taxpayer.

    8 - It shall be shown in evidence to the court how we were deceptively taken into an agreement known as the European Union (EU). Where in view of knowing the UK peoples wishes for a referendum in regard to the joining of the EU. P M D Cameron MP again acted deceptively in promising a referendum if he was voted in his current status as UK Prime Minister. He has since promised again of the same referendum and unlawfully degradingly denied democracy twice to UK society Where he wishes us to stay in the EU despite there being issues of fraud and deception that runs into some £89 billion pounds. Where for its eighteenth year the EU accountants would again not pass its financial books. From 1973 to present day the UK has paid some £97 billion into the EU fund and conditions for UK society have only got far and degradingly worse. Yet PM D Cameron still wishes to continue this pursuit while denying UK society its democratic referendum. Where the many of UK society still ponder at any fairness of any referendum due to past evidence of corruption within our democratic system.

    Which has not been helped by much of the ever rising continually seen of all that is unlawfully ongoing within and by our political elite. Where as stated previously P M D Cameron has been made much aware and continually unlawfully fails to lawfully/legislatively address. Those issues that should be his public duty, as well as ensuring democracy defined to the UK people.

    8a – It shall also be lawfully asked of the court by a vast volume of evidence including showing the same difficulties in accounting as the EU. Which shall include as evidence accountants opinion & advice, asking the following question “If the UK government was an ordinary business instead of being run on taxpayers money, would it be lawfully viable?

    9 – The unlawful suppression of truth in UK government enquires Currently in the UK is an ongoing uptake of an issue concerning paedophilia which former Prime Minister T Blair placed a D notice to conceal the truth. Because it involved certain members of the UK government, who could still be involved from this now new uptake. P M D Cameron has said he wants an honest investigation not a witch-hunt. Where how can there be any honest investigation when P M D Cameron continually unlawfully suppresses this closed to the public evidence. This involves the all round safety of the UK’s children why is PM D Cameron MP unlawfully suppressing all the previous facts? Especially when they are lawfully said to be pertinent to the current paedophilia issue under investigation. Coupled with the now just released fact of there being over sixty thousand sex offenders in the UK

    9a - It must also be stated to the court of how documented evidence was sent to the many in UK government including P M D Cameron of how and why there will again be no honest investigation into this issue. Which is due to the much included all round failings of what he has been notified of many, many times. He has again done nothing lawful or legislative to ensure of any honesty in this investigation or his governments continual unlawful actions.

    9b – Much other documented evidence will be disclosed in lawfully showing these are not isolated issues.

    10 – There will be many questions lawfully raised of the inadequate often-unlawful actions within our NHS system. This will also include in how PM D Cameron MP has allowed a form of what can be lawfully deemed as genocide into this service of the UK people. These are but a few of the unlawful everyday issues facing UK society where when one asks for any honouring of any stated public duty. Or for any acts of UK law to be upheld, where no matter what documented evidence is enclosed all you find is an unlawful wilful blindness.

    Where an ever-rising many such as myself cannot find any lawful redress from anyone or any other source in the UK then one can only turn to the ICC in regard to these continual criminal degrading acts of P M D Cameron MP. Where in asking for my issue to be heard I would also please request of the court they would also take the following lawfully into account prior their decision. Philosophical law – Upon which is said everything is based, states (circa) To form the basis of any society and for that society to exist, it has to have a working government. In order for that government to work on behalf of society and continue its existence it has to have laws.

    So when it may be lawfully shown those laws in ever-rising instances and the same of legislation derived from those laws is not being upheld by its current Prime Minister D Cameron Member Parliament. With the further given documented facts, of unnecessary unlawful continual oppression in many, many other ways too UK society. Coupled with his many other shown documented unlawful unnecessary failures to UK society. Which again have caused much unnecessary, harm, oppression and suffering to the majority of UK society. Then what else beside Crimes against humanity of this UK society can they be lawfully deemed?

    Democracy – As defined by Webster’s concise edition of the English dictionary ISBN 1 85534 961 2 – A form of government by the people through elected representatives; a country governed by its people, political, social legal equality. – In which the UK is stated to reside.

    When it may be shown to the court in much and many varieties of documented evidence this not to be the lawful legislative case from the current PM D Cameron MP. When it also may be further shown this lack of honouring of public duty by P M D Cameron MP towards UK society is causing much unnecessary as well as unlawful. Such as in the supplied list, then it must be asked where from P M D Cameron MP is any political social and legal equality to society? Yet here is a man who will be shown in documented evidence not only to be responsible for my own injustice, but also supposed to be working on societies behalf. Yet in most if not all disclosed is not only many instances of unlawful violations of our laws, but also to that in which P M D Cameron MP is said to govern by. Which as will be shown in any future evidence are the stated seven principles of public life,

    Further evidence will also disclose how the UK government (which PM D Cameron MP continues) has used (unlawful) legislation to further distance themselves from society, rather than work on its personal behalf. It will also be shown in further irrefutable documented evidence the UK democracy is being further unlawfully maliciously degradingly abused by P M D Cameron MP. In this affecting the majority for the worse in many varieties of other unlawful oppressive harmful ways, coupled with the above and listed facts. So when one has nowhere else for any lawful redress except the ICC for these continual crimes against UK humanity that are affecting not only myself but also the whole of UK society. I would please request of the prosecutors office this issue be taken for a hearing. Where may I please also request of the court/prosecutors office if a favourable decision for hearing, any advice notes which may help me in setting out the issue in correct court order file

    I await your earliest reply Yours faithfully

    Paul Ronald


  • Request to MP for public enquiry into PM Cameron - Letter to PM Cameron MP
    workfare scheme illegal and unlawful

    iain duncan smith

    Cameron's murdering tory thug and henchman Iain Duncan Smith CAUGHT abusing the powers of office like a Gestapo stormtrooper and who has been putting millions of vulnerable victims at risk
    atos blood Canadian Citizen Writes To The Hague Over UK Government Treatment Of Disabled Persons

    To: Mrs. Fatou Bensouda, ICC Prosecutor
    Information and Evidence Unit
    Office of the Prosecutor
    International Criminal Court
    Post Office Box 19519
    2500 CM The Hague
    The Netherlands

    E-Mail: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int

    Subject: Austerity deaths of sick and disabled people in the U.K.

    Dear Mrs. Bensouda,

    I am a 56-year-old Disability Studies specialist from Montreal, Canada who has been reporting frequently for the past year to the United Nations on the crisis for the United Kingdom’s sick and disabled. Austerity measures, consisting of draconian welfare reforms and “sham” means-testing (Atos Healthcare U.K. and the Department for Work and Pensions) are ostensibly to blame for their plight—with disability hate crime and inflammatory media attacks factored into this mix. I have a plethora of evidence but for the purpose of brevity, see:

    1) Early day motion 295 http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2012-13/295

    2) The attached British Medical Journal Article by Dr. Margaret McCartney [as part of original communication].

    3) http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2012/04/32-die-a-week-after-failing-in.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    4) http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/22/epileptic-colin-traynor-29-had-massive-seizure-and-died-3-months-after-dwpatos-fit-for-work-ruling-michael-meacher-mp/

    5) http://www.twitlonger.com/show/jcsufp

    6) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/15/austerity-measures-uk-a-thousand-cuts_n_1670711.html

    7) https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4DDIATl4FpJS1dNWEVHTkUzWXc

    8) https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4DDIATl4FpJdktNYi1HOTM5S3M

    9) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/08/leveson-willful-blindness-disabled-people

    10) http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/aug/14/disability-hate-crime-increase-reported-incidents-data

    11) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/aug/14/disability-hate-crime-benefit-scrounger-abuse?intcmp=239

    12) http://www.scope.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdfs/Campaigns_policy/Scope_Hate_Crime_Report.pdf

    13) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yRaBth9w6Q

    14) http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/22/paralysed-teenager-on-life-support-since-birth-told-to-attend-dwpatos-work-capability-assessment-or-lose-his-benefits/

    15) http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/22/disabled-people-collateral-damage-in-the-governments-austerity-war/

    16) http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/22/atos-scandal-victims-speak-to-the-scottish-daily-record/

    17) http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/22/disabled-people-are-being-unfairly-targeted-in-what-amounts-to-collective-punishment-prohibited-under-1949-geneva-conventions/

    18) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm120904/halltext/120904h0001.htm#12090423000002

    19) Please note the comments of MP Dame Anne Begg in item #18.

    I am interested in filing an ICC complaint against several British Ministers—namely, Iain Duncan Smith, Chris Grayling, and Maria Miller for their role in the draconian welfare reforms and the resultant deaths of their society’s most vulnerable. My questions are as follows: Are austerity deaths of the sick and disabled in the U.K. considered a crime against humanity by the ICC? Would the UNCRPD be taken into consideration by the court?

    I am aware of a submission to the ICC by psychologists Olga and Tanya Yeritsidou regarding a request for a Greek austerity trial at the Hague—so there appears to be precedent in this matter. Based on the preliminary evidence that I have submitted with this letter, do you believe that the sick and disabled of Britain have a justiciable ICC case? I look forward to hearing from you at the earliest possible convenience. My personal information is on file with the UN CRPD Secretary, Jorge Araya. My street address follows below.

    Best wishes.

    Samuel Miller.

  • British people are committing suicide to escape poverty. Is this what the State wants?
  • Just when you thought the DWP/Atos death trail couldn’t get worse…

    A university graduate has today won her Court of Appeal claim that requiring her to work for free at a Poundland discount store was unlawful.

    Cait Reilly was backed by three judges in London who ruled that the regulations under which most of the Government’s back-to-work schemes were created are unlawful and quashed them. But they disagreed with a comparison to the programmes as 'slave labour', and found that participation in the schemes does not breach human rights, in the legal aid funded case. However, lawyers say today's ruling could mean thousands who had their benefits stripped for refusing to take part in the programme - designed to help the unemployed gain skills through training and unpaid work - could now reclaim them at a multi-million pound cost to the taxpayer.

    Today Miss Reilly, 24, from Birmingham, and 40-year-old unemployed HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, from Nottingham, both succeeded in their claims that the unpaid schemes were legally flawed. Their solicitors said later the ruling means 'all those people who have been sanctioned by having their jobseekers’ allowance withdrawn for non-compliance with the back-to-work schemes affected will be entitled to reclaim their benefits.'

    But a DWP spokesperson said it was adamant that there would not be any repayment and was seeking permission to appeal to the High Court. She added: 'We have no intention of giving back money to anyone who has had their benefits removed because they refused to take getting into work seriously. We are currently considering a range of options to ensure this does not happen.'


    Work experience scheme - For 16 to 24-year-olds. Scheme offers a work experience placement with a business for two to eight weeks. Job seekers volunteer for the course but they must continue to look for permanent jobs. These placements can become apprenticeships and lead to potential employment later.

    Sector based work academy places - Open to people of all ages. They are voluntary to join and can last for six weeks, including training and then four weeks' work experience, tailored to local job vacancies. They end in a guaranteed job interview. Jobseekers can still claim benefits but once they get a place attendance becomes mandatory and face losing benefits if they don't attend. Mandatory work activity - Placements are usually for people who have been unemployed for more than 13 weeks. Each placement can last up to four weeks. People can still receive benefits but can face losing them for 13 weeks if they fail to attend.

    Work programme - is open to anyone and is the backbone of the government's back-to-work policy. If you are 18-24, nine months after you start to claim jobless benefits you are required to attend the Work Programme. If you are above 25 years old, 12 months after you start to claim jobseekers' allowance you are required to attend. It is delivered by companies and charities appointed as service providers by the DWP. Post work programme - expected to start this year, it will be for those who have been through the Work Programme and have still not found a job. Participants will be expected to accept ongoing case management or a community action placement - a mandatory six-month work experience placement tailored to your local communities needs. Anyone who fails to attend without a good reason faces losing their benefits. Today’s ruling was made by Lord Justice Pill, Lady Justice Black and Sir Stanley Burnton.

    In November 2011, Miss Reilly had to leave her voluntary work at a local museum and work unpaid at the Poundland store in Kings Heath, Birmingham, under a scheme known as the 'sector-based work academy.' She was told that if she did not carry out the work placement she would lose her jobseeker’s allowance. For two weeks she stacked shelves and cleaned floors.

    Mr Wilson, a qualified mechanic, was told that he had to work unpaid, cleaning furniture for 30 hours a week for six months, under a scheme known as the Community Action Programme. He objected to doing unpaid work that was unrelated to his qualifications and would not help him re-enter the jobs market. He refused to participate and as a result was stripped of his jobseeker’s allowance for six months.

    After the ruling Public Interest Lawyers, who represent Ms Reilly and Mr Wilson, said the Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision was a 'huge setback for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), whose flagship reforms have been beset with problems since their inception'. They said that 'until new regulations are enacted with proper parliamentary approval, nobody can be compelled to participate on the schemes.' Solicitor Tessa Gregory, said: 'Today’s judgment sends Iain Duncan Smith back to the drawing board to make fresh regulations which are fair and comply with the court’s ruling.

    'Until that time nobody can be lawfully forced to participate in schemes affected such as the Work Programme and the Community Action Programme. 'All of those who have been stripped of their benefits have a right to claim the money back that has been unlawfully taken away from them.' Ms Gregory said: 'The case has revealed that the Department for Work and Pensions was going behind Parliament's back and failing to obtain Parliamentary approval for the various mandatory work schemes that it was introducing.

    'It also reveals a lack of transparency and fairness in the implementation of these schemes. 'The claimants had no information about what could be required of them under the back-to-work schemes. 'The Court of Appeal has affirmed the basic constitutional principle that everyone has a right to know and understand why sanctions are being threatened and imposed against them.' Ms Reilly said she was delighted with today's judgment.

    'I brought this case because I knew it was wrong when I was prevented from doing my voluntary work in a museum and forced to work in Poundland for free for two weeks as part of a scheme known as the sector based work academy, ' she said. 'Those two weeks were a complete waste of my time as the experience did not help me get a job. 'I wasn't given any training and I was left with no time to do my voluntary work or search for other jobs.

    'The only beneficiary was Poundland, a multimillion-pound company. Later I found out that I should never have been told the placement was compulsory. 'I don't think I am above working in shops like Poundland. I now work part time in a supermarket. It is just that I expect to get paid for working.

    'Those two weeks were a complete waste of my time as the experience did not help me get a job'
    Cait Reilly

    'I hope the Government will now take this opportunity to rethink its strategy and do something which actually builds on young unemployed people's skills and tackles the causes of long-term unemployment. 'I agree we need to get people back to work but the best way of doing that is by helping them, not punishing them.

    'The Government ought to understand that if they created schemes which actually helped people get back into work then they wouldn't need to force people to attend.' Mr Wilson said in a statement after the ruling: 'I refused to participate in the Community Action Programme (CAP) because I objected to being made to clean furniture for 30 hours a week for six months when I knew it wouldn't help me find employment.


    In his ruling, Lord Justice Pill said he agreed there was an 'important public interest in getting people back to work' as well as a 'major saving in not having to pay Jobseeker’s Allowance, and possibly other benefits.' The judge also said he appreciated there could be a substantial saving of public money if effective sanctions are available when jobseekers are not cooperating with proposals.

    He added: 'The Secretary of State’s object in these proceedings is not to end jobseeker’s allowance but to ensure that it is only paid to those actively seeking employment and prepared to cooperate with attempts made by the state to achieve that end. The entitlement to receive the weekly sum should depend on such cooperation.' But the judge said it was a matter of 'statutory construction'.

    Declaring the regulations unlawful, he said they must be quashed since their central purpose was to impose 'requirements' on claimants of jobseeker allowance and impose sanctions for failing to comply. He said: 'Claimants must be made aware of their obligations and of the circumstances in which, and the manner in which, sanctions will be applied.' 'I was given next to no information about the programme. I was told simply that I had to do whatever the DWP's private contractor instructed me to do and that if I didn't I may lose my benefits. 'Being without jobseeker's allowance was very difficult for me but I don't regret taking a stand as the CAP is a poorly thought-out and poorly implemented scheme which even according to the DWP's own statistics is not helping anyone get people back to work. 'I am now participating in the Work Programme but it doesn't involve me working for free.'

    The Government expressed 'disappointment and surprised at the court's decision on the regulations. But employment minister Mark Hoban said the the judges' ruling upheld the Government's right to run back-to-work schemes. Mr Hoban said: 'The court has backed our right to require people to take part in programmes which will help get them into work. 'It's ridiculous to say this is forced labour. This ruling ensures we can continue with these important schemes. 'We are however disappointed and surprised at the court's decision on our regulations.

    'There needed to be flexibility so we could give people the right support to meet their needs and get them into a job. 'We do not agree with the court's judgment and are seeking permission to appeal, but new regulations will be tabled to avoid any uncertainty. 'Ultimately the judgment confirms that it is right that we expect people to take getting into work seriously if they want to claim benefits.'

    The feckless parasites in the House of Lords (the Queens masonic lackeys in Westminster) live a life of opulence on the back of the long suffering British public while passing legislation that starves the peasants

    HARD-PRESSED taxpayers are being stung for more than £2.3million a year to subsidise restaurants, bars and cafes for members of the House of Lords.

    The subsidy works out at £83.90 per week for each of the 760 peers, many of whom are millionaires. An unemployed person on JobSeeker’s Allowance is expected to live on £71 a week.

    The peers’ fine dining discount comes on top of the £300 per day they get for attending the Lords, which is supposed to cover their food as well as accommodation. We paid £757,696 in 2011-12 to subsidise Westminster’s Peers’ Dining Room, where lords, bishops and baronesses can enjoy a starter of marinated king scallops with baby fennel, blood orange, puffed pork rind and crisp shallots for just £7. The self-service River Restaurant offers more everyday dishes at bargain prices – thanks to a handout of £501,646 from the taxpayer. Another £246,307 of our money went to the plush Barry Room restaurant, where only £6 will buy a hungry peer a starter of quail with pancetta popcorn, sweetcorn and red onions. And the more humble Home Room, where lords and ladies tired of fine dining can tuck into canteen food such as sausage and mash, was subsidised to the tune of £185,694. Voters struggling to make ends meet in the economic downturn also subsidised the peers’ Bishops’ Bar (£43,971), the Millbank House Cafe (£73,857), the peers’ guest room (£2843) and the Lords Bar (£326).

    That made a total of £1,812,258. But when general “central costs” of £549,179 were added, the overall subsidy rose to £2,361,437 – £63,822.62 for each of the 37 weeks the Lords was in session. Parliamentary officials insisted the 2011-12 subsidy was only £1.33million.

    But they got that figure by subtracting profits from private events and even gift shop sales – a practice branded “creative accounting” by critics. The shocking scale of the Lords catering subsidy was revealed after a question from Labour peer Lord Campbell-Savours. The figures were published in Hansard, the official record of Parliament. Peers could easily pay for their dinners without discounts. The former Tory leader of the Lords, Lord Strathclyde, is worth an estimated £10million, and former deputy prime minister Lord Heseltine has an estimated fortune of £200million.

    Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “Creative accounting won’t change the fact that taxpayers are subsiding food and drink for MPs and lords when many families are struggling to put food on the table. “Politicians promised to end this scandalous subsidy. It’s time they stuck to their words.”

    A Lords spokesman said the restaurants were bound to make a loss because of the “unique nature and practices” of the House. He said the catering and retail subsidy had been cut by 22 per cent since 2007 and would be 43 per cent down by the end of 2012-13. And he added: “The House of Lords is working to increase efficiencies and raise prices where appropriate in order to reduce the refreshment department subsidy on a year-by-year basis.”

    austerity death card If there is any more evidence required to prove the UK have the most evil government ever is by examining the statistics that show the sick and disabled are dropping like flies thanks to the vile regime that now haunts the corridors of 10 Downing Street. While the gestapo used gas ovens to murder the crippled and mentally frail, the tory scum use the DWP and ATOS and their partners in crime the Lib-dems.

    With their tory press pals like Harmsworth(Daily Mail), Murdoch (Sun and Times), Barclay Brothers(Telegraph) and Desmond(Daily Express) plying the unsuspecting public with the demonization of the disabled, the tory gangsters are plying their financial backers and pals running private companies like Triage with HUGE government grants to treat the mentally ill as LTB's lying thieving bastards.These are the vile scum and filthy sprogs of rich tory toffs whose forefathers have a long history of sucking up to the royal mafia, removed from all emotion and feeling by the grooming imposed at the Nazi Royals (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) brainwashing centre at Eton .

    When are the sheeple going to show any sign of a conscience when their fellow citizens are dying from sinister psychological torture that the Royal mafia's masonic henchmen have been expert at sharpening over centuries and behind the British Empires rape and pillage of the world? The same mindset persists and ingrained in the Eton groomed Bullingdon scum who show all the psychopathic traits the Royals have sought out and used throughout their vile empire building with a 'licence to kill' any victims groups that become their latest target.

    Her loyal lieutenant the creepy Duke of Kent sets in motion the masonic henchmen from the United Grand Lodge of England along with his 33 degree masonic henchmen out of the rear of Chatham House at 10 Duke Street St. James to provide the layers of extreme pressure to the system aiding and abetting the tories murderous agenda.

  • When the rich are born to rule, the results can be fatal
  • Revenge of the Benefit Scroungers, Fighting back on behalf of demonised welfare claimants
  • Austerity — the Biggest Con Ever
  • A fair society? How the cuts target disabled people
  • Hundreds of Scots DEAD as FOI reveals thousands die in UK as a result of Con-Dem benefits ‘tests’ by ATOS
  • 32 die a week after failing test for new incapacity benefit
  • Former soldier spends two years 'fighting' the DWP to keep £70-a-month carers' allowance
  • LTB New DWP Acronym for Disabled